Literatur zur Informationserschließung

Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.

© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 28. April 2022)

Suchergebnisse

• 1
  Samples, J. ; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.403-417.
  
  Abstract: The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1751764.
  
  Anmerkung: Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
  
  Themenfeld: Datenformate ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: MARC ; BIBFRAME
  Land/Ort: USA
  
  
• 2
  Sfakakis, M. ; Zapounidou, S. ; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from BIBFRAME 2.0 to RDA.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.7, S.603-631.
  
  Abstract: The mapping from BIBFRAME 2.0 to Resource Description and Access (RDA) is studied focusing on core entities, inherent relationships, and derivative relationships. The proposed mapping rules are evaluated with two gold datasets. Findings indicate that 1) core entities, inherent and derivative relationships may be mapped to RDA, 2) the use of the bf:hasExpression property may cluster bf:Works with the same ideational content and enable their mapping to RDA Works with their Expressions, and 3) cataloging policies have a significant impact on the interoperability between RDA and BIBFRAME datasets. This work complements the investigation of semantic interoperability between the two models previously presented in this journal.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1821856.
  
  Themenfeld: Semantische Interoperabilität ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME
  Land/Ort: RDA
  
  
• 3
  Zapounidou, S. ; Sfakakis, M. ; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME 2.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 57(2019) no.5, S.278-308.
  
  Abstract: Semantic interoperability between Resource Description and Access (RDA) and BIBFRAME models is of great interest to the library community. In this context, this work investigates the mapping of core entities, inherent and derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME, and proposes mapping rules assessed using two gold datasets. Findings indicate that RDA core entities and inherent relationships can be successfully mapped to BIBFRAME using the bf:hasExpression property, while extending bf:hasExpression as transitive simplifies BIBFRAME representations. Moreover, mapping derivative relationships between RDA Expressions was successful with loss of specificity in non-translation cases. The mapping of derivative relationships between RDA Works produced "noisy" bf:hasDerivative occurrences in BIBFRAME.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1650152.
  
  Themenfeld: Semantische Interoperabilität ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: RDA ; BIBFRAME
  
  
• 4
  Taniguchi, S.: Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.5/6, S.354-373.
  
  Abstract: Zusammenfassung von FRBR, FRAD und FRSAD in einem Modell (vgl. das Modell selbst).
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1501457.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME 2.0 ; IFLA Library Reference Model ; FRBR ; FRAD ; FRSAD
  
  
• 5
  Taniguchi, S.: Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources?.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.1, S.40-61.
  
  Abstract: Knowledge organization systems have been studied in several fields and for different and complementary aspects. Among the aspects that concentrate common interests, in this article we highlight those related to the terminological and conceptual relationships among the components of any knowledge organization system. This research aims to contribute to the critical analysis of knowledge organization systems, especially ontologies, thesauri, and classification systems, by the comprehension of its similarities and differences when dealing with concepts and their ways of relating to each other as well as to the conceptual design that is adopted.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1382643.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME 2.0 ; RDF
  
  
• 6
  Xu, A. ; Hess, K. ; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.2/3, S.224-250.
  
  Abstract: One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1388326.
  
  Anmerkung: Beitrag in einem Heft: 'Setting standards to work and live by: A memorial Festschrift for Valerie Bross'.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung ; Datenformate
  Objekt: MARC ; BIBFRAME 2.0
  
  
• 7
  Balster, K. ; Rendall, R. ; Shrader, T.: Linked serial data : mapping the CONSER standard record to BIBFRAME.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.2/3, S.251-261.
  
  Abstract: The CONSER BIBFRAME mapping project began in December 2015, and completed a mapping between the elements of the CONSER Standard Record and BIBFRAME 1.0. Subsequently, the group has converted that mapping to BIBFRAME 2.0, developed sample RDF serializations for each element, and is developing recommendations for PCC best practices. This article summarizes CONSER BIBFRAME mapping outcomes, describes Valerie Bross' contributions to the project, and presents topics for further consideration within the PCC: BIBFRAME development, and serials cataloging communities, including: changes to the description, literal vs. machine actionable data, enumeration and chronology information, modeling issues, and relationships.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1364316.
  
  Anmerkung: Beitrag in einem Heft: 'Setting standards to work and live by: A memorial Festschrift for Valerie Bross'.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: CONSER ; BIBFRAME 2.0
  
  
• 8
  Edmunds, J.: Roadmap to nowhere : BIBFLOW, BIBFRAME, and linked data for libraries.[21.04.2017].
  In: https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/files/44558d45t.
  
  Abstract: On December 12, 2016, Carl Stahmer and MacKenzie Smith presented at the CNI Members Fall Meeting about the BIBFLOW project, self-described on Twitter as "a two-year project of the UC Davis University Library and Zepheira investigating the future of library technical services." In her opening remarks, Ms. Smith, University Librarian at UC Davis, stated that one of the goals of the project was to devise a roadmap "to get from where we are today, which is kind of the 1970s with a little lipstick on it, to 2020, which is where we're going to be very soon." The notion that where libraries are today is somehow behind the times is one of the commonly heard rationales behind a move to linked data. Stated more precisely: - Libraries devote considerable time and resources to producing high-quality bibliographic metadata - This metadata is stored in unconnected silos - This metadata is in a format (MARC) that is incompatible with technologies of the emerging Semantic Web - The visibility of library metadata is diminished as a result of the two points above Are these assertions true? If yes, is linked data the solution?
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung ; Metadaten
  Objekt: BIBFLOW ; BIBFRAME
  
  
• 9
  Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity.
  In: http://www.iskocus.org/NASKO2017papers/NASKO2017_paper_1.pdf [NASKO 2017, June 15-16, 2017, Champaign, IL, USA].
  
  Abstract: Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  
  Inhalt: Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
  
  Themenfeld: Geschichte der Kataloge ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: FRBR ; BIBFRAME
  
  
• 10
  Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity.
  In: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.592-604.
  
  Abstract: Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  
  Inhalt: Beitrag eines Special Issue: Select Papers from ISKO Chapter Conferences 2017 ISKO-Canada/US: Sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities, June 15-17, 2017, Champaign, IL, USA .
  
  Themenfeld: Geschichte der Kataloge ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME
  Hilfsmittel: FRBR
  
  
• 11
  Taniguchi, S.: Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.6, S.387-412.
  
  Abstract: This article examines BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema, that is, whether the present BIBFRAME is suitable for exchange and sharing of metadata created with RDA. First, an overview of RDA and BIBFRAME models is provided. Second, mapping examples of metadata records and part of the mapping tables from RDA to BIBFRAME are demonstrated. Third, some issues involved in the mapping are investigated: treatment of RDA Expression in BIBFRAME, mapping of RDA elements to BIBFRAME properties, and conversion of extant MARC21 bibliographic records to BIBFRAME metadata.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: RDA ; BIBFRAME
  
  
• 12
  Guerrini, M. ; Possemato, T.: From record management to data management : RDA and new application models BIBFRAME, RIMMF, and OliSuite/WeCat.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.3, S.179-199.
  
  Abstract: The reflection provoked by RDA produced the awareness that the flat format of MARC 21 records is inadequate in expressing the relationships between bibliographic entities that the FRBR model and RDA standard consider fundamental. RIMMF and BIBFRAME indicate to software developers a way to think that is consistent with RDA. In Italy, @Cult, a software house and bibliographic agency working for Casalini Libri, has taken on the charge of following and facilitating the transition: OliSuite/WeCat provides an implementation of RDA that integrates vocabularies and ontologies already present in the Web by structuring the information in linked open data.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1144667.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: RDA ; BIBFRAME ; RIMMF ; OliSuite/WeCat
  
  
• 13
  Meßmer, G. ; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen.
  In: Praxishandbuch Bibliotheksmanagement. Hrsg.: R. Griebel, u.a. Bd.1. Berlin : DeGruyter Saur, 2015. S.341-356.
  
  Inhalt: Kapitel 5.1.
  
  Anmerkung: Volltext unter: ..\Meßmer_Müller_Formalerschließung_Praxishb_Bibliotheksmgmt.pdf.
  
  Themenfeld: Katalogfragen allgemein ; Formalerschließung ; Datenformate ; Normdateien
  Objekt: RAK ; RDA ; MAB ; MARC ; BIBFRAME ; GND
  Land/Ort: D
  
  
• 14
  Miller, E. ; Ogbuji, U.: Linked data design for the visible library.
  In: Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.23-29.
  
  Abstract: In response to libraries' frustration over their rich resources being invisible on the web, Zepheira, at the request of the Library of Congress, created BIBFRAME, a bibliographic metadata framework for cataloging. The model replaces MARC records with linked data, promoting resource visibility through a rich network of links. In place of formal taxonomies, a small but extensible vocabulary streamlines metadata efforts. Rather than using a unique bibliographic record to describe one item, BIBFRAME draws on the Dublin Core and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to generate formalized descriptions of Work, Instance, Authority and Annotation as well as associations between items. Zepheira trains librarians to transform MARC records to BIBFRAME resources and adapt the vocabulary for specialized needs, while subject matter experts and technical experts manage content, site design and usability. With a different approach toward data modeling and metadata, previously invisible resources gain visibility through linking.
  
  Anmerkung: Contribution to a special section "Linked data and the charm of weak semantics".
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung ; Datenformate
  Objekt: BIBFRAME ; FRBR ; RDA ; Zepheira
  
  
• 15
  BIBFRAME Relationships.Draft Specification (25 April 2014).
  In: http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-relationships.html.
  
  Abstract: A BIBFRAME Relationship is a relationship between a BIBFRAME Work or Instance and another BIBFRAME Work or Instance. Thus there are four types of relationships: Work to Work - Work to Instance - Instance to Work - Instance to Instance
  
  Inhalt: Enthält tabellarische Übersichten der Relationen.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME
  
  
• 16
  Zapounidou, S. ; Sfakakis, M. ; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM.
  In: Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al. Cham : Springer, 2014. S.262-273.
  (Communications in computer and information science; 478)
  
  Abstract: Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
  
  Themenfeld: Metadaten ; Datenformate ; Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME
  
  
• 17
  AG KIM Gruppe Titeldaten DINI: Empfehlungen zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliografischer Daten.
  In: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/dini-schriften/2014-14/PDF/14-de.pdf.
  (DINI-Schriften; 14)
  
