Search (3742 results, page 1 of 188)

0.18774137 = sum of:
  0.15892619 = product of:
    0.47677854 = sum of:
      0.47677854 = weight(_text_:theses in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.47677854 = score(doc=673,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          1.2590348 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02881518 = product of:
    0.05763036 = sum of:
      0.05763036 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05763036 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library

Source

Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25

0.16868936 = product of:
  0.3373787 = sum of:
    0.3373787 = product of:
      0.6747574 = sum of:
        0.6747574 = weight(_text_:mixing in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6747574 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            1.4010615 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.1642737 = sum of:
  0.13906041 = product of:
    0.41718122 = sum of:
      0.41718122 = weight(_text_:theses in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.41718122 = score(doc=601,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          1.1016554 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.025213283 = product of:
    0.050426565 = sum of:
      0.050426565 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050426565 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125

0.14119297 = sum of:
  0.112377785 = product of:
    0.33713335 = sum of:
      0.33713335 = weight(_text_:theses in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.33713335 = score(doc=5092,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.890272 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02881518 = product of:
    0.05763036 = sum of:
      0.05763036 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05763036 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science

0.14080602 = sum of:
  0.11919464 = product of:
    0.3575839 = sum of:
      0.3575839 = weight(_text_:theses in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3575839 = score(doc=5736,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.9442761 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021611385 = product of:
    0.04322277 = sum of:
      0.04322277 = weight(_text_:22 in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04322277 = score(doc=5736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports the work of the ad hoc task force, coordinated by the Scholarly Communications Project (SCP) at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to discuss the best means of cataloguing the theses palnned to be produced directly in electronic forms by postgraduate students. The main goals were to determine a process for handling electronic theses so that access would be at least as good as for hard copy and to find a way to derive cataloguing information from the electronic text and avoid rekeying as much as possible. An important part of the study was the application of existing MARC format tagged record structures to the new system. Concludes with brief notes on the concerns of UMI regarding Internet access of electronic theses

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.1204924 = product of:
  0.2409848 = sum of:
    0.2409848 = product of:
      0.4819696 = sum of:
        0.4819696 = weight(_text_:mixing in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4819696 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            1.0007583 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Mixing philosophy and neurophysiology, Damasion explores the subject of human consciousness and argues that it arose out of the development of emotion

0.108278275 = sum of:
  0.079463094 = product of:
    0.23838927 = sum of:
      0.23838927 = weight(_text_:theses in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23838927 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.6295174 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02881518 = product of:
    0.05763036 = sum of:
      0.05763036 = weight(_text_:22 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05763036 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Article appearing as part of an issue devoted to the theme, Serials Cataloguing: Modern Perspectives and International Developments. Pt.2. In 1988, a revision of AACR2 and a revised edition of the ISBD for serials were published. Discusses and compares the origins of theses 2 standards and their relationship. Describes the inconsistencies between the 2 texts and evaluates their compatibility. Concludes that there is a high degree of compatability on major points but that relatively little progress has been made since the original editions in reducing the substantial number of minor differences

Source

Serials librarian. 22(1992) no.3/4, S.249-262

0.108278275 = sum of:
  0.079463094 = product of:
    0.23838927 = sum of:
      0.23838927 = weight(_text_:theses in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23838927 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.6295174 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02881518 = product of:
    0.05763036 = sum of:
      0.05763036 = weight(_text_:22 in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05763036 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study is a citation analysis of a set of theses and dissertations in the Ohio State University's online catalog, for which the author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) are known. Correlations are sought between the types and ages of resources cited and the number of unique keywords and unique LCSH that were found. The author presents results found in three general discipline areas: arts and humanities, the social sciences, and science, technology, engineering, and medicine.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.106059365 = sum of:
  0.08444798 = product of:
    0.25334394 = sum of:
      0.25334394 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25334394 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.45077547 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021611385 = product of:
    0.04322277 = sum of:
      0.04322277 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04322277 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.10589472 = sum of:
  0.08428334 = product of:
    0.25285 = sum of:
      0.25285 = weight(_text_:theses in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25285 = score(doc=3602,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.667704 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021611385 = product of:
    0.04322277 = sum of:
      0.04322277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04322277 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.10224118 = product of:
  0.20448236 = sum of:
    0.20448236 = product of:
      0.40896472 = sum of:
        0.40896472 = weight(_text_:mixing in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40896472 = score(doc=3773,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.8491715 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For information retrieval in the Chinese language, 3 representation methods for texts are popular, namely: 1-gram or character, bigram, and short-word. Each has its advantages as well as drawbacks. Employing more than one method may combine advantages from them and enhance retrieval effectiveness. We investigated 2 ways of using them simultaneously: mixing representations in documents and queries, and combining retrieval lists obtained via different representations. The experiments were done with the 170 MB evaluated Chinese corpora and 54 long and short queries available from the TREC program and using our Probabilistic Indexing and Retrieval Components System (PIRCS retrieval system). Experiments show that good retrieval need not depend on accurate word segmentation; approximate segmentation into short-words will do. Results also show and confirm that bigram representation alone works well; mixing characters with bigram representation boosts effectiveness further, but it is preferable to mix characters with short-word indexing which is more efficient, needs less resource, and gives better retrieval more often. Cobining retrieval lists from short-word with character representation and from bigram indexing provides the best retrieval results but also at a substabtial cost

