Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Sanderson, M."
  1. Tann, C.; Sanderson, M.: Are Web-based informational queries changing? (2009) 0.02
    0.021456998 = product of:
      0.042913996 = sum of:
        0.042913996 = product of:
          0.08582799 = sum of:
            0.08582799 = weight(_text_:web in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582799 = score(doc=2852,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This brief communication describes the results of a questionnaire examining certain aspects of the Web-based information seeking practices of university students. The results are contrasted with past work showing that queries to Web search engines can be assigned to one of a series of categories: navigational, informational, and transactional. The survey results suggest that a large group of queries, which in the past would have been classified as informational, have become at least partially navigational. We contend that this change has occurred because of the rise of large Web sites holding particular types of information, such as Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database.
  2. Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008) 0.01
    0.013004904 = product of:
      0.026009807 = sum of:
        0.026009807 = product of:
          0.052019615 = sum of:
            0.052019615 = weight(_text_:web in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052019615 = score(doc=1867,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052098576 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A brief communication appearing in this journal ranked UK-based LIS and (some) IR academics by their h-index using data derived from the Thomson ISI Web of Science(TM) (WoS). In this brief communication, the same academics were re-ranked, using other popular citation databases. It was found that for academics who publish more in computer science forums, their h was significantly different due to highly cited papers missed by WoS; consequently, their rank changed substantially. The study was widened to a broader set of UK-based LIS and IR academics in which results showed similar statistically significant differences. A variant of h, hmx, was introduced that allowed a ranking of the academics using all citation databases together.
    Object
    Web of Science