Search (122 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Speck, H.; Thiele, F.P.: Goggle, Gossip & PR-ostitution : Das Geschäft einer Suchmaschine (2005) 0.01 
    0.005304351 = product of:
  0.026521754 = sum of:
    0.026521754 = product of:
      0.07956526 = sum of:
        0.07956526 = weight(_text_:pr in 3508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07956526 = score(doc=3508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20103675 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3957747 = fieldWeight in 3508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3508)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. Seiffert, F.: Wie indexieren Google & Co 13 Millionen Seiten? (2004) 0.00 
    0.0045969756 = product of:
  0.022984877 = sum of:
    0.022984877 = product of:
      0.06895463 = sum of:
        0.06895463 = weight(_text_:f in 2390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06895463 = score(doc=2390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 2390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2390)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Patalong, F.: Life after Google : III. Suchen und finden kann man auch ganz anders (2002) 0.00 
    0.0045969756 = product of:
  0.022984877 = sum of:
    0.022984877 = product of:
      0.06895463 = sum of:
        0.06895463 = weight(_text_:f in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06895463 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Puscher, F.: Suchmaschinen im Härtetest (2001) 0.00 
    0.0032835545 = product of:
  0.016417772 = sum of:
    0.016417772 = product of:
      0.04925331 = sum of:
        0.04925331 = weight(_text_:f in 6854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04925331 = score(doc=6854,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 6854, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6854)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.00 
    0.0030414974 = product of:
  0.015207487 = sum of:
    0.015207487 = product of:
      0.06082995 = sum of:
        0.06082995 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06082995 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  6. Suck, M.: Ranking-Betrug bei Google & Co. : Suchmaschinen (2003) 0.00 
    0.003000594 = product of:
  0.01500297 = sum of:
    0.01500297 = product of:
      0.04500891 = sum of:
        0.04500891 = weight(_text_:pr in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04500891 = score(doc=1337,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20103675 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.22388399 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Der Schönheitsfehler: Von dem vielen Geld hat der Suchmaschinen-Betreiber gar nichts, schlimmer noch: Das Renommee leidet. Kein Wunder, dass Google & Co. die Optimierer ein Dorn im Auge sind. Das amerikanische Mutterhaus des Branchenprimus sah sich deshalb bereits im April letzten Jahres veranlasst, zu rigorosen Maßnahmen zu greifen und sperrte kurzerhand die IP-Adressen des Breitbrand-Providers Comcast, auf dem viele SpamSeiten lagen. Damit wurden aber auch all jene Surfer ausgesperrt, die Comcast einfach nur als Zugangs-Provider nutzten. IP-Adressen will Google deshalb fortan nicht mehr sperren. Man arbeite aber, so Googles PR-Manager Nathan Taylor, mit einem Team von Ingenieuren daran, die Such-Spider gezielt auf die Erkennung von Spam-Seiten "abzurichten". Ein Problem sieht Taylor ohnehin nicht in den neuen Tricks der Werber, denn Google sei "viel widerstandsfähiger" gegen Manipulationsversuche als die Konkurrenz. Eine gewisse Nervosität scheint den Marktführer dennoch befallen zuhaben: Der deutsche Index von Google soll jetzt "deutlich verbessert werden", so Taylor. Ähnliche Absichtserklärungen gibt es auch von der Konkurrenz. So hat Altavista in den USA ebenfalls ein "Spam-Team" gegründet, das "schwarze Listen" von bekannten Übeltätern erstellen und die Link-Analysen verbessern soll. Andreas Hartmann, Product Manager bei Altavista, sieht das derzeit ganz sportlich als "Rennen zwischen Suchmaschinen und Optimierern" - Ausgang offen. In Deutschland setzt man derweil auf Konsens statt auf Konfrontation. Eine Projektgruppe des Deutschen Multimedia Verbandes (dmmv) soll "Richtlinien für seriöses Suchmaschinen-Marketing" erarbeiten. Dahinter steckt die Vermutung, dass auch die Optimierer an sinnvollen Suchergebnissen interessiert sind - die Vorschläge sind freilich nicht bindend. Christoph Huneke, Sprecher des dmmv, ist dennoch zuversichtlich, dass es eine Lösung gibt. Denn ansonsten, so Huneke, "surfen die Leute wieder im Videotext statt im Internet". Kein Wunder, dass Google & Co. die Optimierer ein Dorn im Auge sind. Das amerikanische Mutterhaus des Branchenprimus sah sich deshalb bereits im April letzten Jahres veranlasst, zu rigorosen Maßnahmen zu greifen und sperrte kurzerhand die IP-Adressen des Breitbrand-Providers Comcast, auf dem viele SpamSeiten lagen. Damit wurden aber auch all jene Surfer ausgesperrt, die Comcast einfach nur als Zugangs-Provider nutzten. IP-Adressen will Google deshalb fortan nicht mehr sperren. Man arbeite aber, so Googles PR-Manager Nathan Taylor, mit einem Team von Ingenieuren daran, die Such-Spider gezielt auf die Erkennung von Spam-Seiten "abzurichten". Ein Problem sieht Taylor ohnehin nicht in den neuen Tricks der Werber, denn Google sei "viel widerstandsfähiger" gegen Manipulationsversuche als die Konkurrenz. Eine gewisse Nervosität scheint den Marktführer dennoch befallen zuhaben: Der deutsche Index von Google soll jetzt "deutlich verbessert werden", so Taylor. Ähnliche Absichtserklärungen gibt es auch von der Konkurrenz. So hat Altavista in den USA ebenfalls ein "Spam-Team" gegründet, das "schwarze Listen" von bekannten Übeltätern erstellen und die Link-Analysen verbessern soll. Andreas Hartmann, Product Manager bei Altavista, sieht das derzeit ganz sportlich als "Rennen zwischen Suchmaschinen und Optimierern" - Ausgang offen. In Deutschland setzt man derweil auf Konsens statt auf Konfrontation. Eine Projektgruppe des Deutschen Multimedia Verbandes (dmmv) soll "Richtlinien für seriöses Suchmaschinen-Marketing" erarbeiten. Dahinter steckt die Vermutung, dass auch die Optimierer an sinnvollen Suchergebnissen interessiert sind - die Vorschläge sind freilich nicht bindend. Christoph Huneke, Sprecher des dmmv, ist dennoch zuversichtlich, dass es eine Lösung gibt. Denn ansonsten, so Huneke, "surfen die Leute wieder im Videotext statt im Internet".
  7. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026883294 = product of:
  0.0134416465 = sum of:
    0.0134416465 = product of:
      0.053766586 = sum of:
        0.053766586 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053766586 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  8. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026613104 = product of:
  0.013306552 = sum of:
    0.013306552 = product of:
      0.053226206 = sum of:
        0.053226206 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053226206 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  9. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.00 
    0.0026613104 = product of:
  0.013306552 = sum of:
    0.013306552 = product of:
      0.053226206 = sum of:
        0.053226206 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053226206 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  10. Broder, A.; Kumar, R.; Maghoul, F.; Raghavan, P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Stata, R.; Tomkins, A.; Wiener, J.: Graph structure in the Web (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026268435 = product of:
  0.013134217 = sum of:
    0.013134217 = product of:
      0.03940265 = sum of:
        0.03940265 = weight(_text_:f in 5595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03940265 = score(doc=5595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 5595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5595)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Wu, L.-L.; Chuang, Y.-L.; Chen, P.-Y.: Motivation for using search engines : a two-factor model (2008) 0.00 
    0.0023218233 = product of:
  0.011609117 = sum of:
    0.011609117 = product of:
      0.034827348 = sum of:
        0.034827348 = weight(_text_:f in 3324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034827348 = score(doc=3324,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3324, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3324)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    From a user-centered perspective, an effective search engine needs to attract new users to try out its features, and retain those users so that they continue using the features. In this article, we investigate the relations between users'motivation for using (i.e., trying out and continuing to use) a search engine and the engine's functional features. Based on Herzberg's two-factor theory (F. Herzberg, 2003; F. Herzberg, M. Bernard, & B. Snyderman, 1959), the features can be categorized as hygiene factors and motivation factors. Hygiene factors support the query process and provide a basic task context for information seeking that allows users to access relevant information. Motivation factors, on the other hand, help users navigate (i.e., browse) and comprehend the retrieved information, related to the task-content aspect of information seeking. Given the consistent findings that hygiene factors induce work motivation for a shorter period of time, it is hypothesized that hygiene factors are more effective in attracting users; while motivation factors are more effective in retaining than in attracting users. A survey, with 758 valid participants, was conducted to test the hypotheses. The empirical results provide substantial support for the proposed hypotheses and suggest that the two-factor theory can account for the motivation for using a search engine.
  12. Stalder, F.; Mayer, C.: ¬Der zweite Index : Suchmaschinen, Personalisierung und Überwachung (2009) 0.00 
    0.0023218233 = product of:
  0.011609117 = sum of:
    0.011609117 = product of:
      0.034827348 = sum of:
        0.034827348 = weight(_text_:f in 22) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034827348 = score(doc=22,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 22, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=22)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Deep Search: Politik des Suchens jenseits von Google; Deep Search-Konferenz, Wien, 2008.11.08; eine Veröffentlichung des World-Information Institute. Hrsg.: K. Becker u. F. Stalder
  13. Mayr, P.; Tosques, F.: Webometrische Analysen mit Hilfe der Google Web APIs (2005) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 3189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=3189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3189)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Egger-Sider, F.; Devine, J.: Google, the Invisible Web, and librarians : slaying the research goliath (2005) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Ozumutlu, H.C.; Cavdur, F.: ¬Application of automatic topic identification on Excite Web search engine data logs (2005) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Pieper, D.; Summann, F.: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) : an end-user oriented institutional repository search service (2006) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Handreck, F.; Mönnich, M.W.: Google Scholar als Alternative zu wissenschaftlichen Fachdatenbanken (2008) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Mayer, K.: Zur Soziometrik der Suchmaschinen : ein historischer Überblick der Methodik (2009) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 19) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=19,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 19, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=19)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Deep Search: Politik des Suchens jenseits von Google; Deep Search-Konferenz, Wien, 2008.11.08; eine Veröffentlichung des World-Information Institute. Hrsg.: K. Becker u. F. Stalder
  19. Rogers, R.: Zur Frage der Vergoogelung : Hin zu einer unkritisierbaren Maschine? (2009) 0.00 
    0.0022984878 = product of:
  0.011492439 = sum of:
    0.011492439 = product of:
      0.034477316 = sum of:
        0.034477316 = weight(_text_:f in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034477316 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Deep Search: Politik des Suchens jenseits von Google; Deep Search-Konferenz, Wien, 2008.11.08; eine Veröffentlichung des World-Information Institute. Hrsg.: K. Becker u. F. Stalder
  20. Jörn, F.: Wie Google für uns nach der ominösen Gluonenkraft stöbert : Software-Krabbler machen sich vor der Anfrage auf die Suche - Das Netz ist etwa fünfhundertmal größer als alles Durchforschte (2001) 0.00 
    0.0020737962 = product of:
  0.0051844902 = sum of:
    0.0032835542 = product of:
      0.009850662 = sum of:
        0.009850662 = weight(_text_:f in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009850662 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11184496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.08807426 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0019009359 = product of:
      0.0076037436 = sum of:
        0.0076037436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076037436 = score(doc=3684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09826468 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028060954 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3684)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2005 9:52:00

Authors

Languages

  • d 82
  • e 40

Types

  • a 109
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • x 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications