Search (174 results, page 2 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Ostendorp, C.; Trinks-Schulz, H.: Integriertes Bibliothekssystem BABSY/i3v an der Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Gelsenkirchen (1999) 0.02
    0.024705233 = product of:
      0.049410466 = sum of:
        0.049410466 = product of:
          0.09882093 = sum of:
            0.09882093 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09882093 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2000 15:22:58
  2. Harmsen, B.: Adding value to Web-OPACs (2000) 0.02
    0.024522282 = product of:
      0.049044564 = sum of:
        0.049044564 = product of:
          0.09808913 = sum of:
            0.09808913 = weight(_text_:web in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808913 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Breeding, M.: Thinking about your next OPAC (2007) 0.02
    0.024522282 = product of:
      0.049044564 = sum of:
        0.049044564 = product of:
          0.09808913 = sum of:
            0.09808913 = weight(_text_:web in 6745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808913 = score(doc=6745,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 6745, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It's clear that today's typical library users are Web-sawy and have very high expectations. Librarians need to offer interfaces on Web sites that match or exceed those found on the commercial Web. Paired with high-quality content that's selected and created by librarians, a state-of-the-art Web interface is a compelling destination for users.
  4. Steiner, E.S.: OPAC 2.0 : Mit Web 2.0-Technologie zum Bibliothekskatalog der Zukunft? (2007) 0.02
    0.024522282 = product of:
      0.049044564 = sum of:
        0.049044564 = product of:
          0.09808913 = sum of:
            0.09808913 = weight(_text_:web in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808913 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Teilen: Der erste Teil beinhaltet eine Einführung in den Begriff Web 2.0 und in die allgemeinen Rahmenbedingungen der zugehörigen technischen Entwicklungen. Des Weiteren werden exemplarische Techniken vorgestellt, die Web 2.0 zugeschrieben werden können sowie einige beispielhafte Anwendungen. Im zweiten Teil wird die Diskussion um Bibliothek 2.0 aufgegriffen, um anschließend näher auf Web 2.0 Techniken in Bibliothekskatalogen bzw. den OPAC 2.0 einzugehen. Verschiedene Techniken, die im OPAC 2.0 Anwendung finden können, werden diskutiert und zuletzt werden einige beispielhafte OPACs vorgestellt.
  5. Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000) 0.02
    0.023081116 = product of:
      0.046162233 = sum of:
        0.046162233 = sum of:
          0.021456998 = weight(_text_:web in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021456998 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.024705233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024705233 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  6. Slone, D.J.: ¬A bird's eye view of cross-platform web interaction (2005) 0.02
    0.022989638 = product of:
      0.045979276 = sum of:
        0.045979276 = product of:
          0.09195855 = sum of:
            0.09195855 = weight(_text_:web in 4535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09195855 = score(doc=4535,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 4535, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This exploratory study sets out to describe the ways in which end-users exchanged information between the web and a web online catalog, how they searched one device based on what they knew about the other, and their experiences in navigating between the two devices. Design/methodology/approach - Thirty-one participants were observed searching the web or a web online catalog. After the observations, an interview guide was used to ask targeted questions. Findings - The findings suggest that people familiar with the use of traditional online catalogs were more comfortable using web tools than those who lacked online catalog experience. People who had recent web experience expected online catalog searching to be similar to web searching. However, drawing too close an association between the two systems sometimes caused difficulties when the searching protocols varied, like keyword searching versus selecting an index. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations of the study include a small sampling size, varied responses to interview questions, obtrusive procedures, and lack of generalizability to groups or settings dissimilar from the one in this study. Originality/value - This study provides a rare look into the challenges faced by a diverse group of public library users on the web. It is instructive for practicing librarians and researchers.