0.09639391 = product of:
  0.19278783 = sum of:
    0.19278783 = product of:
      0.38557565 = sum of:
        0.38557565 = weight(_text_:mixing in 8410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38557565 = score(doc=8410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.8006066 = fieldWeight in 8410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Investigates the issues raised by mixing dynamic formatting and structured manipulation. Analyses the needs for specifying and implementing document layout and presents the state of the art in this area. Enumerates the desired requirements for interactive editing and formatting. Describes a method for implementing dynamic formatting in the Grif editor. Analyses, in the light of the experience gained with Grif, how standards can model dynamic formatting for structured documents

0.09639391 = product of:
  0.19278783 = sum of:
    0.19278783 = product of:
      0.38557565 = sum of:
        0.38557565 = weight(_text_:mixing in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38557565 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.8006066 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Hybrid systems physically deliver some amount of electronically accessible information to user, such as on CD-ROM, and augment that with information from another source, delivered on a different media. Examines the potential for hybrid application, the technology required and some considerations in mixing different methods. Discusses examples of real world applications, describing the choices available to users and the reasons for developing these new hybrid applications

0.09474349 = sum of:
  0.069530204 = product of:
    0.20859061 = sum of:
      0.20859061 = weight(_text_:theses in 1396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20859061 = score(doc=1396,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.5508277 = fieldWeight in 1396, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1396)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.025213283 = product of:
    0.050426565 = sum of:
      0.050426565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050426565 = score(doc=1396,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1396, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1396)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Asserts that UK public libraries are now busier than ever and are facing higher public expectations of the services on offer. Explores some of the possible reasons for this. Government initiatives including the Citizen's Charter, as well as fundamental changes in all areas of the education systems, are highlighted as being major contributions to the changes in usage. The introduction of the National Curriculum, the impact of open learning courses and reduced personal and instituional spending power within academic libraries have prompted both teachers and students to turn in increasing numbers to the public reference library. Discusses some of the implications for the management of theses services and outlines some possible strategies for the future

Source

Library management. 15(1994) no.6, S.20-22

0.08838281 = sum of:
  0.07037333 = product of:
    0.21111996 = sum of:
      0.21111996 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21111996 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.45077547 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.018009488 = product of:
    0.036018975 = sum of:
      0.036018975 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036018975 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18619213 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053169955 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.08602132 = product of:
  0.17204264 = sum of:
    0.17204264 = product of:
      0.5161279 = sum of:
        0.5161279 = weight(_text_:theses in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5161279 = score(doc=334,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.37868577 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            1.3629451 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Where rules exist for cataloging of dissertations, libraries follow the rules. Where no rules exist, libraries are forced to improvise. Libraries improvise with invented call numbers and with invented access points for theses as theses.

0.08444798 = product of:
  0.16889596 = sum of:
    0.16889596 = product of:
      0.5066879 = sum of:
        0.5066879 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5066879 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.45077547 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.08434468 = product of:
  0.16868936 = sum of:
    0.16868936 = product of:
      0.3373787 = sum of:
        0.3373787 = weight(_text_:mixing in 1556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3373787 = score(doc=1556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.70053077 = fieldWeight in 1556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1556)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Building on the approach of Sir Ernest Gombrich, seven basic functions or goals of art are outlined as a new framework for the classification of fine art and visual images: connecting, ordering, matching, systematizing, mixing, internalizing and externalizing. It is suggested why only the first two of these goals, connecting and ordering, tend to produce closed repertoires of images, whereas the other goals stimulate open repertoires of images. A chief reason for these open repertoires was found in an interplay between visualization and verbalization which increased with the advent of printing

0.08434468 = product of:
  0.16868936 = sum of:
    0.16868936 = product of:
      0.3373787 = sum of:
        0.3373787 = weight(_text_:mixing in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3373787 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.70053077 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We analyze the large-scale structure of the journal citation network built from information contained in the Thomson-Reuters Journal Citation Reports. To this end, we explore network properties such as density, percolation robustness, average and largest node distances, reciprocity, incoming and outgoing degree distributions, and assortative mixing by node degrees. We discover that the journal citation network is a dense, robust, small, and reciprocal world. Furthermore, in- and outdegree node distributions display long tails, with few vital journals and many trivial ones, and they are strongly positively correlated.

0.08434468 = product of:
  0.16868936 = sum of:
    0.16868936 = product of:
      0.3373787 = sum of:
        0.3373787 = weight(_text_:mixing in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3373787 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4816044 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053169955 = queryNorm
            0.70053077 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.05783 = idf(docFreq=13, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Mixed methods research (MMR) has been described as the third research paradigm that combines qualitative and quantitative research methods. The mixing of research methods requires an epistemological framework that embraces the "reality" uncovered by different research methods. Three formal ontological categories are introduced for deconstructing the polarized view of reality in objectivism and relativism and for differentiating the nature and characteristics of objective, subjective, and normative validity claims as well as the conditions for justifying "objectivity" in social research. The characterization of "information" as objective, subjective, and normative-evaluative simultaneously demands the study of conditions of information-related phenomena that may call for mixed methods research in library and information science.