-
Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001)
0.05
0.05049397 = product of:
0.10098794 = sum of:
0.10098794 = product of:
0.20197588 = sum of:
0.20197588 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20197588 = score(doc=5441,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.6778818 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.
-
Miller, D.R.; Clarke, K.S.: Putting XML to work in the library : tools for improving access and management (2004)
0.03
0.029152704 = product of:
0.05830541 = sum of:
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11661082 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors, hoping to stimulate interest in XML (Extensible Markup Language) and explain its value to the library community, offer a fine introduction to the topic. The opening chapter defines XML as "a system for electronically tagging or marking up documents in order to label, organize, and categorize their content" and then goes on to describe its origins and fundamental building blocks. Subsequent chapters address related technologies, schema development, XML-based tools, and current and future library uses. The authors argue persuasively for increased XML use, emphasizing its advantages over HTML in flexibility, interoperability, extensibility, and internationalization. Information is detailed, deftly written, and supported by numerous examples. Readers without a technological bent may find the text daunting, but their perseverance will be richly rewarded. Particularly recommended for webmasters and those working in library information systems and technical services.
-
Clarke, K.S.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) (2009)
0.03
0.029152704 = product of:
0.05830541 = sum of:
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11661082 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- XML, the Extensible Markup Language is a syntax for tagging, or marking-up, textual information. It is a standard, established by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) that many use when sharing or working with structured information. XML isn't used by itself, but as a tool to create other data-specific markup languages. One benefit to using XML is that it enables these languages to distinguish the content that is being marked up from its presentation, allowing for greater flexibility and data reuse. The library community has embraced XML and uses it as the foundation for many of their own data-specific markup languages. Perhaps the greatest strength of XML is that it is very easy to start working with and yet, in conjunction with many other XML-related standards and technologies, can also be used to develop complex applications.
-
Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004)
0.01
0.011965796 = product of:
0.023931593 = sum of:
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047863185 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:39:22
-
Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000)
0.01
0.010256397 = product of:
0.020512793 = sum of:
0.020512793 = product of:
0.041025586 = sum of:
0.041025586 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041025586 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 1.2006 19:01:22