  7. WLN announces World Wide Web access (1998) 0.02
    0.02167484 = product of:
      0.04334968 = sum of:
        0.04334968 = product of:
          0.08669936 = sum of:
            0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669936 = score(doc=1769,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    WLN has announced that it will offer WebLN, a WWW interface to the WLN databases and WebLN PAC, which will provide customized Web OPACs for individual libraries and library consortia bibliographic databases. It will also offer Blackwell's Table of Contents records through its MARC Records Service
  8. Hildreth, C.R.: Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors? : an experimental study (2000) 0.02
    0.02167484 = product of:
      0.04334968 = sum of:
        0.04334968 = product of:
          0.08669936 = sum of:
            0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669936 = score(doc=113,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web (simplified here to "Web") is well-known for its "point and click" graphical user interface (GUI) and hyperlink search and navigate capabilities. When OPACs are placed in this operational context, users can easily hyperlink from a bibliographic display to related search terms, class marks, or bibliographic records. This hyperlinking capability is not available in most conventional text-based OPACs. As more and more users undertake their searches on Web-based information retrieval systems such as OPACs, it is natural to ask, "Are Web-based OPACs more effective retrieval systems than their conventional predecessors?" This paper presents the findings of an experimental study which compared users' search performance, assessments of ease of use, and satisfaction with search results after use of a Web OPAC or its conventional counterpart. The primary questions addressed by this research center on the influence of two experimental factors, OPAC search interface style and search task level of difficulty, on the dependent variables: actual search performance, perceptions of ease of use, and user assessments of satisfaction with search results. It was hypothesized that Web OPACs would be assessed as easier to use and that they would outperform conventional OPACs when measured by actual search results and users' levels of satisfaction with search results. Web OPAC searchers outperformed Text OPAC searchers, but search task level of difficulty is a major determinant of search success. The study also found little association between searchers' level of satisfaction with results and actual search performance
  9. BOND: Web-Opac Premium (2004) 0.02
    0.02167484 = product of:
      0.04334968 = sum of:
        0.04334968 = product of:
          0.08669936 = sum of:
            0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669936 = score(doc=2251,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Orientiert an den Anforderungen der Bibliotheksbenutzer, hat BOND nun eine PremiumVersion des Web-Opacs entwickelt. Ziel dabei war es, das Angebot der Bibliothek für ihre LeserInnen noch attraktiver zu gestalten. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei das tatsächliche Informationsverhalten der Bibliotheksbenutzer. Mit dem neuen Web-Opac Premium werden Informationen kanalisiert und so aufbereitet, dass die LeserInnen sie noch schneller und bequemer im Zugriffhaben. Neben den Standard WebOpac-Funktionen (recherchieren, verlängern, vorbestellen, etc.) ist der neue Web-Opac Premium daher zusätzlich mit zahlreichen nützlichen Web-Portalfunktionen gespickt. Diese ermöglichen der Bibliothek, ihren LeserInnen ganz individuell gewünschte Informationen und eine Vielzahl attraktiver Services anzubieten. Beispiele für die Portalfunktionen: Mit dem Web-Opac Premium können die Leser einfach und übersichtlich in hochwertigen Allgemein- und Fach-Lexika suchen. Jeder Benutzer kann sich ein persönliches Interessen-Profil selbst erstellen. So wird er gesondert auf die für ihn interessanten Medien und Informationen hingewiesen. Das persönliche Profil zeigt unter anderem auch entliehene Medien, Fristen und Gebühren. Als weiteren Service kann die Bibliothek automatisch Medien-Listen mit personalisierten Empfehlungen für ihre Benutzer (je nach Interessen-Profil) erstellen. Über eine Verwaltungsoberfläche kann die Bibliothek zudem globale Profile festlegen, mit denen zum Beispiel Erwachsene andere Informationen im Zugriff haben als Kinder oder wiederum andere als Mitarbeiter. Über diese Verwaltungsoberfläche können auch kinderleicht attraktive Informationsquellen (kommentierte Linklisten, gestaltete Informationsseiten [HTML], Veranstaltungskalender, Neuigkeiten, Diskussionsforen etc.) eingebunden und aktualisiert werden. Der Web-Opac Premium lässt sich durch zusätzliche Web-Module erweitern. So zum Beispiel durch WebGate, den Zugang zur DigiBib (Digitale Bibliothek des HBZ), und durch SpiderSearch, den grafischen Assoziativ-Opac. So kann sich jede Bibliothek ihr individuelles »Informationszentrum Bibliothek« bauen. - Weitere Informationen bei BOND, Telefon 0 63 24/9612311, oder E-Mail <vertrieb@ bond-online.de>."