  Abstract: In den letzten Jahren wurde eine Vielzahl an Datensets aus Kultur- und Wissenschaftseinrichtungen als Linked Open Data veröffentlicht. Auch das deutsche Bibliothekswesen hat sich aktiv an den Entwicklungen im Bereich Linked Data beteiligt. Die zuvor lediglich in den Bibliothekskatalogen vorliegenden Daten können weiteren Sparten geöffnet und so auf vielfältige Weise in externe Anwendungen eingebunden werden. Gemeinsames Ziel bei der Veröffentlichung der Bibliotheksdaten als Linked Data ist außerdem, Interoperabilität und Nachnutzbarkeit zu ermöglichen und sich auf diese Weise stärker mit anderen Domänen außerhalb der Bibliothekswelt zu vernetzen. Es bestehen sowohl Linked-Data-Services einzelner Bibliotheken als auch der deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde. Trotz ihres gemeinsamen Ziels sprechen die bestehenden Services nicht die gleiche Sprache, da sie auf unterschiedlichen Modellierungen basieren. Um die Interoperabilität dieser Datenquellen zu gewährleisten, sollten die Dienste künftig einer einheitlichen Modellierung folgen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde im Januar 2012 eine Arbeitsgruppe gegründet, in der alle deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek sowie einige weitere interessierte und engagierte Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit entsprechender Expertise vertreten sind. Die Gruppe Titeldaten agiert seit April 2012 als Untergruppe des Kompetenzzentrums Interoperable Metadaten (DINI-AG KIM). Die Moderation und Koordination liegt bei der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Im Dezember 2012 schloss sich auch der OBVSG der Arbeitsgruppe an. Die Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek folgte im Mai 2013. Vorliegende Empfehlungen sollen zu einer Harmonisierung der RDFRepräsentationen von Titeldaten im deutschsprachigen Raum beitragen und so möglichst einen Quasi-Standard etablieren. Auch international wird an der Herausforderung gearbeitet, die bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen in die heute zur Verfügung stehenden Konzepte des Semantic Web zu überführen und ihren Mehrwert auszuschöpfen. Die neuesten internationalen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Bereitstellung bibliografischer Daten im Semantic Web wie die Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative der Library of Congress (BIBFRAME) haben ebenfalls das Ziel, ein Modell zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliothekarischer Daten bereitzustellen. Die Gruppe Titeldaten beobachtet diese Entwicklungen und beabsichtigt, die Erfahrungen und Anforderungen der deutschsprachigen Bibliothekswelt mit einzubringen. Dabei werden einerseits international erarbeitete Empfehlungen aufgegriffen und andererseits Impulse aus der nationalen Kooperation dort eingebracht. Die hier verwendeten Properties könnten z. B. als Grundlage für ein Mapping zu BIBFRAME dienen.
  
  Inhalt: Enthält Übersicht der RDF-Elemente für die bibliografischen Relationen. Vgl.: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100217673. Version 2.0 unter: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/2153.3-7 (vgl. Mail an Inetbib vom 08.01.2019). Webversion unter: https://wiki.dnb.de/x/cYMOB.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME ; RDF
  
  
• 18
  BIBFRAME Model Overview.
  In: http://bibframe.org/.
  
  Abstract: The Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative. BIBFRAME.ORG is a central hub for this effort.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl. Kommentar Eversberg: Wer dranbleiben will am Puls der Zeit und speziell an der sich dynamisierenden Evolution eines neuen Datenformatkonzepts, der sollte sich langsam beeilen, sich mit BIBFRAME vertraut zu machen: http://bibframe.org Diese Startseite organisiert nun den Zugang zu allem, was schon vorliegt und präsentabel ist, und das ist allerhand. Wer erst mal nur schnuppern will und schauen, wie denn BIBFRAME-Daten wohl aussehen, gehe zur "demonstration area", wo man u.a. auch aufbereitete Daten der DNB findet. Es gibt ferner Online Tools, und darunter einen "Transformation service", dem man eigenes MARC-XML übergeben kann, damit er was draus mache. [Exporte mit unserem MARCXML.APR klappen nicht unmittelbar, man muß zumindest die in der Datei schon vorhandenen zwei Kopfzeilen aktivieren und ans Ende noch setzen. Und hierarchische Daten machen noch Probleme, die wir uns vornehmen müssen.] Wer jetzt denkt, "Was geht uns das alles an?", der lese die letzte Zeile, die da lautet: "BIBFRAME.ORG is a collaborative effort of US Library of Congress, Zepheira and you!"
  
  Themenfeld: Datenformate
  Objekt: BIBFRAME ; Zepheira
  
  
• 19
  Kroeger, A.: ¬The road to BIBFRAME : the evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a post-MARC future.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.8, S.873-890.
  
  Abstract: This article provides a representative overview of literature related to the idea of replacing MARC with a linked-data metadata structure, covering the period from 2002 through the 2012 release of the draft of the proposed bibliographic framework, BIBFRAME. Works proposing the replacement of MARC or exploring linked data in a library context are examined. In particular, key documents leading to the creation of the Library of Congress Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative are examined, along with some of the critical responses they received, to better understand the chain of ideas shaping BIBFRAME.
  
  Themenfeld: Formalerschließung
  Objekt: BIBFRAME