Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.11
    0.105090946 = product of:
      0.21018189 = sum of:
        0.21018189 = sum of:
          0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1554811 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046712 = queryNorm
              0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054700784 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05046712 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.09
    0.08745811 = product of:
      0.17491622 = sum of:
        0.17491622 = product of:
          0.34983245 = sum of:
            0.34983245 = weight(_text_:tagging in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.34983245 = score(doc=309,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                1.1741256 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  3. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.04
    0.038870275 = product of:
      0.07774055 = sum of:
        0.07774055 = product of:
          0.1554811 = sum of:
            0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1554811 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
  4. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.03
    0.029152704 = product of:
      0.05830541 = sum of:
        0.05830541 = product of:
          0.11661082 = sum of:
            0.11661082 = weight(_text_:tagging in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11661082 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  5. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.03
    0.027350392 = product of:
      0.054700784 = sum of:
        0.054700784 = product of:
          0.10940157 = sum of:
            0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940157 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  6. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.03
    0.027350392 = product of:
      0.054700784 = sum of:
        0.054700784 = product of:
          0.10940157 = sum of:
            0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940157 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
  7. Weaver, M.: Contextual metadata: faceted schemas in virtual library communities (2007) 0.02
    0.024293922 = product of:
      0.048587844 = sum of:
        0.048587844 = product of:
          0.09717569 = sum of:
            0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09717569 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.326146 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the information needs of one user group, public library fiction readers, in order to reveal a design of an online community at the local level. Examination of user-generated metadata can reveal new approaches to information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review into behaviors of virtual communities; surveying public library readers regarding search behavior characteristics - the survey included a sample "tagging" exercise to determine whether public library communities could create meaningful metadata for retrieval purposes. Findings - The use of relevance as an indicator of tag quality is flawed: in a survey, public library readers "tagged" the novel The Da Vinci Code. The resulting collection of tags provided a richer description of the book than did the social book-related web site www.librarything.com. Tag collections can be broken down into different categories, each reflecting a different "facet" of the novel: character, plot, subject/topic, setting, and genre. Faceted structure to tags enables users to choose the context of the tag to the novel. Research limitations/implications - This research is relevant in the world of social networking sites, online communities, or any other such system where users generate descriptive metadata. Examination of such metadata can reveal facets, which can guide the architect/librarian in the design of a versatile architecture. Originality/value - This research resulted in a manifold design for a public-library-based online community that allowed for the full expression of users' information needs. This research introduces a faceted structure to current approaches for user-generated metadata, adding versatility to search terms.
  8. Bates, J.; Rowley, J.: Social reproduction and exclusion in subject indexing : a comparison of public library OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy (2011) 0.02
    0.024293922 = product of:
      0.048587844 = sum of:
        0.048587844 = product of:
          0.09717569 = sum of:
            0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09717569 = score(doc=4541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.326146 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight limits to the dominant model of social inclusion under which UK public libraries operate, to analyse how and to what extent processes of socio-cultural exclusion emerge in the subject representation and discoverability of "non-dominant" resources in public library OPACs, and to consider folksonomy as a solution to any issues raised. Design/methodology/approach - The paper first develops a critique of the dominant model of "inclusion" within UK public libraries, drawing on feminist and critical theories of identity. It then considers how this critique overlaps with and offers fresh insights into major debates within subject indexing, and develops a theoretical rationale for considering the potential of folksonomy to intervene in more inclusive subject-indexing design. A user-based critical interpretive methodology which understands OPACs as texts open to multiple interpretations is developed, and a comparative reading of standard OPACs and LibraryThing folksonomy is undertaken to evaluate the discoverability and subject representation of LGBTQ and ethnic minority resources. Findings - LibraryThing folksonomy offers benefits over LCSH subject indexing in the discoverability and representation of LGBTQ resources. However, the folksonomy is dominated by US taggers, and this impacts on the tagging of ethnic minority resources. Folksonomy, like traditional indexing, is found to contain its own biases in worldview and subject representation. Originality/value - The importance of subject indexing in developing inclusive library services is highlighted and a new method for evaluating OPACs is developed.
  9. Hogan, S.A.: Educating users about catalogues and cataloguing : the impossible dream (1993) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26
  10. Walker, S.: ¬The Okapi online catalogue research projects (1989) 0.02
    0.017093996 = product of:
      0.03418799 = sum of:
        0.03418799 = product of:
          0.06837598 = sum of:
            0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06837598 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 11:22:08
  11. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  12. McLachlan, R.W.: Public libraries : shrinking dollars, increased demands; clerical staff and OCLC to the rescue (1991) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC micro. 7(1991) no.6, S.19-22
  13. Seruga, J.: Object-oriented modeling of a library information system (1997) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34
  14. Sandlian, P.: Rethinking the rules (1995) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25
  15. Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.1-20
  16. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  17. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  18. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  19. Goldberg, T.; Neagle, E.: Serials information in the OPAC : a model for shared responsibility (1996) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Serials review. 22(1996) no.4, S.55-63
  20. Sharma, A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval protocol (1998) 0.01
    0.013675196 = product of:
      0.027350392 = sum of:
        0.027350392 = product of:
          0.054700784 = sum of:
            0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054700784 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046712 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22

Years

Types

  • a 49
  • el 2
  • b 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…