  10. Kneifel, F.: Mit Web 2.0 zum Online-Katalog der nächsten Generation (2009) 0.02
    0.02167484 = product of:
      0.04334968 = sum of:
        0.04334968 = product of:
          0.08669936 = sum of:
            0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669936 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Web 2.0 hat auch bei Bibliotheksnutzern zu veränderten Erwartungshaltungen an bibliothekarische Online-Angebote wie die Kataloge geführt. Diese waren lange Zeit statische Nachweisinstrumente, die heutzutage über das Angebot reiner Bestandsverzeichnisse hinausgehend verschiedene Web 2.0-Funktionalitäten sowie Zusatzinformationen mittels Kataloganreicherung integrierten sollten, um den Erwartungen der Nutzer zu genügen. Die Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage unter Nutzern einer Großstadtbibliothek unterstreichen dies: die Nutzer wünschen sich vielfältige Browsingmöglichkeiten, Google-ähnliche Suchmöglichkeiten, zusätzliche Inhalte und ein personalisier-bares Angebot. Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten? Am Beispiel der Stadtbücherei Frankfurt wird dargestellt wie Prinzipien des Web 2.0 - u.a. Nutzerfreundlichkeit und Kollaboration - auf das Online-Angebot übertragbar sind, ohne dabei den Personalaufwand, die rechtliche Absicherung der Bibliothek und Fragen der technischen Implementierung zu vergessen.
    Content
    Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Masterarbeit, 2008 u.d.T.: Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten?
    RSWK
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
    Subject
    Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
  11. Ramesh Babu, B.; O'Brien, A.: Web OPAC interfaces : an overview (2000) 0.02
    0.021456998 = product of:
      0.042913996 = sum of:
        0.042913996 = product of:
          0.08582799 = sum of:
            0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582799 = score(doc=768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Lahary, D.: ¬Le jeu de puzzle de l'acces aux catalogues : World Wide Web et/ou Z39.50 (1997) 0.02
    0.021456998 = product of:
      0.042913996 = sum of:
        0.042913996 = product of:
          0.08582799 = sum of:
            0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582799 = score(doc=925,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To access a remote catalogue the searcher can use the Z39.50 standard as interface, which requires appropriate software; or for databases accessible on the WWW use a common gateway interface. The multibase access advantage of Z39.50 can also be obtained through a Web navigator by inserting a Web server/Z39.50 client software connector: this can be located either on the search site, in an intermediary position or on the database site, so determining the range of databases which can be searched. Z39.50 also offers interesting possibilities for joint and local cataloguing: multibase searching can equally be realised on intranets
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The puzzling game of catalogue access: World Wide Web and/or Z39.50
  13. Condron, L.; Tittemore, C.P.: Library catalogs on the Web (2002) 0.02
    0.021456998 = product of:
      0.042913996 = sum of:
        0.042913996 = product of:
          0.08582799 = sum of:
            0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582799 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Moscoso, P.: Analisis y evaluacion de catalogos automatizados de acceso publico en entorno Web (1998) 0.02
    0.02123692 = product of:
      0.04247384 = sum of:
        0.04247384 = product of:
          0.08494768 = sum of:
            0.08494768 = weight(_text_:web in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08494768 = score(doc=3384,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents the results of an evaluation of the Spanish Web OPACs. A checklist approach was employed to access the interface and searching options. Evaluates main page, labels, text, instructional information, online help and page layout. The data gathered allow for the ranking of the OPACs, as well as the identification of weaknesses in the catalogues
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Analysis and evaluation of online public access catalogues in the Web
  15. Bates, M.J.: Improving user access to library catalog and portal information (2004) 0.02
    0.02123692 = product of:
      0.04247384 = sum of:
        0.04247384 = product of:
          0.08494768 = sum of:
            0.08494768 = weight(_text_:web in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08494768 = score(doc=2593,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture, Dr. Bates summarizes the research she recently conducted in her role as a Principal Investigator for the Library of Congress Action Plan on Bibliographic Control of Web Resources. Her investigations focused on three particular topics: User access vocabulary, Links among bibliographic families, and Staging of access to resources in the interface. From each of these perspectives, she shares her recommendations on how to achieve enhanced access to and display of records for selected Web resources across multiple systems.
    Footnote
    Vortrag, anläßlich: Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium: confronting the challenges of networked resources and the Web
  16. Recker, I.; Ronthaler, M.; Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS - Osnabrück Intelligent Research Information System : ein Hyperbase Front End System für OPACs (1996) 0.02
    0.021175914 = product of:
      0.042351827 = sum of:
        0.042351827 = product of:
          0.084703654 = sum of:
            0.084703654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084703654 = score(doc=4106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  17. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.02
    0.020332802 = product of:
      0.040665604 = sum of:
        0.040665604 = product of:
          0.08133121 = sum of:
            0.08133121 = weight(_text_:web in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08133121 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Content
    Foreword - Marshall Breeding Introduction - Sally Chambers 1. Next generation catalogues: what do users think? - Anne Christensen 2. Making search work for the library user - Till Kinstler 3. Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European Scene - Marshall Breeding 4. The mobile library catalogue - Lukas Koster and Driek Heesakkers 5. FRBRizing your catalogue - Rosemie Callewaert 6. Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web - Emmanuelle Bermes 7. Supporting digital scholarship: bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories - Karen Calhoun 8. Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention - Lorcan Dempsey.
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
  18. Slone, D.J.: ¬The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during Web interaction (2002) 0.02
    0.018770961 = product of:
      0.037541922 = sum of:
        0.037541922 = product of:
          0.075083844 = sum of:
            0.075083844 = weight(_text_:web in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075083844 = score(doc=5229,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Thirty-one patrons, who were selected by Slone to provide a range of age and experience, agreed when approached while using the catalog of the Wake County library system to try searching via the Internet. Fifteen searched the Wake County online catalog in this manner and 16 searched the World Wide Web, including that catalog. They were subjected to brief pre-structured taped interviews before and after their searches and observed during the searching process resulting in a log of behaviors, comments, pages accessed, and time spent. Data were analyzed across participants and categories. Web searches were characterized as linking, URL, search engine, within a site domain, and searching a web catalog; and participants by the number of these techniques used. Four used only one, 13 used two, 11 used three, two used four, and one all five. Participant experience was characterized as never used, used search engines, browsing experience, email experience, URL experience, catalog experience, and finally chat room/newsgroup experience. Sixteen percent of the participants had never used the Internet, 71% had used search engines, 65% had browsed, 58% had used email, 39% had used URLs, 39% had used online catalogs, and 32% had used chat rooms. The catalog was normally consulted before the web, where both were used, and experience with an online catalog assists in web use. Scrolling was found to be unpopular and practiced halfheartedly.
  19. Kopak, R.W.; Cherry, J.M.: Bibliographic displays and Web catalogues : user evaluations of three prototype displays (1998) 0.02
    0.018582305 = product of:
      0.03716461 = sum of:
        0.03716461 = product of:
          0.07432922 = sum of:
            0.07432922 = weight(_text_:web in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07432922 = score(doc=3379,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an evaluation study of 3 WWW based prototypes for bibliographic displays developed as part of an ongoing research project at the Faculty of Information Studies, Toronto University. The development of these prototypes builds upon results obtained in earlier phases of the project that addressed issues of both the content and form of bibliographic displays in OPACs. Anticipation of continued growth in the number of catalogues available through the WWW, combined with research evidence that existing Web based displays have not shown improvement over their text based counterparts, motivated the development of these prototypes for use on the Web. Reports findings from a focus group evaluation of the 3 prototypes and makes suggestions for future research
  20. Wätjen, H.-J.: Hypertextbasierte OPACs im World-wide Web (1996) 0.02
    0.01839171 = product of:
      0.03678342 = sum of:
        0.03678342 = product of:
          0.07356684 = sum of:
            0.07356684 = weight(_text_:web in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07356684 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 155
  • el 10
  • m 5
  • s 5
  • x 5
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…