Literatur zur Informationserschließung

Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.

© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 04. Juni 2021)

Suchergebnisse

• 1
  Fraser, C.: Mathematics in library and review classification systems : an historical overview.
  In: Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.4, S.334-356.
  (Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization)
  
  Abstract: The modern classification of mathematical subjects occurred within the larger framework of library classification, a project receiving sustained attention in the period from 1870 to the present. The early work of the library cataloguers was carried out against the background of a broad nineteenth-century interest in the classification of knowledge. We explore different views during this period concerning the position of mathematics in the overall scheme of knowledge, the scope of mathematics and the internal organization of the different parts of mathematics. We examine how mathematical books were classified, from the most general level down to the level of particular subject areas in analysis. The focus is on the Library of Congress Classification in its various iterations from 1905 to the present. The article ends with an examination of the Mathematics Subject Classification Scheme employed today by reviewing services Mathematical Reviews in the United States and Zentralblatt in Germany.
  
  Inhalt: DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-4-334.
  
  Wissenschaftsfach: Mathematik
  Objekt: LCC ; MSC
  
  
• 2
  Buente, W. ; Baybayan, C.K. ; Hajibayova, L. ; McCorkhill, M. ; Panchyshyn, R.: Exploring the renaissance of wayfinding and voyaging through the lens of knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems.
  In: Journal of documentation. 76(2020) no.6, S.1279-1293.
  
  Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis from an ethical perspective of how the concept of indigenous wayfinding and voyaging is mapped in knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Library of Congress Subject Headings, the Library of Congress Classifications systems and the Web of Science citation database were methodically examined to determine how these systems represent and facilitate the discovery of indigenous knowledge of wayfinding and voyaging. Findings The analysis revealed that there was no dedicated representation of the indigenous practices of wayfinding and voyaging in the major knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. By scattering indigenous practice across various, often very broad and unrelated classes, coherence in the record is disrupted, resulting in misrepresentation of these indigenous concepts. Originality/value This study contributes to a relatively limited research literature on representation and organization of indigenous knowledge of wayfinding and voyaging. This study calls to foster a better understanding and appreciation for the rich knowledge that indigenous cultures provide for an enlightened society.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2019-0212.
  
  Themenfeld: Wissensrepräsentation
  Objekt: DDC ; LCSH ; LCC ; Web of Science
  
  
• 3
  Lund, B.D. ; Agbaji, D.A.: What scheme do we prefer? : an examination of preference between Library of Congress and Dewey Decimal Classification among U.S.-based academic library employees.
  In: Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.5, S.380-392.
  
  Abstract: Though several studies have been published on the topic of reclassification of academic library collections over the past eight decades since it first gained popularity, none have explored the preferences of academic library employees toward classification schemes beyond a merely superficial level. The preferences of library employees must serve some role in organizational decision-making. By distributing a mixed-methods survey to academic library employees across the United States, the researchers in the present study provide insight into employee preferences. The findings of the study may provide insight into library trends and the future of library classification schemes.
  
  Inhalt: DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-380.
  
  Themenfeld: International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  Objekt: DDC ; LCC
  Land/Ort: USA
  
  
• 4
  Lund, B. ; Agbaji, D.: Use of Dewey Decimal Classification by academic libraries in the United States.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.7, S.653-661.
  
  Abstract: Nearly 25 years have elapsed since the last comprehensive measure of the percentage of academic libraries that employ the Dewey and Library of Congress systems of classification. To provide updated statistics, the researchers surveyed all 3793 academic libraries via their online catalogs. The findings indicate that the use of Dewey has declined over the past four decades. Teachers' Colleges and Community Colleges in particular have higher rates of Dewey use than large research or professional universities. This information may help support academic library reclassification decisions.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1517851.
  
  Themenfeld: International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  Objekt: DDC ; LCC
  Land/Ort: USA
  Anwendungsfeld: Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken
  
  
• 5
  Howard, S.A. ; Knowlton, S.A..: Browsing through bias : the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies.
  In: Library trends. 67(2018) no.1, S.74-88.
  
  Abstract: The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Congress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvantages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of classification for books in these fields, continues to "other" the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.
  
  Inhalt: Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Race and Ethnicity in Library and Information Science: An Update'.
  
  Anmerkung: Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0026.
  
  Objekt: LCC ; LCSH
  
  
• 6
  Liu, H. ; Williams, K.: ¬The development of classes on women's studies in Library of Congress Classification (1970 - 2010).
  In: http://www.iskocus.org/NASKO2017papers/NASKO2017_paper_19.pdf [NASKO 2017, June 15-16, 2017, Champaign, IL, USA].
  
  Abstract: We surveyed the classes on women's studies in different editions in the LCC (from the 1980 to the 2010 edition) to determine what the main classes consisted of and how they changed over that period. We broke down the main subtopics on women's studies, doing a statistical analysis at the class and subclass level, and then selected several typical examples for in-depth examination. The goal was to show the relationship between the disciplinary development of women's studies and classes on this topic in the LCC. We found that studies about women historically interweaved with family and marriage, but its development should have its own avenue. We found six patterns in the revising of classes associated with women's studies: synthesis, analysis, new creation, expansion, class name change, and removal. Through the comparison and analysis of classes with the additions and revisions to LCCs, supplemented by the bibliographic records from the LC online catalog, we determined that: historic revisions of a certain class show its disciplinary development; synthesis, analysis, comparison, and deduction played important roles in revisions and reflected the discipline's self - understanding on a subject; and a threshold, in terms of number of titles (or "sub-sub topics"), can be established for the creation of a new class . We concluded that a well-systematized classification system facilitates predictions concerning new directions in a discipline. Also, revisions of classification, based on the development of a discipline, will influence that discipline's future development.
  
  Inhalt: Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
  
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 7
  Freeborn, R.B.: Planning, implementing, and assessing a CD reclassification project.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.7/8, S.578-587.
  
  Abstract: In 2015, plans were put in place to relocate the entire compact disc collection of the Music and Media Center in the Arts and Humanities Library at Penn State's University Park campus, and to reclassify them from an accession number system to a more user-browsable one based on the Library of Congress Classification scheme. This article looks at the path that has being taken to reach this goal, and provides an initial assessment of the project at the halfway point.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1358788.
  
  Wissenschaftsfach: Musik
  Behandelte Form: Elektronische Datenträger ; Musik-Tonträger
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 8
  Bade, D.: Jakobsonian library science? A response to Jonathan Tuttle's article "The aphasia of modern subject access"..
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.4, S.428-438.
  
  Abstract: This article responds to Jonathan Tuttle's article "The Aphasia of Modern Subject Access" in which Roman Jakobson's semiology of "shared codes" consisting of preexisting signs is offered as the explanation for two redundant linguistic tools associated with cataloging: LCSH and LCC. The article criticizes Tuttle's terminology, his semiology, and his argument that selection and combination are both necessary for the operation of language but each are associated with only one of these tools.
  
  Anmerkung: Bezugnahme auf: Tuttle, J.: The aphasia of modern subject access. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.4, S.263-275. Erwiderung auf den Beitrag: Tuttle, J.: Jakobsonian library science? a response to David Bade. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.4, S.439-440.
  
  Objekt: LCC ; LCSH
  
  
• 9
  Adler, M.A.: Disciplining knowledge at the Library of Congress.
  In: Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.5, S.370-376.
  
  Abstract: The Library of Congress is a federal institution that occupies a critical space where medical, social science, political, literary, and other discourses are collected, arranged, and disseminated to Congress and the public. LC plays a vital part in discipline creation and maintenance, as it actively reproduces specific discourses, while silencing others, such as those from the humanities, social sciences, and the general public. Alternatively, social tagging seems to disregard conventions of disciplinarity and allows much more diversity of representations. Tagging may provide important insight for organizing materials in research libraries, as choices between single disciplines are no longer necessary and voices from various fields and audiences can name resources using their own terms, whether they prefer medical/technical jargon or everyday words. As the academy moves more toward interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary studies and aims to find the intersections across political, social, scientific, and cultural phenomena, the implications and effects of library organization based on classes and subjects needs to be interrogated.
  
