-
Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995)
0.25
0.25262567 = product of:
0.30315083 = sum of:
0.11642214 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11642214 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.0068221292 = weight(_text_:in in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068221292 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.106637046 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106637046 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.03953255 = weight(_text_:u in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03953255 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.033736963 = product of:
0.067473926 = sum of:
0.067473926 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067473926 = score(doc=5181,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Colace, F.; Santo, M. De; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Weighted word pairs for query expansion (2015)
0.24
0.24439123 = product of:
0.2932695 = sum of:
0.11642214 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11642214 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.0068221292 = weight(_text_:in in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068221292 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.106637046 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106637046 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.03953255 = weight(_text_:u in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03953255 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.023855632 = product of:
0.047711264 = sum of:
0.047711264 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047711264 = score(doc=2687,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes a novel query expansion method to improve accuracy of text retrieval systems. Our method makes use of a minimal relevance feedback to expand the initial query with a structured representation composed of weighted pairs of words. Such a structure is obtained from the relevance feedback through a method for pairs of words selection based on the Probabilistic Topic Model. We compared our method with other baseline query expansion schemes and methods. Evaluations performed on TREC-8 demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method with respect to the baseline.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Li, N.; Sun, J.: Improving Chinese term association from the linguistic perspective (2017)
0.21
0.20650584 = product of:
0.24780701 = sum of:
0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09979041 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.00826967 = weight(_text_:in in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00826967 = score(doc=3381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.014458697 = product of:
0.028917395 = sum of:
0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028917395 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The study aims to solve how to construct the semantic relations of specific domain terms by applying linguistic rules. The semantic structure analysis at the morpheme level was used for semantic measure, and a morpheme-based term association model was proposed by improving and combining the literal-based similarity algorithm and co-occurrence relatedness methods. This study provides a novel insight into the method of semantic analysis and calculation by morpheme parsing, and the proposed solution is feasible for the automatic association of compound terms. The results show that this approach could be used to construct appropriate term association and form a reasonable structural knowledge graph. However, due to linguistic differences, the viability and effectiveness of the use of our method in non-Chinese linguistic environments should be verified.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Symonds, M.; Bruza, P.; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.; Sitbon, L.; Turner, I.: Automatic query expansion : a structural linguistic perspective (2014)
0.19
0.19164318 = product of:
0.22997183 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.012892614 = weight(_text_:in in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012892614 = score(doc=1338,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.029513694 = product of:
0.05902739 = sum of:
0.05902739 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05902739 = score(doc=1338,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- A user's query is considered to be an imprecise description of their information need. Automatic query expansion is the process of reformulating the original query with the goal of improving retrieval effectiveness. Many successful query expansion techniques model syntagmatic associations that infer two terms co-occur more often than by chance in natural language. However, structural linguistics relies on both syntagmatic and paradigmatic associations to deduce the meaning of a word. Given the success of dependency-based approaches to query expansion and the reliance on word meanings in the query formulation process, we argue that modeling both syntagmatic and paradigmatic information in the query expansion process improves retrieval effectiveness. This article develops and evaluates a new query expansion technique that is based on a formal, corpus-based model of word meaning that models syntagmatic and paradigmatic associations. We demonstrate that when sufficient statistical information exists, as in the case of longer queries, including paradigmatic information alone provides significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness across a wide variety of data sets. More generally, when our new query expansion approach is applied to large-scale web retrieval it demonstrates significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness over a strong baseline system, based on a commercial search engine.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Järvelin, A.; Keskustalo, H.; Sormunen, E.; Saastamoinen, M.; Kettunen, K.: Information retrieval from historical newspaper collections in highly inflectional languages : a query expansion approach (2016)
0.19
0.1885685 = product of:
0.22628221 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.014618848 = weight(_text_:in in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014618848 = score(doc=3223,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.02409783 = product of:
0.04819566 = sum of:
0.04819566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04819566 = score(doc=3223,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The aim of the study was to test whether query expansion by approximate string matching methods is beneficial in retrieval from historical newspaper collections in a language rich with compounds and inflectional forms (Finnish). First, approximate string matching methods were used to generate lists of index words most similar to contemporary query terms in a digitized newspaper collection from the 1800s. Top index word variants were categorized to estimate the appropriate query expansion ranges in the retrieval test. Second, the effectiveness of approximate string matching methods, automatically generated inflectional forms, and their combinations were measured in a Cranfield-style test. Finally, a detailed topic-level analysis of test results was conducted. In the index of historical newspaper collection the occurrences of a word typically spread to many linguistic and historical variants along with optical character recognition (OCR) errors. All query expansion methods improved the baseline results. Extensive expansion of around 30 variants for each query word was required to achieve the highest performance improvement. Query expansion based on approximate string matching was superior to using the inflectional forms of the query words, showing that coverage of the different types of variation is more important than precision in handling one type of variation.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Renker, L.: Exploration von Textkorpora : Topic Models als Grundlage der Interaktion (2015)
0.18
0.17981349 = product of:
0.21577619 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.016161747 = weight(_text_:in in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016161747 = score(doc=2380,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.012048915 = product of:
0.02409783 = sum of:
0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02409783 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Das Internet birgt schier endlose Informationen. Ein zentrales Problem besteht heutzutage darin diese auch zugänglich zu machen. Es ist ein fundamentales Domänenwissen erforderlich, um in einer Volltextsuche die korrekten Suchanfragen zu formulieren. Das ist jedoch oftmals nicht vorhanden, so dass viel Zeit aufgewandt werden muss, um einen Überblick des behandelten Themas zu erhalten. In solchen Situationen findet sich ein Nutzer in einem explorativen Suchvorgang, in dem er sich schrittweise an ein Thema heranarbeiten muss. Für die Organisation von Daten werden mittlerweile ganz selbstverständlich Verfahren des Machine Learnings verwendet. In den meisten Fällen bleiben sie allerdings für den Anwender unsichtbar. Die interaktive Verwendung in explorativen Suchprozessen könnte die menschliche Urteilskraft enger mit der maschinellen Verarbeitung großer Datenmengen verbinden. Topic Models sind ebensolche Verfahren. Sie finden in einem Textkorpus verborgene Themen, die sich relativ gut von Menschen interpretieren lassen und sind daher vielversprechend für die Anwendung in explorativen Suchprozessen. Nutzer können damit beim Verstehen unbekannter Quellen unterstützt werden. Bei der Betrachtung entsprechender Forschungsarbeiten fiel auf, dass Topic Models vorwiegend zur Erzeugung statischer Visualisierungen verwendet werden. Das Sensemaking ist ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der explorativen Suche und wird dennoch nur in sehr geringem Umfang genutzt, um algorithmische Neuerungen zu begründen und in einen umfassenden Kontext zu setzen. Daraus leitet sich die Vermutung ab, dass die Verwendung von Modellen des Sensemakings und die nutzerzentrierte Konzeption von explorativen Suchen, neue Funktionen für die Interaktion mit Topic Models hervorbringen und einen Kontext für entsprechende Forschungsarbeiten bieten können.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Niemi, T.; Jämsen, J.: ¬A query language for discovering semantic associations, part II : sample queries and query evaluation (2007)
0.18
0.1791867 = product of:
0.21502405 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.015409621 = weight(_text_:in in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015409621 = score(doc=580,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.012048915 = product of:
0.02409783 = sum of:
0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02409783 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- In our query language introduced in Part I (Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1559-1568) the user can formulate queries to find out (possibly complex) semantic relationships among entities. In this article we demonstrate the usage of our query language and discuss the new applications that it supports. We categorize several query types and give sample queries. The query types are categorized based on whether the entities specified in a query are known or unknown to the user in advance, and whether text information in documents is utilized. Natural language is used to represent the results of queries in order to facilitate correct interpretation by the user. We discuss briefly the issues related to the prototype implementation of the query language and show that an independent operation like Rho (Sheth et al., 2005; Anyanwu & Sheth, 2002, 2003), which presupposes entities of interest to be known in advance, is exceedingly inefficient in emulating the behavior of our query language. The discussion also covers potential problems, and challenges for future work.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Niemi, T.; Jämsen , J.: ¬A query language for discovering semantic associations, part I : approach and formal definition of query primitives (2007)
0.18
0.17783102 = product of:
0.21339723 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0137827825 = score(doc=591,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.012048915 = product of:
0.02409783 = sum of:
