Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.49 
    0.49244925 = product of:
  0.73867387 = sum of:
    0.32728916 = weight(_text_:verbaler in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32728916 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3164578 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329627 = queryNorm
        1.0342269 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
    0.4113847 = sum of:
      0.32160953 = weight(_text_:dokumentationssprachen in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.32160953 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31369996 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329627 = queryNorm
          1.0252138 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08977516 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329627 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
    Theme
    Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen
  2. Winograd, T.: Software für Sprachverarbeitung (1984) 0.23 
    0.23242569 = product of:
  0.34863853 = sum of:
    0.23377797 = weight(_text_:verbaler in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23377797 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3164578 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329627 = queryNorm
        0.7387335 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
    0.11486055 = product of:
      0.2297211 = sum of:
        0.2297211 = weight(_text_:dokumentationssprachen in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2297211 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31369996 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.7322956 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Theme
    Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen
  3. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.12 
    0.116212845 = product of:
  0.17431927 = sum of:
    0.116888985 = weight(_text_:verbaler in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.116888985 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3164578 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329627 = queryNorm
        0.36936674 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
    0.057430275 = product of:
      0.11486055 = sum of:
        0.11486055 = weight(_text_:dokumentationssprachen in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11486055 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31369996 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.3661478 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Theme
    Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.06 
    0.06293969 = product of:
  0.094409525 = sum of:
    0.07517199 = product of:
      0.22551598 = sum of:
        0.22551598 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22551598 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4012611 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.019237533 = product of:
      0.038475066 = sum of:
        0.038475066 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038475066 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Schmidt, R.: Maschinelle Text-Ton-Synchronisation in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft (2000) 0.04 
    0.038962997 = product of:
  0.116888985 = sum of:
    0.116888985 = weight(_text_:verbaler in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.116888985 = score(doc=5559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3164578 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329627 = queryNorm
        0.36936674 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Tonmaterial in Form von Audio- oder Videoaufnahmen spielt in Bereichen der Wissenschaft, die sich mit verbaler Interaktion beschäftigen, eine bedeutende Rolle. Solche Gebiete sind u,a. die Linguistik, Psychologie, Soziologie und Kriminalistik. Gegenstand der Untersuchung können dabei z.B. die Formen des sprachlichen Handelns und der Sprachvariation in Abhängigkeit von der Situation oder die Ausprägung und Entwicklung von Sprachunterschieden vor dem sozialen Hintergrund sein. Im Rahmen der Analyse eines Gesprächsverlaufs kann beispielsweise die Form der Rederechtsicherung von Interesse sein. In diesem Zusammenhang stellen sich Fragen wie z.B. "Wie bringen Gesprächsteilnehrner Gesprächsbeteiligte dazu, ihre Rede zu unterbrechen?" oder "Wie wehren Gesprächsteilnehmer Unterbrechungsversuche voll anderen Teilnehmern ab?". Denkbar ist hier u.a. nach dem Vorkommen von "ausreden lassen" zu suchen, wobei diese beiden Wörter nicht unbedingt nebeneinander auftreten müssen. Bei der Suche nach Stellen an denen ein Gesprächsteilnehmer Ansprüche oder Forderungen an einen Gesprächspartner stellt, können die flektierten Formen der Modalverben wie z.B. "müssen", "sollen" oder "dürfen" für die Anfrage wichtig sein, während Konnektiva wie "aber", "ja aber" oder "doch" auf oppositive Gesprächsabschnitte verweisen können. Näheres zur gesprächsanalytischen Methodik kann Deppermann (1999) und Brünner et al. (1999) entnommen werden. In dem Bereich der Linguistik, die den Gebrauch von gesprochener Sprache in offiziellen und privaten Situationen zum Gegenstand hat, sind u.a. auch Aussprachevarianten von großem Interesse. Von der Untersuchung der Sprachfärbungen erhofft man sich detaillierte Aussagen über die Sprechersituation und die regionale (König (1988)) und soziale Herkunft des Sprechers machen zu können. In der Kriminalistik wirken solche Ergebnisse unterstützend bei der Identifizierung von Personen
  6. Thiel, M.: Bedingt wahrscheinliche Syntaxbäume (2006) 0.03 
    0.031170398 = product of:
  0.093511194 = sum of:
    0.093511194 = weight(_text_:verbaler in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.093511194 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3164578 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329627 = queryNorm
