Search (207 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.01 
    0.013753477 = product of:
  0.06876738 = sum of:
    0.06876738 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06876738 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17061387 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028060954 = queryNorm
        0.4030586 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Gourbin, G.: ¬Une nouvelle profession : cyber-documentaliste l'exemple de Nomade (1998) 0.01 
    0.009162416 = product of:
  0.022906039 = sum of:
    0.016252764 = product of:
      0.048758287 = sum of:
        0.048758287 = weight(_text_:f in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048758287 = score(doc=2980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.43594533 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.006653276 = product of:
      0.026613103 = sum of:
        0.026613103 = weight(_text_:22 in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026613103 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Language
    f
    Location
    F
  3. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.01 
    0.008913646 = product of:
  0.044568233 = sum of:
    0.044568233 = product of:
      0.13370469 = sum of:
        0.13370469 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13370469 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23790108 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  4. Fuld, L.M.: Will today's databases survive : a question of value (1996) 0.01 
    0.008486962 = product of:
  0.042434808 = sum of:
    0.042434808 = product of:
      0.12730442 = sum of:
        0.12730442 = weight(_text_:pr in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12730442 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20103675 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6332395 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the evolution of online databases during the 1990s considering the effect of cheap information accessed through the Internet. InfoSeek includes Associated Press Online, Reuters Business Report, Commerce Business Daily and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts for a basic 9.95 dollars per month. PR Newswire offers an automated faxback system of press releases at no charge to the caller. CD-ROM directories are making online access almost obsolete. With greater numbers of sophisticated electronic competitors, survival can only be achieved through high quality access, accuracy and added value
  5. Amato, G.; Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Multimedia document search on the Web (1998) 0.01 
    0.008295185 = product of:
  0.020737961 = sum of:
    0.013134217 = product of:
      0.03940265 = sum of:
        0.03940265 = weight(_text_:f in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03940265 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0076037436 = product of:
      0.030414974 = sum of:
        0.030414974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030414974 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  6. Becker, F.: Internet-Suchmaschinen : Funktionsweise und Beurteilung (1999) 0.01 
    0.008295185 = product of:
  0.020737961 = sum of:
    0.013134217 = product of:
      0.03940265 = sum of:
        0.03940265 = weight(_text_:f in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03940265 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0076037436 = product of:
      0.030414974 = sum of:
        0.030414974 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030414974 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:04:11
  7. Leighton, H.V.: Performance of four World Wide Web (WWW) index services : Infoseek, Lycos, WebCrawler and WWWWorm (1995) 0.01 
    0.005572376 = product of:
  0.027861878 = sum of:
    0.027861878 = product of:
      0.083585635 = sum of:
        0.083585635 = weight(_text_:f in 3168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083585635 = score(doc=3168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.74733484 = fieldWeight in 3168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.winona.msus.edu/services-f/library-f/webind.htm
  8. Speck, H.; Thiele, F.P.: Goggle, Gossip & PR-ostitution : Das Geschäft einer Suchmaschine (2005) 0.01 
    0.005304351 = product of:
  0.026521754 = sum of:
    0.026521754 = product of:
      0.07956526 = sum of:
        0.07956526 = weight(_text_:pr in 3508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07956526 = score(doc=3508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20103675 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3957747 = fieldWeight in 3508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3508)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  9. Seiffert, F.: Wie indexieren Google & Co 13 Millionen Seiten? (2004) 0.00 
    0.0045969756 = product of:
  0.022984877 = sum of:
    0.022984877 = product of:
      0.06895463 = sum of:
        0.06895463 = weight(_text_:f in 2390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06895463 = score(doc=2390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 2390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2390)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Patalong, F.: Life after Google : III. Suchen und finden kann man auch ganz anders (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045969756 = product of:
  0.022984877 = sum of:
    0.022984877 = product of:
      0.06895463 = sum of:
        0.06895463 = weight(_text_:f in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06895463 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Siering, F.: Barfuß zum Erfolg (1999) 0.00 
    0.003940265 = product of:
  0.019701324 = sum of:
    0.019701324 = product of:
      0.05910397 = sum of:
        0.05910397 = weight(_text_:f in 8504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05910397 = score(doc=8504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 8504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8504)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Freistetter, F.: Vollkommen logisch (2020) 0.00 
    0.003940265 = product of:
  0.019701324 = sum of:
    0.019701324 = product of:
      0.05910397 = sum of:
        0.05910397 = weight(_text_:f in 5658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05910397 = score(doc=5658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 5658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5658)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Eymard, G.; Francony, J.-M.: Vers un serveur d'indexation et de recherche sur le WEB (1999) 0.00 
    0.0032835545 = product of:
  0.016417772 = sum of:
    0.016417772 = product of:
      0.04925331 = sum of:
        0.04925331 = weight(_text_:f in 6271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04925331 = score(doc=6271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 6271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    f
  14. Puscher, F.: Suchmaschinen im Härtetest (2001) 0.00 
    0.0032835545 = product of:
  0.016417772 = sum of:
    0.016417772 = product of:
      0.04925331 = sum of:
        0.04925331 = weight(_text_:f in 6854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04925331 = score(doc=6854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 6854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6854)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.00 
    0.0032259957 = product of:
  0.016129978 = sum of:
    0.016129978 = product of:
      0.06451991 = sum of:
        0.06451991 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06451991 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  16. Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999) 0.00 
    0.0032259957 = product of:
  0.016129978 = sum of:
    0.016129978 = product of:
      0.06451991 = sum of:
        0.06451991 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06451991 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.1999 20:22:06
  17. Rensman, J.: Blick ins Getriebe (1999) 0.00 
    0.0032259957 = product of:
  0.016129978 = sum of:
    0.016129978 = product of:
      0.06451991 = sum of:
        0.06451991 = weight(_text_:22 in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06451991 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:22:59
  18. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.00 
    0.0030414974 = product of:
  0.015207487 = sum of:
    0.015207487 = product of:
      0.06082995 = sum of:
        0.06082995 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06082995 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  19. Suck, M.: Ranking-Betrug bei Google & Co. : Suchmaschinen (2003) 0.00 
    0.003000594 = product of:
  0.01500297 = sum of:
    0.01500297 = product of:
      0.04500891 = sum of:
        0.04500891 = weight(_text_:pr in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04500891 = score(doc=1337,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20103675 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.22388399 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Der Schönheitsfehler: Von dem vielen Geld hat der Suchmaschinen-Betreiber gar nichts, schlimmer noch: Das Renommee leidet. Kein Wunder, dass Google & Co. die Optimierer ein Dorn im Auge sind. Das amerikanische Mutterhaus des Branchenprimus sah sich deshalb bereits im April letzten Jahres veranlasst, zu rigorosen Maßnahmen zu greifen und sperrte kurzerhand die IP-Adressen des Breitbrand-Providers Comcast, auf dem viele SpamSeiten lagen. Damit wurden aber auch all jene Surfer ausgesperrt, die Comcast einfach nur als Zugangs-Provider nutzten. IP-Adressen will Google deshalb fortan nicht mehr sperren. Man arbeite aber, so Googles PR-Manager Nathan Taylor, mit einem Team von Ingenieuren daran, die Such-Spider gezielt auf die Erkennung von Spam-Seiten "abzurichten". Ein Problem sieht Taylor ohnehin nicht in den neuen Tricks der Werber, denn Google sei "viel widerstandsfähiger" gegen Manipulationsversuche als die Konkurrenz. Eine gewisse Nervosität scheint den Marktführer dennoch befallen zuhaben: Der deutsche Index von Google soll jetzt "deutlich verbessert werden", so Taylor. Ähnliche Absichtserklärungen gibt es auch von der Konkurrenz. So hat Altavista in den USA ebenfalls ein "Spam-Team" gegründet, das "schwarze Listen" von bekannten Übeltätern erstellen und die Link-Analysen verbessern soll. Andreas Hartmann, Product Manager bei Altavista, sieht das derzeit ganz sportlich als "Rennen zwischen Suchmaschinen und Optimierern" - Ausgang offen. In Deutschland setzt man derweil auf Konsens statt auf Konfrontation. Eine Projektgruppe des Deutschen Multimedia Verbandes (dmmv) soll "Richtlinien für seriöses Suchmaschinen-Marketing" erarbeiten. Dahinter steckt die Vermutung, dass auch die Optimierer an sinnvollen Suchergebnissen interessiert sind - die Vorschläge sind freilich nicht bindend. Christoph Huneke, Sprecher des dmmv, ist dennoch zuversichtlich, dass es eine Lösung gibt. Denn ansonsten, so Huneke, "surfen die Leute wieder im Videotext statt im Internet". Kein Wunder, dass Google & Co. die Optimierer ein Dorn im Auge sind. Das amerikanische Mutterhaus des Branchenprimus sah sich deshalb bereits im April letzten Jahres veranlasst, zu rigorosen Maßnahmen zu greifen und sperrte kurzerhand die IP-Adressen des Breitbrand-Providers Comcast, auf dem viele SpamSeiten lagen. Damit wurden aber auch all jene Surfer ausgesperrt, die Comcast einfach nur als Zugangs-Provider nutzten. IP-Adressen will Google deshalb fortan nicht mehr sperren. Man arbeite aber, so Googles PR-Manager Nathan Taylor, mit einem Team von Ingenieuren daran, die Such-Spider gezielt auf die Erkennung von Spam-Seiten "abzurichten". Ein Problem sieht Taylor ohnehin nicht in den neuen Tricks der Werber, denn Google sei "viel widerstandsfähiger" gegen Manipulationsversuche als die Konkurrenz. Eine gewisse Nervosität scheint den Marktführer dennoch befallen zuhaben: Der deutsche Index von Google soll jetzt "deutlich verbessert werden", so Taylor. Ähnliche Absichtserklärungen gibt es auch von der Konkurrenz. So hat Altavista in den USA ebenfalls ein "Spam-Team" gegründet, das "schwarze Listen" von bekannten Übeltätern erstellen und die Link-Analysen verbessern soll. Andreas Hartmann, Product Manager bei Altavista, sieht das derzeit ganz sportlich als "Rennen zwischen Suchmaschinen und Optimierern" - Ausgang offen. In Deutschland setzt man derweil auf Konsens statt auf Konfrontation. Eine Projektgruppe des Deutschen Multimedia Verbandes (dmmv) soll "Richtlinien für seriöses Suchmaschinen-Marketing" erarbeiten. Dahinter steckt die Vermutung, dass auch die Optimierer an sinnvollen Suchergebnissen interessiert sind - die Vorschläge sind freilich nicht bindend. Christoph Huneke, Sprecher des dmmv, ist dennoch zuversichtlich, dass es eine Lösung gibt. Denn ansonsten, so Huneke, "surfen die Leute wieder im Videotext statt im Internet".
  20. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026883294 = product of:
  0.0134416465 = sum of:
    0.0134416465 = product of:
      0.053766586 = sum of:
        0.053766586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053766586 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 113
  • e 89
  • f 4
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 183
  • el 19
  • m 8
  • p 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications