-
Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012)
0.05
0.05432286 = product of:
0.10864572 = sum of:
0.10864572 = product of:
0.21729144 = sum of:
0.21729144 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21729144 = score(doc=4970,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.72928464 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011)
0.04
0.04207831 = product of:
0.08415662 = sum of:
0.08415662 = product of:
0.16831324 = sum of:
0.16831324 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16831324 = score(doc=4759,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5649015 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The presence of social networks in complex systems has made networks and community structure a focal point of study in many domains. Previous studies have focused on the structural emergence and growth of communities and on the topics displayed within the network. However, few scholars have closely examined the relationship between the thematic and structural properties of networks. Therefore, this article proposes the Tagger Tag Resource-Latent Dirichlet Allocation-Community model (TTR-LDA-Community model), which combines the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model with the Girvan-Newman community detection algorithm through an inference mechanism. Using social tagging data from Delicious, this article demonstrates the clustering of active taggers into communities, the topic distributions within communities, and the ranking of taggers, tags, and resources within these communities. The data analysis evaluates patterns in community structure and topical affiliations diachronically. The article evaluates the effectiveness of community detection and the inference mechanism embedded in the model and finds that the TTR-LDA-Community model outperforms other traditional models in tag prediction. This has implications for scholars in domains interested in community detection, profiling, and recommender systems.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Shen, X.; Li, D.; Shen, C.: Evaluating China's university library Web sites using correspondence analysis (2006)
0.01
0.013675196 = product of:
0.027350392 = sum of:
0.027350392 = product of:
0.054700784 = sum of:
0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054700784 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:40:18
-
Li, D.: Knowledge representation and discovery based on linguistic atoms (1998)
0.01
0.010256397 = product of:
0.020512793 = sum of:
0.020512793 = product of:
0.041025586 = sum of:
0.041025586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041025586 = score(doc=3836,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3836, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3836)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue of selected papers from the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD'97), held Singapore, 22-23 Feb 1997