0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02409783 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- In contemporary query languages, the user is responsible for navigation among semantically related data. Because of the huge amount of data and the complex structural relationships among data in modern applications, it is unrealistic to suppose that the user could know completely the content and structure of the available information. There are several query languages whose purpose is to facilitate navigation in unknown structures of databases. However, the background assumption of these languages is that the user knows how data are related to each other semantically in the structure at hand. So far only little attention has been paid to how unknown semantic associations among available data can be discovered. We address this problem in this article. A semantic association between two entities can be constructed if a sequence of relationships expressed explicitly in a database can be found that connects these entities to each other. This sequence may contain several other entities through which the original entities are connected to each other indirectly. We introduce an expressive and declarative query language for discovering semantic associations. Our query language is able, for example, to discover semantic associations between entities for which only some of the characteristics are known. Further, it integrates the manipulation of semantic associations with the manipulation of documents that may contain information on entities in semantic associations.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Frederichs, A.: Natürlichsprachige Abfrage und 3-D-Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen (2007)
0.18
0.17753787 = product of:
0.21304545 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.008440197 = weight(_text_:in in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008440197 = score(doc=566,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.017039739 = product of:
0.034079477 = sum of:
0.034079477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034079477 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Eine der größten Herausforderungen für alle technischen Anwendungen ist die sogenannte Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle, also der Problemkreis, wie der bedienende Mensch mit der zu bedienenden Technik kommunizieren kann. Waren die Benutzungsschnittstellen bis Ende der Achtziger Jahre vor allem durch die Notwendigkeit des Benutzers geprägt, sich an die Erfordernisse der Maschine anzupassen, so wurde mit Durchsetzung grafischer Benutzungsoberflächen zunehmend versucht, die Bedienbarkeit so zu gestalten, dass ein Mensch auch ohne größere Einarbeitung in die Lage versetzt werden sollte, seine Befehle der Technik - letztlich also dem Computer - zu übermitteln. Trotz aller Fortschritte auf diesem Gebiet blieb immer die Anforderung, der Mensch solle auf die ihm natürlichste Art und Weise kommunizieren können, mit menschlicher Sprache. Diese Anforderung gilt gerade auch für das Retrieval von Informationen: Warum ist es nötig, die Nutzung von Booleschen Operatoren zu erlernen, nur um eine Suchanfrage stellen zu können? Ein anderes Thema ist die Frage nach der Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen, die sich der Herausforderung stellt, in einem geradezu uferlos sich ausweitenden Informationsangebot weiterhin den Überblick behalten und relevante Informationen schnellstmöglich finden zu können.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kummer, N.: Indexierungstechniken für das japanische Retrieval (2006)
0.17
0.17247948 = product of:
0.2587192 = sum of:
0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 5979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007796719 = score(doc=5979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5979)
0.17235151 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17235151 = score(doc=5979,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.6722399 = fieldWeight in 5979, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5979)
0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 5979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045180056 = score(doc=5979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5979)
0.03339093 = product of:
0.06678186 = sum of:
0.06678186 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06678186 = score(doc=5979,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5979, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5979)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die Herausforderungen, die die japanische Sprache aufgrund der besonderen Struktur ihres Schriftsystems an das Information Retrieval stellt und präsentiert Strategien und Ansätze für die Indexierung japanischer Dokumente. Im Besonderen soll auf die Effektivität aussprachebasierter (yomi-based) Indexierung sowie Fusion verschiedener einzelner Indexierungsansätze eingegangen werden.
- Source
- Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Experimentelles und praktisches Information Retrieval : Festschrift für Gerhard Lustig (1992)
0.13
0.133362 = product of:
0.200043 = sum of:
0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011695079 = score(doc=4,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.058690622 = weight(_text_:u in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058690622 = score(doc=4,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.3759712 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.038254116 = product of:
0.07650823 = sum of:
0.07650823 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07650823 = score(doc=4,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SALTON, G.: Effective text understanding in information retrieval; KRAUSE, J.: Intelligentes Information retrieval; FUHR, N.: Konzepte zur Gestaltung zukünftiger Information-Retrieval-Systeme; HÜTHER, H.: Überlegungen zu einem mathematischen Modell für die Type-Token-, die Grundform-Token und die Grundform-Type-Relation; KNORZ, G.: Automatische Generierung inferentieller Links in und zwischen Hyperdokumenten; KONRAD, E.: Zur Effektivitätsbewertung von Information-Retrieval-Systemen; HENRICHS, N.: Retrievalunterstützung durch automatisch generierte Wortfelder; LÜCK, W., W. RITTBERGER u. M. SCHWANTNER: Der Einsatz des Automatischen Indexierungs- und Retrieval-System (AIR) im Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe; REIMER, U.: Verfahren der Automatischen Indexierung. Benötigtes Vorwissen und Ansätze zu seiner automatischen Akquisition: Ein Überblick; ENDRES-NIGGEMEYER, B.: Dokumentrepräsentation: Ein individuelles prozedurales Modell des Abstracting, des Indexierens und Klassifizierens; SEELBACH, D.: Zur Entwicklung von zwei- und mehrsprachigen lexikalischen Datenbanken und Terminologiedatenbanken; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Der Einfluß der Sprachbarrieren in Europa und Möglichkeiten zu ihrer Minderung; LENDERS, W.: Wörter zwischen Welt und Wissen; PANYR, J.: Frames, Thesauri und automatische Klassifikation (Clusteranalyse): HAHN, U.: Forschungsstrategien und Erkenntnisinteressen in der anwendungsorientierten automatischen Sprachverarbeitung. Überlegungen zu einer ingenieurorientierten Computerlinguistik; KUHLEN, R.: Hypertext und Information Retrieval - mehr als Browsing und Suche.
