-
Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012)
0.09
0.08745811 = product of:
0.17491622 = sum of:
0.17491622 = product of:
0.34983245 = sum of:
0.34983245 = weight(_text_:tagging in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34983245 = score(doc=309,freq=18.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
1.1741256 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Tennis, J.T.: Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (2006)
0.06
0.05830541 = product of:
0.11661082 = sum of:
0.11661082 = product of:
0.23322164 = sum of:
0.23322164 = weight(_text_:tagging in 570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23322164 = score(doc=570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.78275037 = fieldWeight in 570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.05
0.05343678 = product of:
0.10687356 = sum of:
0.10687356 = product of:
0.32062066 = sum of:
0.32062066 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32062066 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Chowdhury, A.; Mccabe, M.C.: Improving information retrieval systems using part of speech tagging (1993)
0.05
0.05049397 = product of:
0.10098794 = sum of:
0.10098794 = product of:
0.20197588 = sum of:
0.20197588 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20197588 = score(doc=1061,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.6778818 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The object of Information Retrieval is to retrieve all relevant documents for a user query and only those relevant documents. Much research has focused on achieving this objective with little regard for storage overhead or performance. In the paper we evaluate the use of Part of Speech Tagging to improve, the index storage overhead and general speed of the system with only a minimal reduction to precision recall measurements. We tagged 500Mbs of the Los Angeles Times 1990 and 1989 document collection provided by TREC for parts of speech. We then experimented to find the most relevant part of speech to index. We show that 90% of precision recall is achieved with 40% of the document collections terms. We also show that this is a improvement in overhead with only a 1% reduction in precision recall.
- Object
- POS-Tagging
-
Schmid, H.: Improvements in Part-of-Speech tagging with an application to German (1995)
0.04
0.038870275 = product of:
0.07774055 = sum of:
0.07774055 = product of:
0.1554811 = sum of:
0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1554811 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020)
0.04
0.038870275 = product of:
0.07774055 = sum of:
0.07774055 = product of:
0.1554811 = sum of:
0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1554811 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The UCLA Library reorganized its software developers into focused subteams with one, the Labs Team, dedicated to conducting experiments. In this article we describe our first attempt at conducting a software development experiment, in which we attempted to improve our digital library's search results with metadata from cloud-based image tagging services. We explore the findings and discuss the lessons learned from our first attempt at running an experiment.
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.03
0.029454816 = product of:
0.058909632 = sum of:
0.058909632 = product of:
0.117819265 = sum of:
0.117819265 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117819265 = score(doc=1188,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.39543104 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
A number of such utilities are presented here, together with an emergent new class of tools that caters more to the academic communities and that stores not only user-supplied tags, but also structured citation metadata terms wherever it is possible to glean this information from service providers. This provision of rich, structured metadata means that the user is provided with an accurate third-party identification of a document, which could be used to retrieve that document, but is also free to search on user-supplied terms so that documents of interest (or rather, references to documents) can be made discoverable and aggregated with other similar descriptions either recorded by the user or by other users. Matt Biddulph in an XML.com article last year, in which he reviews one of the better known social bookmarking tools, del.icio.us, declares that the "del.icio.us-space has three major axes: users, tags, and URLs". We fully support that assessment but choose to present this deconstruction in a reverse order. This paper thus first recaps a brief history of bookmarks, then discusses the current interest in tagging, moves on to look at certain social issues, and finally considers some of the feature sets offered by the new bookmarking tools. A general review of a number of common social bookmarking tools is presented in the annex. A companion paper describes a case study in more detail: the tool that Nature Publishing Group has made available to the scientific community as an experimental entrée into this field - Connotea; our reasons for endeavouring to provide such a utility; and experiences gained and lessons learned.
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Xiaoyue M.; Cahier, J.-P.: Iconic categorization with knowledge-based "icon systems" can improve collaborative KM (2011)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=4837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Icon system could represent an efficient solution for collective iconic categorization of knowledge by providing graphical interpretation. Their pictorial characters assist visualizing the structure of text to become more understandable beyond vocabulary obstacle. In this paper we are proposing a Knowledge Engineering (KM) based iconic representation approach. We assume that these systematic icons improve collective knowledge management. Meanwhile, text (constructed under our knowledge management model - Hypertopic) helps to reduce the diversity of graphical understanding belonging to different users. This "position paper" also prepares to demonstrate our hypothesis by an "iconic social tagging" experiment which is to be accomplished in 2011 with UTT students. We describe the "socio semantic web" information portal involved in this project, and a part of the icons already designed for this experiment in Sustainability field. We have reviewed existing theoretical works on icons from various origins, which can be used to lay the foundation of robust "icons systems".
-
Frické, M.: Logical division (2016)
0.02
0.024293922 = product of:
0.048587844 = sum of:
0.048587844 = product of:
0.09717569 = sum of:
0.09717569 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09717569 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.326146 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024174558 = product of:
0.048349116 = sum of:
0.048349116 = product of:
0.09669823 = sum of:
0.09669823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09669823 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.024174558 = product of:
0.048349116 = sum of:
0.048349116 = product of:
0.09669823 = sum of:
0.09669823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09669823 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.02
0.023931593 = product of:
0.047863185 = sum of:
0.047863185 = product of:
0.09572637 = sum of:
0.09572637 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09572637 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.02
0.020512793 = product of:
0.041025586 = sum of:
0.041025586 = product of:
0.08205117 = sum of:
0.08205117 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08205117 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020)
0.02
0.020512793 = product of:
0.041025586 = sum of:
0.041025586 = product of:
0.08205117 = sum of:
0.08205117 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08205117 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 14:08:22
-
Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005)
0.02
0.019435138 = product of:
0.038870275 = sum of:
0.038870275 = product of:
0.07774055 = sum of:
0.07774055 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07774055 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.2609168 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Wei, W.; Ram, S.: Utilizing sozial bookmarking tag space for Web content discovery : a social network analysis approach (2010)
0.02
0.019435138 = product of:
0.038870275 = sum of:
0.038870275 = product of:
0.07774055 = sum of:
0.07774055 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07774055 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.2609168 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Social tagging
-
Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015)
0.02
0.017093996 = product of:
0.03418799 = sum of:
0.03418799 = product of:
0.06837598 = sum of:
0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06837598 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 12:51:57
-
Wagner, E.: Über Impfstoffe zur digitalen Identität? (2020)
0.02
0.017093996 = product of:
0.03418799 = sum of:
0.03418799 = product of:
0.06837598 = sum of:
0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06837598 = score(doc=5846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5846)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 5.2020 17:22:40
-
Engel, B.: Corona-Gesundheitszertifikat als Exitstrategie (2020)
0.02
0.017093996 = product of:
0.03418799 = sum of:
0.03418799 = product of:
0.06837598 = sum of:
0.06837598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06837598 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05046712 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 5.2020 17:22:28
