Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fiander, D. J."
  • × theme_ss:"Auszeichnungssprachen"
  1. Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001) 0.05
    0.05049397 = product of:
      0.10098794 = sum of:
        0.10098794 = product of:
          0.20197588 = sum of:
            0.20197588 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20197588 = score(doc=5441,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.6778818 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.