Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.
© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 04. Juni 2021)
1Barité, M, ; Rauch, M.: Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature (CSKOL) : its update, a pending task?.
In: Knowledge Organization at the Interface: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark. Eds.: M. Lykke et al. Heidelberg : Baden Baden, 2020. S.460-464.
(Advances in knowledge organization; vol.17)
Inhalt: Vgl.: DOI: 10.5771/9783956507762-460.
Objekt: CSKOL ; ICC
2Barité, M. ; Rauch, M. ; Brozia, A.I. ; Morales, M.: Literary warrant-based approach to organize KO terminology : criteria and method.
In: Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira. Baden-Baden : Ergon Verlag, 2018. S.339-346.
(Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16)
3Barité, M. ; Rauch, M.: Systematifier : in rescue of a useful tool in domain analysis.
In: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.615-623.
Abstract: Literature on the systematifier is remarkably limited in knowledge organization. Dahlberg created the procedure in the seventies as a guide for the construction of classification systems and showed its applicability in systems she developed. According to her initial conception, all disciplines should be structured in the following sequence: Foundations and theories-Subjects of study-Methods-Influences-Applications-Environment. The nature of the procedure is determined in this study and the concept is situated in relation with the domain analysis methodologies. As a tool for the organization of the map of a certain domain, it is associated with a rationalist perspective and the top-down design of systems construction. It would require a reassessment of its scope in order to ensure its applicability to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary domains. Among other conclusions, it is highlighted that the greatest potential of the systematifier is given by the fact that-as a methodological device-it can act as: i)an analyzer of a subject area; ii)an organizer of its main terms; and, iii)an identifier of links, bridges and intersection points with other knowledge areas.
Inhalt: Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Brazil: IV Congresso Brasileiro em Organização e Representação do Conhecimento, 19-21 de setembro de 2017, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil.
Themenfeld: Universale Facettenklassifikationen