-
Schwarz, C.: Probleme der syntaktischen Indexierung (1986)
0.11
0.111367315 = product of:
0.33410195 = sum of:
0.24374183 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 8180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24374183 = score(doc=8180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.95069075 = fieldWeight in 8180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8180)
0.09036011 = weight(_text_:u in 8180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09036011 = score(doc=8180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.57884544 = fieldWeight in 8180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8180)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Informationslinguistische Texterschließung. Hrsg.: C. Schwarz u. G. Thurmair
-
Gerstenkorn, A.: Indexierung mit Nominalgruppen (1980)
0.11
0.10959171 = product of:
0.3287751 = sum of:
0.30467728 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30467728 = score(doc=6685,freq=8.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
1.1883634 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.02409783 = product of:
0.04819566 = sum of:
0.04819566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04819566 = score(doc=6685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 6685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die Indexierung mit Nominalgruppen ist eine konsequente Fortsetzung der Entwicklung von der gleichordnenden zur syntaktischen Indexierung. Nominalgruppen eignen sich besonders zur Bezeichnung komplexer Begriffe (Themen) und sind benutzerfreundlich. Bei einer automatischen Indexierung mit Nominalgruppen sind keine vollständigen Satzanalysen nötig, auch Systeme mit einem partiellen Parser liefern brauchbare Ergebnisse. Das Problem eines Retrieval mit Nominalgruppen ist noch zu lösen
-
Strötgen, R.; Mandl, T.; Schneider, R.: Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines Question Answering Systems im Rahmen des Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) (2006)
0.10
0.10105564 = product of:
0.15158345 = sum of:
0.0058475393 = weight(_text_:in in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058475393 = score(doc=5981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=5981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=5981,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.020447686 = product of:
0.040895373 = sum of:
0.040895373 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040895373 = score(doc=5981,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5981, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5981)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- Question Answering Systeme versuchen, zu konkreten Fragen eine korrekte Antwort zu liefern. Dazu durchsuchen sie einen Dokumentenbestand und extrahieren einen Bruchteil eines Dokuments. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Entwicklung eines modularen Systems zum multilingualen Question Answering. Die Strategie bei der Entwicklung zielte auf eine schnellstmögliche Verwendbarkeit eines modularen Systems, das auf viele frei verfügbare Ressourcen zugreift. Das System integriert Module zur Erkennung von Eigennamen, zu Indexierung und Retrieval, elektronische Wörterbücher, Online-Übersetzungswerkzeuge sowie Textkorpora zu Trainings- und Testzwecken und implementiert eigene Ansätze zu den Bereichen der Frage- und AntwortTaxonomien, zum Passagenretrieval und zum Ranking alternativer Antworten.
