Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Auszeichnungssprachen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Fiander, D. J.: Applying XML to the bibliographic description (2001) 0.05
    0.05049397 = product of:
      0.10098794 = sum of:
        0.10098794 = product of:
          0.20197588 = sum of:
            0.20197588 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20197588 = score(doc=5441,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.6778818 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past few years there has been a significant amount of work in the area of cataloging internet resources, primarily using new metadata standards like the Dublin Core, but there has been little work on applying new data description formats like SGML and XML to traditional cataloging practices. What little work has been done in the area of using SGML and XML for traditional bibliographic description has primarily been based on the concept of converting MARC tagging into XML tagging. I suggest that, rather than attempting to convert existing MARC tagging into a new syntax based on SGML or XML, a more fruitful possibility is to return to the cataloging standards and describe their inherent structure, learning from how MARC has been used successfully in modern OPAC while attempting to avoid MARC's rigid field-based restrictions.
  2. Clarke, K.S.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) (2009) 0.03
    0.029152704 = product of:
      0.05830541 = sum of:
        0.05830541 = product of:
          0.11661082 = sum of:
            0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11661082 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    XML, the Extensible Markup Language is a syntax for tagging, or marking-up, textual information. It is a standard, established by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) that many use when sharing or working with structured information. XML isn't used by itself, but as a tool to create other data-specific markup languages. One benefit to using XML is that it enables these languages to distinguish the content that is being marked up from its presentation, allowing for greater flexibility and data reuse. The library community has embraced XML and uses it as the foundation for many of their own data-specific markup languages. Perhaps the greatest strength of XML is that it is very easy to start working with and yet, in conjunction with many other XML-related standards and technologies, can also be used to develop complex applications.
  3. as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2003 11:06:22
  4. Schröder, A.: Web der Zukunft : RDF - Der erste Schritt zum semantischen Web 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden.
  5. Patrick, D.A.: XML in der Praxis : Unternehmensübergreifende Vorteile durch Enterprise Content Management (1999) 0.01
    0.011965796 = product of:
      0.023931593 = sum of:
        0.023931593 = product of:
          0.047863185 = sum of:
            0.047863185 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047863185 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2003 10:50:22
  6. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.01
    0.011965796 = product of:
      0.023931593 = sum of:
        0.023931593 = product of:
          0.047863185 = sum of:
            0.047863185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047863185 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
  7. Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000) 0.01
    0.010256397 = product of:
      0.020512793 = sum of:
        0.020512793 = product of:
          0.041025586 = sum of:
            0.041025586 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041025586 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:01:22