-
Harabagiu, S.; Hickl, A.; Lacatusu, F.: Satisfying information needs with multi-document summaries (2007)
0.00
0.0026268435 = product of:
0.013134217 = sum of:
0.013134217 = product of:
0.03940265 = sum of:
0.03940265 = weight(_text_:f in 939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03940265 = score(doc=939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=939)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Moens, M.-F.: Summarizing court decisions (2007)
0.00
0.0022984878 = product of:
0.011492439 = sum of:
0.011492439 = product of:
0.034477316 = sum of:
0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034477316 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Liang, S.-F.; Devlin, S.; Tait, J.: Investigating sentence weighting components for automatic summarisation (2007)
0.00
0.0019701326 = product of:
0.009850662 = sum of:
0.009850662 = product of:
0.029551985 = sum of:
0.029551985 = weight(_text_:f in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029551985 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Yeh, J.-Y.; Ke, H.-R.; Yang, W.-P.; Meng, I.-H.: Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis (2005)
0.00
0.0016417772 = product of:
0.008208886 = sum of:
0.008208886 = product of:
0.024626656 = sum of:
0.024626656 = weight(_text_:f in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024626656 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes two approaches to address text summarization: modified corpus-based approach (MCBA) and LSA-based T.R.M. approach (LSA + T.R.M.). The first is a trainable summarizer, which takes into account several features, including position, positive keyword, negative keyword, centrality, and the resemblance to the title, to generate summaries. Two new ideas are exploited: (1) sentence positions are ranked to emphasize the significances of different sentence positions, and (2) the score function is trained by the genetic algorithm (GA) to obtain a suitable combination of feature weights. The second uses latent semantic analysis (LSA) to derive the semantic matrix of a document or a corpus and uses semantic sentence representation to construct a semantic text relationship map. We evaluate LSA + T.R.M. both with single documents and at the corpus level to investigate the competence of LSA in text summarization. The two novel approaches were measured at several compression rates on a data corpus composed of 100 political articles. When the compression rate was 30%, an average f-measure of 49% for MCBA, 52% for MCBA + GA, 44% and 40% for LSA + T.R.M. in single-document and corpus level were achieved respectively.
-
Sweeney, S.; Crestani, F.; Losada, D.E.: 'Show me more' : incremental length summarisation using novelty detection (2008)
0.00
0.0016417772 = product of:
0.008208886 = sum of:
0.008208886 = product of:
0.024626656 = sum of:
0.024626656 = weight(_text_:f in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024626656 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Wei, F.; Li, W.; Lu, Q.; He, Y.: Applying two-level reinforcement ranking in query-oriented multidocument summarization (2009)
0.00
0.0016417772 = product of:
0.008208886 = sum of:
0.008208886 = product of:
0.024626656 = sum of:
0.024626656 = weight(_text_:f in 3120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024626656 = score(doc=3120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 3120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3120)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.00
0.0011405615 = product of:
0.0057028076 = sum of:
0.0057028076 = product of:
0.02281123 = sum of:
0.02281123 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02281123 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.00
9.5046795E-4 = product of:
0.00475234 = sum of:
0.00475234 = product of:
0.01900936 = sum of:
0.01900936 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01900936 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028060954 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
