Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Oppenheim, C."
  1. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.05
    0.045119084 = product of:
      0.13535725 = sum of:
        0.10438694 = weight(_text_:themes in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10438694 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29391772 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
        0.030970303 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030970303 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16009413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  2. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.01
    0.008258747 = product of:
      0.04955248 = sum of:
        0.04955248 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04955248 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16009413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  3. Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.01
    0.008258747 = product of:
      0.04955248 = sum of:
        0.04955248 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04955248 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16009413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
  4. Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.01
    0.00619406 = product of:
      0.03716436 = sum of:
        0.03716436 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03716436 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16009413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
  5. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.01
    0.00619406 = product of:
      0.03716436 = sum of:
        0.03716436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03716436 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16009413 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04571728 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45