Search (1241 results, page 1 of 63)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004) 0.21
    0.20650584 = product of:
      0.24780701 = sum of:
        0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09979041 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.00826967 = weight(_text_:in in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00826967 = score(doc=3090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09140319 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033885043 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.014458697 = product of:
          0.028917395 = sum of:
            0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028917395 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft über Webometrics
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.05
    0.04770852 = product of:
      0.09541704 = sum of:
        0.00826967 = weight(_text_:in in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00826967 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=402,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.01937728 = product of:
          0.03875456 = sum of:
            0.03875456 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03875456 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  3. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: Blackbox SSCI : Datenerfassung und Datenverarbeitung bei der kommerziellen Indexierung von Zitaten (2019) 0.04
    0.040500827 = product of:
      0.121502474 = sum of:
        0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0137827825 = score(doc=5779,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
        0.10771969 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10771969 = score(doc=5779,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.42014992 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Zahlreiche Autoren, Autorinnen und kritische Initiativen (z. B. DORA) kritisieren den zu hohen und schädlichen Einfluss quantitativer Daten, welche akademische Instanzen für Evaluationszwecke heranziehen. Wegen des großen Einflusses der globalen Zitatdatenbanken von Thomson Reuters (bzw. Clarivate Analytics) auf die Bewertung der wissenschaftlichen Leistungen von Forscherinnen und Forschern habe ich extensive qualitative und quantitative Fallstudien zur Datenqualität des Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) durchgeführt, d. h. die Originaleinträge mit den SSCI-Datensätzen verglichen. Diese Fallstudien zeigten schwerste - nie in der Literatur erwähnte - Fehler, Verstümmelungen, Phantomautoren, Phantomwerke (Fehlerrate in der Fallstudie zu Beebe 2010, Harvard Law Review: 99 Prozent). Über die verwendeten Datenerfassungs- und Indexierungsverfahren von TR bzw. Clarivate Analytics ist nur wenig bekannt. Ein Ergebnis meiner Untersuchungen: Bei der Indexierung von Verweisen in Fußnoten (wie in den Rechtswissenschaften, gerade auch der USA, vorgeschrieben) scheinen die verwendeten Textanalyse-Anwendungen und -Algorithmen völlig überfordert. Eine Qualitätskontrolle scheint nicht stattzufinden. Damit steht der Anspruch des SSCI als einer multidisziplinären Datenbank zur Debatte. Korrekte Zitate in den Fußnoten des Originals können zu Phantom-Autoren, Phantom-Werken und Phantom-Referenzen degenerieren. Das bedeutet: Sämtliche Zeitschriften und Disziplinen, deren Zeitschriften und Büchern dieses oder ähnliche Zitierverfahren verwenden (Oxford-Style), laufen Gefahr, aufgrund starker Zitatverluste falsch, d. h. unterbewertet, zu werden. Wie viele UBOs (Unidentifiable Bibliographic Objects) sich in den Datenbanken SCI, SSCI und AHCI befinden, wäre nur mit sehr aufwändigen Prozeduren zu klären. Unabhängig davon handelt es sich, wie bei fast allen in meinen Untersuchungen gefundenen fatalen Fehlern, eindeutig um endogene Fehler in den Datenbanken, die nicht, wie oft behauptet, angeblich falsch zitierenden Autorinnen und Autoren zugeschrieben werden können, sondern erst im Laufe der Dateneingabe und -verarbeitung entstehen.
  4. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.04
    0.039406575 = product of:
      0.07881315 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045180056 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.025836375 = product of:
          0.05167275 = sum of:
            0.05167275 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05167275 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  5. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.04
    0.039406575 = product of:
      0.07881315 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045180056 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.025836375 = product of:
          0.05167275 = sum of:
            0.05167275 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05167275 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. C.R. Sugimoto
    Footnote
    Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
  6. Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften : Beiträge zur Umsetzung neuer Informationstechnologien (1994) 0.03
    0.03195953 = product of:
      0.06391906 = sum of:
        0.01193624 = weight(_text_:in in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01193624 = score(doc=5067,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.039933905 = weight(_text_:u in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039933905 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.25581595 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
        0.012048915 = product of:
          0.02409783 = sum of:
            0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02409783 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Beiträge behandeln aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln einen durch die Begriffe Sozialwissenschaft-Informatik-Information abgegrenzten, interdisziplinären Themenkomplex. Gerade in den Sozialwissenschaften haben die qualitative Textinterpretation und die Suche nach typischen, einzelnen Fällen ihren festen Stellenwert, und automatische Informationssuche und Informationsaufbereitung sind zu unverzichtbaren Forschungsinstrumenten geworden. Dieser Band enthält eine Vielzahl von Fachbeiträgen, die im Rahmen entsprechender Spezialveranstaltungen entstanden sind oder eigens für diesen Band geschrieben wurden. Sowohl als Einführungen wie auch im Rahmen spezieller Fragestellungen werden Ansätze aus den Gebieten Künstliche Intelligenz, Bilderkennung, Kommunikationsnetze, Hypertext, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie u.a., jeweils mit Bezug auf sozialwissenschaftliche Anwendung, vorgestellt
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: INGWERSEN, P.: Information science as a cognitive science; MEDER, N.: Objekt-orientierte Wissensdarstellung und -navigation; SPIESS, M.: Repräsentation unsicheren Wissens; HENRICHS, N.: Begriffswandel in Datenbanken: kontextuelle Inhaltsanalyse für Disambiguierung und ideengeschichtliche Analyse; VOGT, C. u. R. WILLE: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten; RITTBERGER, M.: Online-Retrieval und Hypertext: auf dem Weg zu verknüpften Datenbanken und offenen Hypertextsystemen; SCHOPEN, M.: GRIPS-Menu: Unterstützung von Endnutzerrecherchen in Literaturdatenbanken des DIMDI; KLOSE, G. u. T. PIRLEIN: Wissensmodellierung in LILOG; DANIEL, H.-D.: Peer-review als Qualitätsfilter im wissenschaftlichen Publikationswesen
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.167-168 (J. Krause)
  7. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.03
    0.03169528 = product of:
      0.06339056 = sum of:
        0.010128236 = weight(_text_:in in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010128236 = score(doc=2758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033885043 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.01937728 = product of:
          0.03875456 = sum of:
            0.03875456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03875456 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047673445 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
  8. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03
    0.031216865 = product of:
      0.093650594 = sum of:
        0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0137827825 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.07986781 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07986781 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
  9. Schwens, U.: Feasibility of exploiting bibliometric data in European national bibliographic databases (1999) 0.03
    0.03090312 = product of:
      0.092709355 = sum of:
        0.0136442585 = weight(_text_:in in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0136442585 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
        0.0790651 = weight(_text_:u in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0790651 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  10. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.03
    0.02648839 = product of:
      0.079465166 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  11. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1995) 0.03
    0.02648839 = product of:
      0.079465166 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Editor
    Koenig, M.E.D. u. A. Bookstein
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science research 18(1996) no.1, S.90-92 (E. Davenport)
  12. Herb, U.: Auch Pierre Bourdieu ist ein Indexierungsopfer (2017) 0.03
    0.02648839 = product of:
      0.079465166 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Interview mit Terje Tüür-Fröhlich über Fallstricke und Fehler informetrischer Analysen, Fehlern in Zitationsdatenbanken.
  13. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.03
    0.025313875 = product of:
      0.07594162 = sum of:
        0.00826967 = weight(_text_:in in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00826967 = score(doc=2742,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.067671955 = sum of:
          0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028917395 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047673445 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.03875456 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03875456 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047673445 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this research, we aim to identify factors that significantly affect the clickthrough of Web searchers. Our underlying goal is determine more efficient methods to optimize the clickthrough rate. We devise a clickthrough metric for measuring customer satisfaction of search engine results using the number of links visited, number of queries a user submits, and rank of clicked links. We use a neural network to detect the significant influence of searching characteristics on future user clickthrough. Our results show that high occurrences of query reformulation, lengthy searching duration, longer query length, and the higher ranking of prior clicked links correlate positively with future clickthrough. We provide recommendations for leveraging these findings for improving the performance of search engine retrieval and result ranking, along with implications for search engine marketing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  14. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.02
    0.02389699 = product of:
      0.07169097 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
        0.06389425 = weight(_text_:u in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06389425 = score(doc=5624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
  15. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.02
    0.02389699 = product of:
      0.07169097 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.06389425 = weight(_text_:u in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06389425 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt a) die Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie zur qualitativen Wahrnehmung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, b) die Konstruktion eines daraus abgeleiteten Kriterienkatalogs zur Wahrnehmung der Qualität wissenschaftlicher Publikationen sowie c) der Überprüfung dieses Katalogs in qualitativen Interviews mit Wissenschaflterinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus dem Fachspektrum Chemie, Physik, Biologie, Materialwissenschaft und Engineering. Es zeigte sich, dass die Wahrnehmung von Qualität auf äußerlichen und von außen herangetragenen Faktoren, inhaltlichen / semantischen Faktoren und sprachlichen, syntaktischen sowie strukturellen Faktoren beruht.
  16. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.02
    0.023749849 = product of:
      0.071249545 = sum of:
        0.010314091 = weight(_text_:in in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010314091 = score(doc=3081,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.060935456 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060935456 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.23767269 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
  17. Stock, W.: Informetrische Vermessung der Forschung und Entwicklung eines Landes : beispielhafte Resultate und Probleme (1992) 0.02
    0.022073656 = product of:
      0.06622097 = sum of:
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
        0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056475073 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  18. Haustein, S.; Tunger, D.: Sziento- und bibliometrische Verfahren (2013) 0.02
    0.022073656 = product of:
      0.06622097 = sum of:
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056475073 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  19. Haustein, S.: Scientific interactions and research evaluation : from bibliometrics to Altmetrics (2015) 0.02
    0.022073656 = product of:
      0.06622097 = sum of:
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=2981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
        0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056475073 = score(doc=2981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  20. Lewandowski, D.; Haustein, S.: What does the German-language information science community cite? (2015) 0.02
    0.022073656 = product of:
      0.06622097 = sum of:
        0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097459 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
        0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056475073 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 1199
  • el 25
  • m 20
  • s 14
  • r 3
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…