        0.2954934 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.686252 = idf(docFreq=149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Tendenz ist eindeutig: wo immer es sinnvoll ist, werden hart' programmierte Lösungen durch Ansätze des Softcomputing ersetzt. Vor allem technische und kommerzielle Bereiche profitieren davon. So finden wir Kransteuerungen und viele andere Anwendungen mit Fuzzy Expertensystemen sowie Bilderkennungssysteme und Entscheidungen über die Kreditvergabe mit Neuronalen Netzen oder auch Methoden des Maschinellen Lernens (vgl. Jafar-Shaghaghi 1994). Ein Prinzip dieser Ansätze ist, dass die Software sich automatisch an die spezielle Situation und Datengrundlage der Anwendung anpasst. Flexibilität der Anpassung und die Fähigkeit zur Verallgemeinerung auf bislang ungesehene Fälle sind implizit in den Methoden vorhanden. Gerade dies ist auch ein typisches Problem, das bei der Beschreibung und vor allem beim Parsen natürlicher Sprache auftritt. Bei der Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache kommt das leidige Problem der Ambiguität auf verschiedenen Ebenen hinzu. Alternative Regeln schließen sich in ihrer Anwendung in einem Satz meistens gegenseitig aus und sind nicht alle an der aktuellen Stelle gleich wahrscheinlich. Auf diese Problematik wurde schon früh hingewiesen (Thiel 1987, 137 ff.), wo versucht wurde, mit Gewichtungen die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Regeln, Syntaxbäumen, Kategorien und Wortsemantik in den Griff zu bekommen. Das Gewicht eines Syntaxbaumes kann z.B. einfach zugewiesen werden oder berechnet werden als Funktion des Baumes, aus dem er abgeleitet wird, und der angewandten Regel. Ein solches Verfahren wird (Thiel 1987, 152) am Beispiel einer Heuristik für die Inferenzmaschine eines Expertensystems gezeigt. Aber auch bereits in einer sehr frühen Veröffentlichung zur Analyse natürlicher Sprache, an der Zimmermann maßgeblich beteiligt war, wurde auf Vorkommenswahrscheinlichkeiten hingewiesen: "Statistische Auswertung von Typen des Satzbaus, Bau nominaler und verbaler Gruppen ..." (Eggers et al. 1969, 18). Derzeit konzentrieren sich die Ansätze von Vagheit in der Verarbeitung von natürlicher Sprache vor allem auf die Filterung von Texten z.B. in Spam-Filtern und auf probabilistische kontextfreie Grammatiken.
  7. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.03 
    0.02505733 = product of:
  0.07517199 = sum of:
    0.07517199 = product of:
      0.22551598 = sum of:
        0.22551598 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22551598 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4012611 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  8. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02 
    0.01710003 = product of:
  0.05130009 = sum of:
    0.05130009 = product of:
      0.10260018 = sum of:
        0.10260018 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10260018 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  9. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.01 
    0.014962527 = product of:
  0.04488758 = sum of:
    0.04488758 = product of:
      0.08977516 = sum of:
        0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08977516 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  10. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.01 
    0.014962527 = product of:
  0.04488758 = sum of:
    0.04488758 = product of:
      0.08977516 = sum of:
        0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08977516 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  11. New tools for human translators (1997) 0.01 
    0.014962527 = product of:
  0.04488758 = sum of:
    0.04488758 = product of:
      0.08977516 = sum of:
        0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08977516 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  12. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.01 
    0.014962527 = product of:
  0.04488758 = sum of:
    0.04488758 = product of:
      0.08977516 = sum of:
        0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08977516 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  13. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01 
    0.014962527 = product of:
  0.04488758 = sum of:
    0.04488758 = product of:
      0.08977516 = sum of:
        0.08977516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08977516 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  14. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.012825022 = product of:
  0.038475066 = sum of:
    0.038475066 = product of:
      0.07695013 = sum of:
        0.07695013 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07695013 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  15. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.01 
    0.012825022 = product of:
  0.038475066 = sum of:
    0.038475066 = product of:
      0.07695013 = sum of:
        0.07695013 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07695013 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  16. Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000) 0.01 
    0.012825022 = product of:
  0.038475066 = sum of:
    0.038475066 = product of:
      0.07695013 = sum of:
        0.07695013 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07695013 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
  17. Hutchins, J.: From first conception to first demonstration : the nascent years of machine translation, 1947-1954. A chronology (1997) 0.01 
    0.010687519 = product of:
  0.032062557 = sum of:
    0.032062557 = product of:
      0.06412511 = sum of:
        0.06412511 = weight(_text_:22 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06412511 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  18. Kuhlmann, U.; Monnerjahn, P.: Sprache auf Knopfdruck : Sieben automatische Übersetzungsprogramme im Test (2000) 0.01 
    0.010687519 = product of:
  0.032062557 = sum of:
    0.032062557 = product of:
      0.06412511 = sum of:
        0.06412511 = weight(_text_:22 in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06412511 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.220-229
  19. Lezius, W.; Rapp, R.; Wettler, M.: ¬A morphology-system and part-of-speech tagger for German (1996) 0.01 
    0.010687519 = product of:
  0.032062557 = sum of:
    0.032062557 = product of:
      0.06412511 = sum of:
        0.06412511 = weight(_text_:22 in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06412511 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:37:18
  20. Wanner, L.: Lexical choice in text generation and machine translation (1996) 0.01 
    0.008550015 = product of:
  0.025650045 = sum of:
    0.025650045 = product of:
      0.05130009 = sum of:
        0.05130009 = weight(_text_:22 in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05130009 = score(doc=8521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1657403 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329627 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 37
  • d 19

Types

  • a 43
  • m 6
  • el 5
  • s 4
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications