Search (3729 results, page 1 of 187)

  1. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.30
    0.30489263 = product of:
      0.60978526 = sum of:
        0.5440264 = weight(_text_:theses in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5440264 = score(doc=673,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.2590348 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
        0.0657589 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0657589 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  2. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.27
    0.26678103 = product of:
      0.53356206 = sum of:
        0.47602305 = weight(_text_:theses in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47602305 = score(doc=601,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.1016554 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
        0.05753904 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05753904 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
  3. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.23
    0.22866948 = product of:
      0.45733896 = sum of:
        0.40801978 = weight(_text_:theses in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40801978 = score(doc=5736,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.9442761 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
        0.049319174 = weight(_text_:22 in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049319174 = score(doc=5736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the work of the ad hoc task force, coordinated by the Scholarly Communications Project (SCP) at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to discuss the best means of cataloguing the theses palnned to be produced directly in electronic forms by postgraduate students. The main goals were to determine a process for handling electronic theses so that access would be at least as good as for hard copy and to find a way to derive cataloguing information from the electronic text and avoid rekeying as much as possible. An important part of the study was the application of existing MARC format tagged record structures to the new system. Concludes with brief notes on the concerns of UMI regarding Internet access of electronic theses
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  4. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.23
    0.22522181 = product of:
      0.45044363 = sum of:
        0.38468474 = weight(_text_:theses in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38468474 = score(doc=5092,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.890272 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
        0.0657589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0657589 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.17
    0.16919816 = product of:
      0.3383963 = sum of:
        0.28907713 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28907713 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5143556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.049319174 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049319174 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.17
    0.16891636 = product of:
      0.33783272 = sum of:
        0.28851354 = weight(_text_:theses in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28851354 = score(doc=3602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.667704 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.049319174 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049319174 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Callahan, P.F.: ISBD(S) revised edition and AACR2 1988 revision : a comparison (1992) 0.17
    0.16888604 = product of:
      0.33777207 = sum of:
        0.2720132 = weight(_text_:theses in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720132 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.6295174 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
        0.0657589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0657589 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Article appearing as part of an issue devoted to the theme, Serials Cataloguing: Modern Perspectives and International Developments. Pt.2. In 1988, a revision of AACR2 and a revised edition of the ISBD for serials were published. Discusses and compares the origins of theses 2 standards and their relationship. Describes the inconsistencies between the 2 texts and evaluates their compatibility. Concludes that there is a high degree of compatability on major points but that relatively little progress has been made since the original editions in reducing the substantial number of minor differences
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992) no.3/4, S.249-262
  8. Strader, C.R.: Citation analysis (2012) 0.17
    0.16888604 = product of:
      0.33777207 = sum of:
        0.2720132 = weight(_text_:theses in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2720132 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.6295174 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
        0.0657589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0657589 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study is a citation analysis of a set of theses and dissertations in the Ohio State University's online catalog, for which the author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) are known. Correlations are sought between the types and ages of resources cited and the number of unique keywords and unique LCSH that were found. The author presents results found in three general discipline areas: arts and humanities, the social sciences, and science, technology, engineering, and medicine.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Swah, G.; Marsland, G.: Current trends in the use of the public library information centre (1994) 0.15
    0.14777528 = product of:
      0.29555055 = sum of:
        0.23801152 = weight(_text_:theses in 1396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23801152 = score(doc=1396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.5508277 = fieldWeight in 1396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1396)
        0.05753904 = weight(_text_:22 in 1396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05753904 = score(doc=1396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1396)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Asserts that UK public libraries are now busier than ever and are facing higher public expectations of the services on offer. Explores some of the possible reasons for this. Government initiatives including the Citizen's Charter, as well as fundamental changes in all areas of the education systems, are highlighted as being major contributions to the changes in usage. The introduction of the National Curriculum, the impact of open learning courses and reduced personal and instituional spending power within academic libraries have prompted both teachers and students to turn in increasing numbers to the public reference library. Discusses some of the implications for the management of theses services and outlines some possible strategies for the future
    Source
    Library management. 15(1994) no.6, S.20-22
  10. Harris, G.; Huffman, R.: Cataloging of theses : a survey (1985) 0.15
    0.14723144 = product of:
      0.5889258 = sum of:
        0.5889258 = weight(_text_:theses in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5889258 = score(doc=334,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.3629451 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Where rules exist for cataloging of dissertations, libraries follow the rules. Where no rules exist, libraries are forced to improvise. Libraries improvise with invented call numbers and with invented access points for theses as theses.
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.14
    0.14453857 = product of:
      0.57815427 = sum of:
        0.57815427 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.57815427 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5143556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.14
    0.14099847 = product of:
      0.28199694 = sum of:
        0.24089761 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24089761 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5143556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.041099314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041099314 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  13. Guide to the availability of theses (1981) 0.14
    0.1360066 = product of:
      0.5440264 = sum of:
        0.5440264 = weight(_text_:theses in 3873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5440264 = score(doc=3873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.2590348 = fieldWeight in 3873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3873)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.12
    0.120448805 = product of:
      0.48179522 = sum of:
        0.48179522 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48179522 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5143556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  15. Doyle, J.; Patil, R.S.: Two theses of knowledge representation : language restrictions, taxonomic classification, and the utility of representation services (1991) 0.12
    0.11900576 = product of:
      0.47602305 = sum of:
        0.47602305 = weight(_text_:theses in 6322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47602305 = score(doc=6322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.1016554 = fieldWeight in 6322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6322)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Guide to the availability of theses : 2: Non-university institutions (1984) 0.12
    0.11900576 = product of:
      0.47602305 = sum of:
        0.47602305 = weight(_text_:theses in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47602305 = score(doc=2468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.1016554 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Khurshid, Z.: Improvisations in cataloging of theses and dissertations (1995) 0.12
    0.11778516 = product of:
      0.47114065 = sum of:
        0.47114065 = weight(_text_:theses in 3016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47114065 = score(doc=3016,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.0903561 = fieldWeight in 3016, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3016)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Existing subject headings lists and classification schemes are inadequate to deal with the very specific and rapidly developing subjects of theses and dissertations, and as a result libraries find it costly and time consuming to perform original and full cataloguing of these materials. Many libraries have been forced to improvise on descriptive and subject cataloguing to reduce the processing cost. Describes the improvisations of the Library of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in Dharan, Saudi Arabia, in cataloguing local and foreign theses and dissertations
  18. Ressel, M.; Smith, V.T.: ¬A new approach to thesis subject analysis : a collaborative success (1998) 0.12
    0.11778516 = product of:
      0.47114065 = sum of:
        0.47114065 = weight(_text_:theses in 4666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47114065 = score(doc=4666,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            1.0903561 = fieldWeight in 4666, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4666)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the challenge of assigning subject headings to academic theses and dissertations in a timely and cost effective manner. Describes a collaborative effort between cataloguer and subject bibliographer at the Nevada University at Reno. The project has proven effective in getting theses processed in reduced time and with less total time spent cataloguing and analysing the items. Concludes that utilizing the knowledge of the subject specialist has also provided improved subject access, particularly in highly specialized theses and dissertations
  19. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.11
    0.11261091 = product of:
      0.22522181 = sum of:
        0.19234237 = weight(_text_:theses in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19234237 = score(doc=1442,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.445136 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
        0.03287945 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03287945 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The main objective of this research was to analyze whether there was a characteristic distribution behavior of relevant terms over a scientific text that could contribute as a criterion for their process of automatic indexing. The terms considered in this study were only full noun phrases contained in the texts themselves. The texts were considered a total of 98 doctoral theses of the eight areas of knowledge in a same university. Initially, 20 full noun phrases were automatically extracted from each text as candidates to be the most relevant terms, and each author of each text assigned a relevance value 0-6 (not relevant and highly relevant, respectively) for each of the 20 noun phrases sent. Only, 22.1 % of noun phrases were considered not relevant. A relevance values of the terms assigned by the authors were associated with their positions in the text. Each full noun phrases found in the text was considered as a valid linear position. The results that were obtained showed values resulting from this distribution by considering two types of position: linear, with values consolidated into ten equal consecutive parts; and structural, considering parts of the text (such as introduction, development and conclusion). As a result of considerable importance, all areas of knowledge related to the Natural Sciences showed a characteristic behavior in the distribution of relevant terms, as well as all areas of knowledge related to Social Sciences showed the same characteristic behavior of distribution, but distinct from the Natural Sciences. The difference of the distribution behavior between the Natural and Social Sciences can be clearly visualized through graphs. All behaviors, including the general behavior of all areas of knowledge together, were characterized in polynomial equations and can be applied in future as criteria for automatic indexing. Until the present date this work has become inedited of for two reasons: to present a method for characterizing the distribution of relevant terms in a scientific text, and also, through this method, pointing out a quantitative trait difference between the Natural and Social Sciences.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Electronic resources : selection and bibliograhic control (1996) 0.11
    0.105553776 = product of:
      0.21110755 = sum of:
        0.17000824 = weight(_text_:theses in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17000824 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43209797 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.39344835 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.122176 = idf(docFreq=96, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
        0.041099314 = weight(_text_:22 in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041099314 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21245381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060669374 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: JOHNSON, P.: Selecting electronic resources: developing a local decision-making matrix: MANDEL, C.A. u. R. WOLVEN: Intellectual access to digital documents: joining proven principles with new technologies; CAPLAN, P. u. R. GUENTHER: Metadata for Internet resources: the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC; BRUGGER, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries; SEAMAN, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts; MARTIN, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia; HILLMANN, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships: envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net; McMILLAN, D.I.: Electronic theses and dissertations: merging perspectives; NICHOLSON, D. u. M. STEELE: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet; MORGAN, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloguing services; DAVIS-BROWN, B. u. D. WILLIAMSON: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age; DILLON, M. u. E. JUL: Cataloging Internet resources: the convergence of libraries and Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

Languages

Types

  • a 3123
  • m 348
  • el 163
  • s 143
  • b 40
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications