-
Heckner, M.: Tagging, rating, posting : studying forms of user contribution for web-based information management and information retrieval (2009)
0.06
0.05950771 = product of:
0.11901542 = sum of:
0.11901542 = product of:
0.23803084 = sum of:
0.23803084 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23803084 = score(doc=2931,freq=12.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.79889125 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Entstehung von Social Software ermöglicht es Nutzern, in großem Umfang im Netz zu publizieren. Bisher liegen aber nur wenige empirische Befunde zu funktionalen Eigenschaften sowie Qualitätsaspekten von Nutzerbeiträgen im Kontext von Informationsmanagement und Information Retrieval vor. Diese Arbeit diskutiert grundlegende Partizipationsformen, präsentiert empirische Studien über Social Tagging, Blogbeiträge sowie Relevanzbeurteilungen und entwickelt Design und Implementierung einer "sozialen" Informationsarchitektur für ein partizipatives Onlinehilfesystem.
- Content
- The Web of User Contribution - Foundations and Principles of the Social Web - Social Tagging - Rating and Filtering of Digital Resources Empirical Analysisof User Contributions - The Functional and Linguistic Structure of Tags - A Comparative Analysis of Tags for Different Digital Resource Types - Exploring Relevance Assessments in Social IR Systems - Exploring User Contribution Within a Higher Education Scenario - Summary of Empirical Results and Implications for Designing Social Information Systems User Contribution for a Participative Information System - Social Information Architecture for an Online Help System
- RSWK
- Social Tagging / Filter / Web log / World Wide Web 2.0
- Subject
- Social Tagging / Filter / Web log / World Wide Web 2.0
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Lipford, H.; Bello-Ogunu, E.: Facebook apps and tagging : the trade-off between personal privacy and engaging with friends (2015)
0.06
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = product of:
0.23322164 = sum of:
0.23322164 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23322164 = score(doc=2165,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.78275037 = fieldWeight in 2165, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The use of social network sites offers many potential social benefits, but also raises privacy concerns and challenges for users. The trade-off users have to make between using sites such as Facebook to connect with their friends versus protecting their personal privacy is not well understood. Furthermore, very little behavioral research has focused on how personal privacy concerns are related to information disclosures made by one's friends. Our survey study of 116 Facebook users shows that engaging with friends through tagging activity and third-party application use is associated with higher levels of personal Facebook usage and a stronger emotional attachment to Facebook. However, users who have high levels of personal privacy concern and perceive a lack of effectiveness in Facebook's privacy policies tend to engage less frequently in tagging and app activities with friends, respectively. Our model and results explore illustrate the complexity of the trade-off between privacy concerns, engaging with friends through tagging and apps, and Facebook usage.
-
Dillon, M.; Handley, J.C.; Weibel, S.L.: ADAPT: Automated Document Architecture Processing and Tagging (2001)
0.05
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = product of:
0.19435138 = sum of:
0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19435138 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.652292 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Miller, Y.; Shoham, S.: ¬The effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging (2010)
0.05
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = product of:
0.19435138 = sum of:
0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19435138 = score(doc=3453,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.652292 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we describe the results of an experiment designed to understand the effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging. The participants in the experiment were asked to tag 12 preselected images of Jewish cultural heritage. The users were partitioned into three groups: the first group saw only the images with no additional information whatsoever, the second group saw the images plus a short, descriptive title, and the third group saw the images, the titles, and the URL of the page in which the image appeared. In the first stage of the experiment, each user tagged the images without seeing the tags provided by the other users. In the second stage, the users saw the tags assigned by others and were encouraged to interact. Results show that after the social interaction phase, the tag sets converged and the popular tags became even more popular. Although in all cases the total number of assigned tags increased after the social interaction phase, the number of distinct tags decreased in most cases. When viewing the image only, in some cases the users were not able to correctly identify what they saw in some of the pictures, but they overcame the initial difficulties after interaction. We conclude from this experiment that social interaction may lead to convergence in tagging and that the wisdom of the crowds helps overcome the difficulties due to the lack of information.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999)
0.03
0.033844385 = product of:
0.06768877 = sum of:
0.06768877 = product of:
0.13537754 = sum of:
0.13537754 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13537754 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 8.2001 12:22:47
- Source
- Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
-
Angus, E.; Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr (2008)
0.03
0.029152704 = product of:
0.05830541 = sum of:
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11661082 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to investigate general patterns of tag usage and determines the usefulness of the tags used within university image groups to the wider Flickr community. There has been a significant rise in the use of Web 2.0 social network web sites and online applications in recent years. One of the most popular is Flickr, an online image management application. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a webometric data collection, classification and informetric analysis. Findings - The results show that members of university image groups tend to tag in a manner that is of use to users of the system as a whole rather than merely for the tag creator. Originality/value - This paper gives a valuable insight into the tagging practices of image groups in Flickr.
-
Antin, J.; Earp, M.: With a little help from my friends : self-interested and prosocial behavior on MySpace Music (2010)
0.03
0.029152704 = product of:
0.05830541 = sum of:
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11661082 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019)
0.03
0.029152704 = product of:
0.05830541 = sum of:
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11661082 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
-
Wilson, D.N.: Citing electronic sites (1996)
0.03
0.027350392 = product of:
0.054700784 = sum of:
0.054700784 = product of:
0.10940157 = sum of:
0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10940157 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110
-
Notess, G.R.: ¬The internet (1997)
0.03
0.027350392 = product of:
0.054700784 = sum of:
0.054700784 = product of:
0.10940157 = sum of:
0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10940157 = score(doc=7783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7783)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
-
Ghilardi, F.J.M.: ¬The information center of the future : the professional's role (1994)
0.03
0.027350392 = product of:
0.054700784 = sum of:
0.054700784 = product of:
0.10940157 = sum of:
0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10940157 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2015 18:22:38
-
Jansen, B.J.: Searching for digital images on the web (2008)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=1730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 1730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the way in which end user searching on the web has become the primary method of locating digital images for many people. This paper seeks to investigate how users structure these image queries. Design/methodology/approach - This study investigates the structure and formation of image queries on the web by mapping a sample of web queries to three known query classification schemes for image searching (i.e. Enser and McGregor, Jörgensen, and Chen). Findings - The results indicate that the features and attributes of web image queries differ relative to image queries utilized on other information retrieval systems and by other user populations. This research points to the need for five additional attributes (i.e. collections, pornography, presentation, URL, and cost) in order to classify web image queries, which were not present in any of the three prior classification schemes. Research limitations/implications - Patterns in web searching for image content do emerge that inform the design of web-based multimedia systems, namely, that there is a high interest in locating image collections by web searchers. Objects and people images are the predominant interest for web searchers. Cost is a factor for web searching. This knowledge of the structure of web image queries has implications for the design of image information retrieval systems and repositories, especially in the area of automatic tagging of images with metadata. Originality/value - This is the first research that examines whether or not one can apply image query classifications schemes to web image queries.
-
Nov, O.; Naaman, M.; Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community : a multidimensional perspective (2010)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Huang, C.; Fu, T.; Chen, H.: Text-based video content classification for online video-sharing sites (2010)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=3452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Rowley, J.: Current awareness in an electronic age (1998)
0.02
0.024174558 = product of:
0.048349116 = sum of:
0.048349116 = product of:
0.09669823 = sum of:
0.09669823 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09669823 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 17:50:37
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279
-
Orenstein, R.M.: Fulltext sources online (1997)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 2677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=2677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Online 22(1998) no.1, S.93-94 (J. Alita)
-
Locke, C.: ¬The future Internet (1994)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 3332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=3332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3332)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Internet world. 5(1994) no.6, S.22-23
-
Tilman, H.N.: Internet tools of the profession : a guide for information professionals (1997)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=6620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Online 22(1998) no.2, S.92 (C.A. Murchie)
-
Gilster, P.: Digital literacy (1997)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Online and CD-ROM review 22(1998) no.5, S.350-351 (P. Bradley)
-
Lavoie, B.F.: Web characterization project analyzes net content (1999)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1999, no.242, Nov/Dez., S.22-23
