Search (116 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.11 
    0.105090946 = product of:
  0.21018189 = sum of:
    0.21018189 = sum of:
      0.1554811 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1554811 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.5218336 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
      0.054700784 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054700784 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  2. Glickert, P.: Gradational classification : a topic-tagging scheme for computerized production of a scannable list (1982) 0.06 
    0.05830541 = product of:
  0.11661082 = sum of:
    0.11661082 = product of:
      0.23322164 = sum of:
        0.23322164 = weight(_text_:tagging in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23322164 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.78275037 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Barnett, J.B.: Technical report cataloging for OCLC (1988) 0.05 
    0.05497087 = product of:
  0.10994174 = sum of:
    0.10994174 = product of:
      0.21988349 = sum of:
        0.21988349 = weight(_text_:tagging in 396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21988349 = score(doc=396,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.7379842 = fieldWeight in 396, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Specific provisions for cataloging technical reports are included in OCLC's Book Format. Over 200 technical report records for publications in the marine sciences, input by 60 libraries, were retrieved from the OCLC database and studied to determine the extent of use of the technical report tagging fields and indicators. It was found that these tagging fields and indicators, provided to accommodate the bibliographic characteristics of technical reports, are infrequently used. Suggestions are made to improve the quality and increase the quantity of technical report records in the OCLC database.
  4. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.05 
    0.045977287 = product of:
  0.091954574 = sum of:
    0.091954574 = sum of:
      0.06802298 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06802298 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.2283022 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.023931593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023931593 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03 
    0.03418799 = product of:
  0.06837598 = sum of:
    0.06837598 = product of:
      0.13675196 = sum of:
        0.13675196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13675196 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  6. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.03 
    0.03418799 = product of:
  0.06837598 = sum of:
    0.06837598 = product of:
      0.13675196 = sum of:
        0.13675196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13675196 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  7. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.03 
    0.03418799 = product of:
  0.06837598 = sum of:
    0.06837598 = product of:
      0.13675196 = sum of:
        0.13675196 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13675196 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  8. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.03 
    0.033397987 = product of:
  0.066795975 = sum of:
    0.066795975 = product of:
      0.20038791 = sum of:
        0.20038791 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20038791 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  9. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.03 
    0.029009473 = product of:
  0.058018945 = sum of:
    0.058018945 = product of:
      0.11603789 = sum of:
        0.11603789 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11603789 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  10. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  11. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  12. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  13. Grundsätze der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (DK) und Regeln für ihre Revision und Veröffentlichung (1981) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 25(1981) Nr.4, S.15-22
  14. Hermes, H.J.: ¬Die DK: eine todkranke Klassifikation? (1983) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 27(1983) Nr.6, S.19-22
  15. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  16. Gehirn und Bewußtsein (1989) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:21:08
  17. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  18. Dorfmüller, K.: Klassifikationsprobleme bei Musikalien : Sachstandsbericht (1) AIBM-Subkommission für Klassifikation (1980) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=3076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Forum Musikbibliothek. 1980, H.4, S.18-22
  19. Bauer, G.: Wissensdarstellung für eine effektive Mensch-Rechner-Interaktion (1985) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Rechentechnik/Datenverarbeitung. 22(1985) H.2, S.33-35
  20. Piternick, A.B.: What's in a name? : use of names and titles in subject searching (1985) 0.03 
    0.027350392 = product of:
  0.054700784 = sum of:
    0.054700784 = product of:
      0.10940157 = sum of:
        0.10940157 = weight(_text_:22 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10940157 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Database. 8(1985) no.4, S.22-28

Authors

Languages

  • e 72
  • d 41
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 87
  • m 19
  • s 5
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications