-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.42
0.41895643 = product of:
0.5027477 = sum of:
0.19958082 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19958082 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.7450137 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011695079 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.18280637 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18280637 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.71301806 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067770086 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.040895373 = product of:
0.081790745 = sum of:
0.081790745 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081790745 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.34
0.3408123 = product of:
0.40897477 = sum of:
0.16631734 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16631734 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.6208447 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.0097459 = weight(_text_:in in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097459 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.15233864 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15233864 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.5941817 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.056475073 = weight(_text_:u in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056475073 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.02409783 = product of:
0.04819566 = sum of:
0.04819566 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04819566 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996)
0.29
0.2914063 = product of:
0.34968758 = sum of:
0.13305387 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13305387 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.4966758 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.011026227 = weight(_text_:in in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011026227 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.12187091 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12187091 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045180056 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.038556527 = product of:
0.077113055 = sum of:
0.077113055 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077113055 = score(doc=5625,freq=8.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996)
0.25
0.2545442 = product of:
0.30545306 = sum of:
0.11642214 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11642214 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.0136442585 = weight(_text_:in in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0136442585 = score(doc=3132,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.106637046 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106637046 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.03953255 = weight(_text_:u in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03953255 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.029217066 = product of:
0.058434132 = sum of:
0.058434132 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058434132 = score(doc=3132,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Libraries and Information Highways MITRE Sponsored Research project aims to help searchers working in digital libraries increase their chance of matching the language of authors. Focuses on whether query formulation can be improved through the addition of semantic knowledge that is interactively gathered from a thesaurus that exists in a distributed, interoperating, cooperative environment. A prototype, ELVIS, was built that improves information retrieval through query expansion and is based on publicly available Z39.50 standard thesauri integrated with networked information discovery and retrieval tools
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999)
0.22
0.22037111 = product of:
0.26444533 = sum of:
0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09979041 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.014323489 = weight(_text_:in in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014323489 = score(doc=5362,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.0250432 = product of:
0.0500864 = sum of:
0.0500864 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0500864 = score(doc=5362,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast how facet analysis is used to construct the systematic or faceted displays of a selection of information retrieval thesauri. More specifically, the study seeks to examine which principles of facet analysis are used in the thesauri, and the extent to which different thesauri apply these principles in the same way. A measuring instrument was designed for the purpose of evaluating the structure of faceted thesauri. This instrument was applied to fourteen faceted information retrieval thesauri. The study reveals that the thesauri do not share a common definition of what constitutes a facet. In some cases, the thesauri apply both enumerative-style classification and facet analysis to arrange their indexing terms. A number of the facets used in the thesauri are not homogeneous or mutually exclusive. The principle of synthesis is used in only 50% of the thesauri, and no one citation order is used consistently by the thesauri.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-assisted search term selection and query expansion : a review of user-centred studies (2002)
0.21
0.21435116 = product of:
0.2572214 = sum of:
0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09979041 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011695079 = score(doc=1330,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.020447686 = product of:
0.040895373 = sum of:
0.040895373 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040895373 = score(doc=1330,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a review of the literature related to the application of domain-specific thesauri in the search and retrieval process. Focusing an studies that adopt a user-centred approach, the review presents a survey of the methodologies and results from empirical studies undertaken an the use of thesauri as sources of term selection for query formulation and expansion during the search process. It summarises the ways in which domain-specific thesauri from different disciplines have been used by various types of users and how these tools aid users in the selection of search terms. The review consists of two main sections: first, studies an thesaurus-aided search term selection; and second, studies dealing with query expansion using thesauri. Both sections are illustrated with case studies that have adopted a user-centred approach.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998)
0.21
0.21250707 = product of:
0.2550085 = sum of:
0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09979041 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.015471136 = weight(_text_:in in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015471136 = score(doc=5202,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.014458697 = product of:
0.028917395 = sum of:
0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028917395 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004)
0.21
0.21051069 = product of:
0.25261283 = sum of:
0.09979041 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09979041 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.013075498 = weight(_text_:in in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013075498 = score(doc=2658,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.09140319 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09140319 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.033885043 = weight(_text_:u in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033885043 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.014458697 = product of:
0.028917395 = sum of:
0.028917395 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028917395 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.19
0.1902421 = product of:
0.22829051 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0137827825 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.026942192 = product of:
0.053884383 = sum of:
0.053884383 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053884383 = score(doc=1520,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.: Topic familiarity and its effects on term selection and browsing in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment (2005)
0.18
0.1795846 = product of:
0.21550152 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.010896247 = weight(_text_:in in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010896247 = score(doc=613,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.017039739 = product of:
0.034079477 = sum of:
0.034079477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034079477 = score(doc=613,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To evaluate the extent to which familiarity with search topics affects the ways in which users select and browse search terms in a thesaurus-enhanced search setting. Design/methodology/approach - An experimental methodology was adopted to study users' search behaviour in an operational information retrieval environment. Findings - Topic familiarity and subject knowledge influence some search and interaction behaviours. Searches involving moderately and very familiar topics were associated with browsing around twice as many thesaurus terms as was the case for unfamiliar topics. Research limitations/implications - Some search behaviours such as thesaurus browsing and term selection could be used as an indication of user levels of topic familiarity. Practical implications - The results of this study provide design implications as to how to develop personalized search interfaces where users with varying levels of familiarity with search topics can carry out searches. Originality/value - This paper establishes the importance of topic familiarity characteristics and the effects of those characteristics on users' interaction with search interfaces enhanced with semantic tools such as thesauri.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: EXPO-INFO 2000 : Visuelles Besucherinformationssystem für Weltausstellungen (2000)
0.18
0.17852774 = product of:
0.2142333 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.014618848 = weight(_text_:in in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014618848 = score(doc=1404,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.012048915 = product of:
0.02409783 = sum of:
0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02409783 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- Das aktuelle Wissen der Welt im Spiegel einer Weltausstellung: Wie stellt man das dar und wie macht man es Interessierten zugänglich - in der Ausstellung, in Publikationen, im Funk und über das Internet? Was man alles auf einer Weltausstellung an der Schwelle zum dritten Jahrtausend sehen und erfahren kann, sprengt in Fülle und Vielfalt jeden individuell faßbaren Rahmen. Schmitz-Esser zeigt in seinem Buch, wie der Besucher wahlweise in vier Sprachen die Weltausstellung erleben und die Quintessenz davon mitnehmen kann. Ermöglicht wird dies durch das Konzept des virtuellen "Wissens in der Kapsel", das so aufbereitet ist, daß es in allen gängigen medialen Formen und für unterschiedlichste Wege der Aneignung eingesetzt werden kann. Die Lösung ist nicht nur eine Sache der Informatik und Informationstechnologie, sondern vielmehr auch eine Herausforderung an Informationswissenschaft und Computerlinguistik. Das Buch stellt Ziel, Ansatz, Komponenten und Voraussetzungen dafür dar.
- Content
- Willkommene Anregung schon am Eingang.- Vertiefung des Wissens während der Ausstellung.- Alles für das Wohlbefinden.- Die Systemstruktur und ihre einzelnen Elemente.- Wovon alles ausgeht.- Den Stoff als Topics und Subtopics strukturieren.- Die Nutshells.- Der Proxy-Text.Der Thesaurus.- Gedankenraumreisen.- Und zurück in die reale Welt.- Weitergehende Produkte.- Das EXPO-Infosystem auf einen Blick.- Register.- Literaturverzeichnis.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Sihvonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus (2004)
0.18
0.17783102 = product of:
0.21339723 = sum of:
0.08315867 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08315867 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.0137827825 = weight(_text_:in in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0137827825 = score(doc=4417,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.07616932 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07616932 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.028237537 = weight(_text_:u in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028237537 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.012048915 = product of:
0.02409783 = sum of:
0.02409783 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02409783 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- This study explores how experts and novices in pedagogics expanded queries supported by the ERIC thesaurus, and how this was connected to the search effectiveness in an easy and a difficult search task. The expert group consisted of 15 undergraduates in pedagogy and the novice group of 15 students with no previous studies in this field. Their search logs were recorded and a pre- and post-search interview was conducted. The results show that the number and type of terms selected from the thesaurus for expansion by experts improved search effectiveness, whereas there were no connections between the use of thesaurus and improvement of effectiveness among novices. The effectiveness of expansions varied between the facets of the queries. Thus, a vital condition for benefiting from a thesaurus in query expansion to improve search results is sufficient familiarity with the search topic. The results suggest also that it is not in the first place the number of terms used in expansion, but their type and quality that are crucial for search success.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Zimmermann, H.H.: Automatische Indexierung und elektronische Thesauri (1996)
0.13
0.13203171 = product of:
0.26406342 = sum of:
0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007796719 = score(doc=2062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
0.21108663 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21108663 = score(doc=2062,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.8233224 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 2062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045180056 = score(doc=2062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2062)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Überblick über die Möglichkeiten des Einsatzes automatischer Indexierung für die Erschließung von Textdokumenten mit einer Kurzvorstellung der Verfahren PASSAT, CTX und IDX sowie einer Skizze des Nutzens der Einbindung von Thesauri in den Prozess der automatischen Indexierung.
- Source
- Zukunft der Sacherschließung im OPAC: Vorträge des 2. Düsseldorfer OPAC-Kolloquiums am 21. Juni 1995. Hrsg.: E. Niggemann u. K. Lepsky
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.13
0.12919995 = product of:
0.15503995 = sum of:
0.05821107 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05821107 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21729566 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.011816275 = weight(_text_:in in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011816275 = score(doc=1800,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.053318523 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053318523 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2079636 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.019766275 = weight(_text_:u in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019766275 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.12662244 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.011927816 = product of:
0.023855632 = sum of:
0.023855632 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023855632 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8333333 = coord(5/6)
- Abstract
- The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Wersig, G.: Thesaurus Leitfaden : eine Einführung in das Thesaurus-Prinzip in Theorie und Praxis (1985)
0.09
0.09027764 = product of:
0.18055528 = sum of:
0.013504315 = weight(_text_:in in 2068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013504315 = score(doc=2068,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2068, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2068)
0.12187091 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12187091 = score(doc=2068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 2068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2068)
0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 2068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045180056 = score(doc=2068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2068)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Umfassendste deutsche Darstellung zum Thema 'Thesaurus' mit detaillierten Ausführungen zu den Grundsätzen der Erstellung eines Thesaurus und seiner Anwendung für die gleichordnende Indexierung. Enthält viele Beispiele.
- Content
- Nicht in allen Passagen leicht verständlich; Aktualisierung zur ersten Auflage leider nur durch einen unverbundenen Anhang.
- Theme
- Grundlagen u. Einführungen: Allgemeine Literatur
-
Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012)
0.08
0.07724423 = product of:
0.15448846 = sum of:
0.0058475393 = weight(_text_:in in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058475393 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.12926364 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12926364 = score(doc=3197,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25638393 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.50417995 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.01937728 = product of:
0.03875456 = sum of:
0.03875456 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03875456 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 14:03:22
- RSWK
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung>
- Subject
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung>
-
Krumholz, W.: Use and mis-use of thesauri : Bericht über eine Konferenz (1986)
0.07
0.07255345 = product of:
0.1451069 = sum of:
0.11642214 = weight(_text_:umfeld in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11642214 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26788878 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.011816275 = weight(_text_:in in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011816275 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.016868481 = product of:
0.033736963 = sum of:
0.033736963 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033736963 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Bericht über die Ergebnisse einer von der Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften in Brüssel vom 11.12.3.86 organisierten Konferenz. Als Ausgangspunkte dienten Folgerungen aus einer umfassenden Analyse von fast 1.000 Thesauri, dahingehemd, daß 'too many thesauri hampered by inadequate design, inappropriate exploitation, sometimes even non-use, insufficient maintenance, and inadequate development and updating software'. Die Ziele der Konferenz waren: (1) Set up an inventory of problems encountered in compiling, using, and managing a thesaurus; (2) Measure the impact of these problems on the effectiveness of information retrieval; (3) Make recommendations in order to solve these problems or avoid their occurrence
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens u.a
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.07
0.06686895 = product of:
0.1337379 = sum of:
0.015254747 = weight(_text_:in in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015254747 = score(doc=1149,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.03953255 = weight(_text_:u in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03953255 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.078950614 = sum of:
0.033736963 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033736963 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.045213655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045213655 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Source
- Relationships in the organization of knowledge. Eds.: Bean, C.A. u. R. Green
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.07
0.06606371 = product of:
0.13212742 = sum of:
0.0136442585 = weight(_text_:in in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0136442585 = score(doc=4792,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.03953255 = weight(_text_:u in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03953255 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.078950614 = sum of:
0.033736963 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033736963 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.045213655 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045213655 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16694428 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Joyce, T.; Needham, R.M.: ¬The thesaurus approach to information retrieval (1958)
0.06
0.0626024 = product of:
0.1252048 = sum of:
0.01653934 = weight(_text_:in in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01653934 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067770086 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.040895373 = product of:
0.081790745 = sum of:
0.081790745 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081790745 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14420812 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047673445 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgang Kaufmann 1997. S.15-20.
