-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.06
0.055050008 = product of:
0.110100016 = sum of:
0.110100016 = sum of:
0.060689554 = weight(_text_:web in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060689554 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049410466 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Object
- Web of Science
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024956053 = product of:
0.049912106 = sum of:
0.049912106 = product of:
0.09982421 = sum of:
0.09982421 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09982421 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999)
0.02
0.021456998 = product of:
0.042913996 = sum of:
0.042913996 = product of:
0.08582799 = sum of:
0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08582799 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Smith, A.G.: Web links as analogues of citations (2004)
0.02
0.021456998 = product of:
0.042913996 = sum of:
0.042913996 = product of:
0.08582799 = sum of:
0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08582799 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Daquino, M.; Peroni, S.; Shotton, D.; Colavizza, G.; Ghavimi, B.; Lauscher, A.; Mayr, P.; Romanello, M.; Zumstein, P.: ¬The OpenCitations Data Model (2020)
0.02
0.015927691 = product of:
0.031855382 = sum of:
0.031855382 = product of:
0.063710764 = sum of:
0.063710764 = weight(_text_:web in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063710764 = score(doc=38,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A variety of schemas and ontologies are currently used for the machine-readable description of bibliographic entities and citations. This diversity, and the reuse of the same ontology terms with different nuances, generates inconsistencies in data. Adoption of a single data model would facilitate data integration tasks regardless of the data supplier or context application. In this paper we present the OpenCitations Data Model (OCDM), a generic data model for describing bibliographic entities and citations, developed using Semantic Web technologies. We also evaluate the effective reusability of OCDM according to ontology evaluation practices, mention existing users of OCDM, and discuss the use and impact of OCDM in the wider open science community.
- Content
- Erschienen in: The Semantic Web - ISWC 2020, 19th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Greece, November 2-6, 2020, Proceedings, Part II. Vgl.: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_28.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
