Search (2668 results, page 1 of 134)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.16
    0.1618816 = sum of:
      0.08274635 = product of:
        0.24823904 = sum of:
          0.24823904 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24823904 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4416923 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.07913525 = sum of:
        0.03678342 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03678342 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052098576 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042351827 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052098576 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.10
    0.09587004 = product of:
      0.19174008 = sum of:
        0.19174008 = sum of:
          0.14232962 = weight(_text_:web in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14232962 = score(doc=4855,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.8371137 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Chung, W.; Chen, H.: Browsing the underdeveloped Web : an experiment on the Arabic Medical Web Directory (2009) 0.09
    0.087488174 = product of:
      0.17497635 = sum of:
        0.17497635 = sum of:
          0.13262452 = weight(_text_:web in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13262452 = score(doc=2733,freq=26.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.780033 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                  26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
          0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 2733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042351827 = score(doc=2733,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2733, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While the Web has grown significantly in recent years, some portions of the Web remain largely underdeveloped, as shown in a lack of high-quality content and functionality. An example is the Arabic Web, in which a lack of well-structured Web directories limits users' ability to browse for Arabic resources. In this research, we proposed an approach to building Web directories for the underdeveloped Web and developed a proof-of-concept prototype called the Arabic Medical Web Directory (AMedDir) that supports browsing of over 5,000 Arabic medical Web sites and pages organized in a hierarchical structure. We conducted an experiment involving Arab participants and found that the AMedDir significantly outperformed two benchmark Arabic Web directories in terms of browsing effectiveness, efficiency, information quality, and user satisfaction. Participants expressed strong preference for the AMedDir and provided many positive comments. This research thus contributes to developing a useful Web directory for organizing the information in the Arabic medical domain and to a better understanding of how to support browsing on the underdeveloped Web.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:57:50
  4. Shen, X.; Li, D.; Shen, C.: Evaluating China's university library Web sites using correspondence analysis (2006) 0.08
    0.08306804 = product of:
      0.16613609 = sum of:
        0.16613609 = sum of:
          0.10966698 = weight(_text_:web in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10966698 = score(doc=5277,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
          0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056469105 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, many evaluations of Web sites have been conducted, and relevant researches have also been carried out in academic circles. Correspondence analysis is introduced in this paper to evaluate university library Web sites through building a correspondence analysis model. This paper gives suggestions as to how to construct university library Web sites based on analysis and summary of evaluation results, in a bid to strengthen the construction of university library Web sites.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:40:18
  5. Sauermann, L.; Kiesel, M.; Schumacher, K.; Bernardi, A.: Semantic Desktop (2009) 0.08
    0.08147512 = product of:
      0.16295023 = sum of:
        0.16295023 = sum of:
          0.11353976 = weight(_text_:web in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11353976 = score(doc=2416,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=2416,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft aussehen könnte und wo das Semantic Web neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet. Dazu werden Ansätze aus dem Bereich Semantic Web, Knowledge Representation, Desktop-Anwendungen und Visualisierung vorgestellt, die es uns ermöglichen, die bestehenden Daten eines Benutzers neu zu interpretieren und zu verwenden. Dabei bringt die Kombination von Semantic Web und Desktop Computern besondere Vorteile - ein Paradigma, das unter dem Titel Semantic Desktop bekannt ist. Die beschriebenen Möglichkeiten der Applikationsintegration sind aber nicht auf den Desktop beschränkt, sondern können genauso in Web-Anwendungen Verwendung finden.
    Date
    3. 1.2012 16:00:22
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  6. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.08
    0.08147512 = product of:
      0.16295023 = sum of:
        0.16295023 = sum of:
          0.11353976 = weight(_text_:web in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11353976 = score(doc=4184,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Medium Internet ist im Wandel, und mit ihm ändern sich seine Publikations- und Rezeptionsbedingungen. Welche Chancen bieten die momentan parallel diskutierten Zukunftsentwürfe von Social Web und Semantic Web? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage beschäftigt sich der Beitrag mit den Grundlagen beider Modelle unter den Aspekten Anwendungsbezug und Technologie, beleuchtet darüber hinaus jedoch auch deren Unzulänglichkeiten sowie den Mehrwert einer mediengerechten Kombination. Am Beispiel des grammatischen Online-Informationssystems grammis wird eine Strategie zur integrativen Nutzung der jeweiligen Stärken skizziert.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
    Source
    Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web, Band 1. Hrsg.: A. Zerfaß u.a
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.08
    0.07913525 = product of:
      0.1582705 = sum of:
        0.1582705 = sum of:
          0.07356684 = weight(_text_:web in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07356684 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.084703654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084703654 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  8. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.08
    0.078642875 = product of:
      0.15728575 = sum of:
        0.15728575 = sum of:
          0.08669936 = weight(_text_:web in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08669936 = score(doc=1066,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.07058638 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07058638 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  9. Panzer, M.: Cool URIs for the DDC : towards Web-scale accessibility of a large classification system (2008) 0.08
    0.07727912 = product of:
      0.15455824 = sum of:
        0.15455824 = sum of:
          0.09808913 = weight(_text_:web in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09808913 = score(doc=2629,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
          0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056469105 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The report discusses metadata strategies employed and problems encountered during the first step of transforming the DDC into a Web information resource. It focuses on the process of URI design, with regard to W3C recommendations and Semantic Web paradigms. Special emphasis is placed on usefulness of the URIs for RESTful web services.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.08
    0.07727912 = product of:
      0.15455824 = sum of:
        0.15455824 = sum of:
          0.09808913 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09808913 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056469105 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  11. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.08
    0.07726393 = product of:
      0.15452786 = sum of:
        0.15452786 = sum of:
          0.10511739 = weight(_text_:web in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10511739 = score(doc=1026,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.08
    0.07726393 = product of:
      0.15452786 = sum of:
        0.15452786 = sum of:
          0.10511739 = weight(_text_:web in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10511739 = score(doc=167,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Hsu, C.-N.; Chang, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Lu, J.-J.; Chang, C.-C.: Reconfigurable Web wrapper agents for biological information integration (2005) 0.07
    0.0707389 = product of:
      0.1414778 = sum of:
        0.1414778 = sum of:
          0.106184594 = weight(_text_:web in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.106184594 = score(doc=5263,freq=24.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.6245262 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
                4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                  24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
          0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03529319 = score(doc=5263,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of biological data is transferred and exchanged in overwhelming volumes on the World Wide Web. How to rapidly capture, utilize, and integrate the information on the Internet to discover valuable biological knowledge is one of the most critical issues in bioinformatics. Many information integration systems have been proposed for integrating biological data. These systems usually rely on an intermediate software layer called wrappers to access connected information sources. Wrapper construction for Web data sources is often specially hand coded to accommodate the differences between each Web site. However, programming a Web wrapper requires substantial programming skill, and is time-consuming and hard to maintain. In this article we provide a solution for rapidly building software agents that can serve as Web wrappers for biological information integration. We define an XML-based language called Web Navigation Description Language (WNDL), to model a Web-browsing session. A WNDL script describes how to locate the data, extract the data, and combine the data. By executing different WNDL scripts, we can automate virtually all types of Web-browsing sessions. We also describe IEPAD (Information Extraction Based on Pattern Discovery), a data extractor based on pattern discovery techniques. IEPAD allows our software agents to automatically discover the extraction rules to extract the contents of a structurally formatted Web page. With a programming-by-example authoring tool, a user can generate a complete Web wrapper agent by browsing the target Web sites. We built a variety of biological applications to demonstrate the feasibility of our approach.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:36:42
  14. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.07
    0.070708394 = product of:
      0.14141679 = sum of:
        0.14141679 = sum of:
          0.08494768 = weight(_text_:web in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08494768 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056469105 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter presents ontologies and their role in the creation of the Semantic Web. Ontologies hold special interest, because they are very closely related to the way we understand the world. They provide common understanding, the very first step to successful communication. In following sections, we will present ontologies, how they are created and used. We will describe available tools for specifying and working with ontologies.
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.07
    0.06983581 = product of:
      0.13967162 = sum of:
        0.13967162 = sum of:
          0.0973198 = weight(_text_:web in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0973198 = score(doc=2556,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042351827 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  16. Mundle, K.; Huie, H.; Bangalore, N.S.: ARL Library Catalog Department Web sites : an evaluative study (2006) 0.07
    0.06847861 = product of:
      0.13695721 = sum of:
        0.13695721 = sum of:
          0.10166402 = weight(_text_:web in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10166402 = score(doc=771,freq=22.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                  22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03529319 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User-friendly and content-rich Web sites are indispensable for any knowledge-based organization. Web site evaluation studies point to ways to improve the efficiency and usability of Web sites. Library catalog or technical services department Web sites have proliferated in the past few years, but there is no systematic and accepted method that evaluates the performance of these Web sites. An earlier study by Mundle, Zhao, and Bangalore evaluated catalog department Web sites within the consortium of the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) libraries, proposed a model to assess these Web sites, and recommended desirable features for them. The present study was undertaken to test the model further and to assess the recommended features. The study evaluated the catalog department Web sites of Association of Research Libraries members. It validated the model proposed, and confirmed the use of the performance index (PI) as an objective measure to assess the usability or workability of a catalog department Web site. The model advocates using a PI of 1.5 as the benchmark for catalog department Web site evaluation by employing the study tool and scoring method suggested in this paper.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Ferris, A.M.: If you buy it, will they use it? : a case study on the use of Classification web (2006) 0.07
    0.06761923 = product of:
      0.13523845 = sum of:
        0.13523845 = sum of:
          0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08582799 = score(doc=88,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study conducted at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU-Boulder) to assess the extent to which its catalogers were using Classification Web (Class Web), the subscription-based, online cataloging documentation resource provided by the Library of Congress. In addition, this paper will explore assumptions made by management regarding CU-Boulder catalogers' use of the product, possible reasons for the lower-than-expected use, and recommendations for promoting a more efficient and cost-effective use of Class Web at other institutions similar to CU-Boulder.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.07
    0.06761923 = product of:
      0.13523845 = sum of:
        0.13523845 = sum of:
          0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08582799 = score(doc=2640,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049410466 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.07
    0.06622623 = product of:
      0.13245246 = sum of:
        0.13245246 = sum of:
          0.09010062 = weight(_text_:web in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09010062 = score(doc=177,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
          0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042351827 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  20. Herrera-Viedma, E.; Pasi, G.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Porcel; C.: Evaluating the information quality of Web sites : a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words (2006) 0.07
    0.06611301 = product of:
      0.13222602 = sum of:
        0.13222602 = sum of:
          0.09693283 = weight(_text_:web in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09693283 = score(doc=5286,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.03529319 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03529319 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052098576 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An evaluation methodology based on fuzzy computing with words aimed at measuring the information quality of Web sites containing documents is presented. This methodology is qualitative and user oriented because it generates linguistic recommendations on the information quality of the content-based Web sites based on users' perceptions. It is composed of two main components, an evaluation scheme to analyze the information quality of Web sites and a measurement method to generate the linguistic recommendations. The evaluation scheme is based on both technical criteria related to the Web site structure and criteria related to the content of information on the Web sites. It is user driven because the chosen criteria are easily understandable by the users, in such a way that Web visitors can assess them by means of linguistic evaluation judgments. The measurement method is user centered because it generates linguistic recommendations of the Web sites based on the visitors' linguistic evaluation judgments. To combine the linguistic evaluation judgments we introduce two new majority guided linguistic aggregation operators, the Majority guided Linguistic Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (MLIOWA) and weighted MLIOWA operators, which generate the linguistic recommendations according to the majority of the evaluation judgments provided by different visitors. The use of this methodology could improve tasks such as information filtering and evaluation on the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:05:46
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web

Languages

Types

Themes