- Source
- Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
-
Stock, W.G.: Textwortmethode : Norbert Henrichs zum 65. (3) (2000)
0.08
0.077326745 = product of:
0.15465349 = sum of:
0.013504315 = weight(_text_:in in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013504315 = score(doc=4891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.12187091 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12187091 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.019278264 = product of:
0.038556527 = sum of:
0.038556527 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038556527 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Nur wenige Dokumentationsmethoden werden mit dem Namen ihrer Entwickler assoziiert. Ausnahmen sind Melvil Dewey (DDC), S.R. Ranganathan (Colon Classification) - und Norbert Henrichs. Seine Textwortmethode ermöglicht die Indexierung und das Retrieval von Literatur aus Fachgebieten, die keine allseits akzeptierte Fachterminologie vorweisen, also viele Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, vorneweg die Philosophie. Für den Einsatz in der elektronischen Philosophie-Dokumentation hat Henrichs in den späten sechziger Jahren die Textwortmethode entworfen. Er ist damit nicht nur einer der Pioniere der Anwendung der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung in der Informationspraxis, sondern auch der Pionier bei der Dokumentation terminologisch nicht starrer Fachsprachen
-
Sienel, J.; Weiss, M.; Laube, M.: Sprachtechnologien für die Informationsgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts (2000)
0.07
0.07418535 = product of:
0.1483707 = sum of:
0.11760412 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11760412 = score(doc=5557,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43900353 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.014618848 = weight(_text_:in in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014618848 = score(doc=5557,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.016147735 = product of:
0.03229547 = sum of:
0.03229547 = weight(_text_:22 in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03229547 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- In den vergangenen Jahren hat sich die Entwicklung, Sprache als Schnittstelle zwischen Mensch und Maschine einzusetzen, zunehmend an Bedeutung gewonnen. Die steigende Verarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit der Prozessoren ermöglicht es heute, selbst sehr komplexe Aufgaben wie Diktiersysteme auf handelsüblichen PCs verfügbar zu machen. Ebenso haben sich Verfahren weiterentwickelt und die Erkennungsleistung konnte gesteigert werden. Insbesondere im mobilen Umfeld wird sich Sprache als notwendig erweisen, um den Widerspruch, immer komplexere Funktionalität in immer kleineren und leichteren Terminals unterzubringen, aufzulösen. In diesem Umfeld können auch andere Modalitäten, wie Handschrift oder Gestik, integriert werden. Eine der Hauptanwendungen in mobiler Umgebung wird der Zugriff auf das Internet werden: um schnell und umfassend zu den benötigten Information zu gelangen, können intelligente Agenten eine mögliche Hilfe darstellen. Sie sind in Lage, die Informationen bezüglich ihrer Relevanz für den Nutzer zu beurteilen und fassen die Inhalte zusammen, die sich auf den kleinen Displays, oder akustisch wiedergeben lassen. Ist das gefundene Dokument in einer dein Benutzer fremden Sprache verfaßt, kann es automatisch übersetzt werden. Natürlich werden die benötigten Technologien nicht alle in einem Endgerät untergebracht werden können, deshalb wird bereits heute in Standardisierungsgremien untersucht, wie verteilte Architekturen helfen können, den Zugriff auf Informationen immer, überall und jedem verfügbaren Endgerät zugänglich zu machen. Das vom BMWi geförderte Projekt "Mobiler Multimedia-Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft" will diesen Ansatz verfolgen. Dabei werden auch die sozialen und arbeitsrechtlichen Aspekte untersucht
- Date
- 26.12.2000 13:22:17
- Source
- Sprachtechnologie für eine dynamische Wirtschaft im Medienzeitalter - Language technologies for dynamic business in the age of the media - L'ingénierie linguistique au service de la dynamisation économique à l'ère du multimédia: Tagungsakten der XXVI. Jahrestagung der Internationalen Vereinigung Sprache und Wirtschaft e.V., 23.-25.11.2000, Fachhochschule Köln. Hrsg.: K.-D. Schmitz
-
Jacquemin, C.: Spotting and discovering terms through natural language processing (2001)
0.07
0.07155104 = product of:
0.14310208 = sum of:
0.008440197 = weight(_text_:in in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008440197 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.10771969 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10771969 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.42014992 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.026942192 = product of:
0.053884383 = sum of:
0.053884383 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053884383 = score(doc=119,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- In this book Christian Jacquemin shows how the power of natural language processing (NLP) can be used to advance text indexing and information retrieval (IR). Jacquemin's novel tool is FASTR, a parser that normalizes terms and recognizes term variants. Since there are more meanings in a language than there are words, FASTR uses a metagrammar composed of shallow linguistic transformations that describe the morphological, syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic variations of words and terms. The acquired parsed terms can then be applied for precise retrieval and assembly of information. The use of a corpus-based unification grammar to define, recognize, and combine term variants from their base forms allows for intelligent information access to, or "linguistic data tuning" of, heterogeneous texts. FASTR can be used to do automatic controlled indexing, to carry out content-based Web searches through conceptually related alternative query formulations, to abstract scientific and technical extracts, and even to translate and collect terms from multilingual material. Jacquemin provides a comprehensive account of the method and implementation of this innovative retrieval technique for text processing.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 28(2001) no.3, S.152-154 (L. Da Sylva)
- RSWK
- Automatische Indexierung / Computerlinguistik / Information Retrieval
- Subject
- Automatische Indexierung / Computerlinguistik / Information Retrieval
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.07
0.06633358 = product of:
0.13266715 = sum of:
0.0058475393 = weight(_text_:in in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058475393 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.03541643 = product of:
0.07083286 = sum of:
0.07083286 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083286 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Werner, H.: Indexierung auf linguistischer Grundlage am Beispiel von JUDO-DS(1) (1982)
0.06
0.06483382 = product of:
0.19450144 = sum of:
0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011695079 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
0.18280637 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18280637 = score(doc=3017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.71301806 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1981, Mainz, 5.-8.10.1981: Kleincomputer in Information und Dokumentation. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
SIGIR'92 : Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1992)
0.06
0.063301936 = product of:
0.12660387 = sum of:
0.010233194 = weight(_text_:in in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010233194 = score(doc=6671,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.15780272 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
0.088397466 = weight(_text_:u in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088397466 = score(doc=6671,freq=40.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.56627274 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
0.02797321 = product of:
0.05594642 = sum of:
0.05594642 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05594642 = score(doc=6671,freq=22.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.3879561 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- The conference was organized by the Royal School of Librarianship in Copenhagen and was held in cooperation with AICA-GLIR (Italy), BCS-IRSG (UK), DD (Denmark), GI (Germany), INRIA (France). It had support from Apple Computer, Denmark. The volume contains the 32 papers and reports on the two panel sessions, moderated by W.B. Croft, and R. Kovetz, respectively
- Content
- HARMAN, D.: Relevance feedback revisited; AALBERSBERG, I.J.: Incremental relevance feedback; TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J.: Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process; LEWIS, D.D.: An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task; BLOSSEVILLE, M.J., G. HÉBRAIL, M.G. MONTEIL u. N. PÉNOT: Automatic document classification: natural language processing, statistical analysis, and expert system techniques used together; MASAND, B., G. LINOFF u. D. WALTZ: Classifying news stories using memory based reasoning; KEEN, E.M.: Term position ranking: some new test results; CROUCH, C.J. u. B. YANG: Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction; GREFENSTETTE, G.: Use of syntactic context to produce term association lists for text retrieval; ANICK, P.G. u. R.A. FLYNN: Versioning of full-text information retrieval system; BURKOWSKI, F.J.: Retrieval activities in a database consisting of heterogeneous collections; DEERWESTER, S.C., K. WACLENA u. M. LaMAR: A textual object management system; NIE, J.-Y.:Towards a probabilistic modal logic for semantic-based information retrieval; WANG, A.W., S.K.M. WONG u. Y.Y. YAO: An analysis of vector space models based on computational geometry; BARTELL, B.T., G.W. COTTRELL u. R.K. BELEW: Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling; GLAVITSCH, U. u. P. SCHÄUBLE: A system for retrieving speech documents; MARGULIS, E.L.: N-Poisson document modelling; HESS, M.: An incrementally extensible document retrieval system based on linguistics and logical principles; COOPER, W.S., F.C. GEY u. D.P. DABNEY: Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression; FUHR, N.: Integration of probabilistic fact and text retrieval; CROFT, B., L.A. SMITH u. H. TURTLE: A loosely-coupled integration of a text retrieval system and an object-oriented database system; DUMAIS, S.T. u. J. NIELSEN: Automating the assignement of submitted manuscripts to reviewers; GOST, M.A. u. M. MASOTTI: Design of an OPAC database to permit different subject searching accesses; ROBERTSON, A.M. u. P. WILLETT: Searching for historical word forms in a database of 17th century English text using spelling correction methods; FAX, E.A., Q.F. CHEN u. L.S. HEATH: A faster algorithm for constructing minimal perfect hash functions; MOFFAT, A. u. J. ZOBEL: Parameterised compression for sparse bitmaps; GRANDI, F., P. TIBERIO u. P. Zezula: Frame-sliced patitioned parallel signature files; ALLEN, B.: Cognitive differences in end user searching of a CD-ROM index; SONNENWALD, D.H.: Developing a theory to guide the process of designing information retrieval systems; CUTTING, D.R., J.O. PEDERSEN, D. KARGER, u. J.W. TUKEY: Scatter/ Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections; CHALMERS, M. u. P. CHITSON: Bead: Explorations in information visualization; WILLIAMSON, C. u. B. SHNEIDERMAN: The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploring system