  Inhalt: Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_i.pdf.
  
  Themenfeld: Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 10
  Higgins, C.: Library of Congress Classification : Teddy Roosevelt's world in numbers?.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.4, S.249-262.
  
  Abstract: This article identifies late nineteenth-century American preoccupations and prejudices within the Library of Congress classification scheme, suggesting that these ought to be of concern to the worldwide community of classifiers who now apply the scheme beyond its original context. The approach of the article is both historical and critical. It uses a number of examples to demonstrate how the ideological content of the classification scheme fails to adequately represent contemporary global realities, while recognizing, and applauding, its essential pragmatism.
  
  Themenfeld: International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 11
  Tuttle, J.: ¬The aphasia of modern subject access.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.4, S.263-275.
  
  Abstract: Why do catalogers use two systems, one notational like Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the other terminological like Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), to reach the same goal: subject description and access? This article, divided into two parts, first surveys the library science literature to address the unsatisfying answers given to that question and, secondly, provides a new answer based on the linguistic theory of Roman Jakobson. Jakobson's theory that language is always twofold, the act of selecting words paired with the act of combining words, is proposed as a theory of subject access, with LCSH doing the work of selection and LCC thework of combination.
  
  Anmerkung: Vgl. die Erwiderung: Bade, D.: Jakobsonian library science? A response to Jonathan Tuttle's article "The aphasia of modern subject access". In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.4, S.428-438 sowie darauf die Erwiderung: Tuttle, J.: Jakobsonian library science? a response to David Bade. In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.4, S.439-440.
  
  Objekt: LCC ; LCSH
  
  
• 12
  Zins, C. ; Santos, P.L.V.A.C.: Mapping the knowledge covered by library classification systems.
  In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.877-901.
  
  Abstract: This study explores, in 3 steps, how the 3 main library classification systems, the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Universal Decimal Classification, cover human knowledge. First, we mapped the knowledge covered by the 3 systems. We used the "10 Pillars of Knowledge: Map of Human Knowledge," which comprises 10 pillars, as an evaluative model. We mapped all the subject-based classes and subclasses that are part of the first 2 levels of the 3 hierarchical structures. Then, we zoomed into each of the 10 pillars and analyzed how the three systems cover the 10 knowledge domains. Finally, we focused on the 3 library systems. Based on the way each one of them covers the 10 knowledge domains, it is evident that they failed to adequately and systematically present contemporary human knowledge. They are unsystematic and biased, and, at the top 2 levels of the hierarchical structures, they are incomplete.
  
  Themenfeld: International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  Objekt: LCC ; DDC ; UDC
  
  
• 13
  Ferris, A.M.: Results of an expanded survey on the use of Classification Web : they will use it, if you buy it!.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 47(2009) no.5, S.427-451.
  
  Abstract: This paper presents the results of a survey examining the extent to which working catalogers use Classification Web, the Library of Congress' online resource for subject heading and classification documentation. An earlier survey analyzed Class Web's usefulness on an institutional level. This broader survey expands on that analysis and provides information on such questions as: what types of institutions subscribe to Class Web; what are the reasons for using Class Web when performing original or copy cataloging; and what other resources do catalogers use for classification/subject heading analysis?
  
  Themenfeld: Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  Objekt: LCC ; Classification Web
  Land/Ort: USA
  
  
• 14
  Bettella, C. ; Capodaglio, C. ; Ramous, C. ; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy).
  In: Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.130-140.
  
  Abstract: The ongoing project to revise the arrangement of the open shelves library collections occasioned a historiographic account of the implementation phases of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), subclasses B-BJ - Philosophy and Psychology, at the Library of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Padua (Italy). The schema was adopted as a collection shelving and location device since the Library institution in 1997. The LCC international acknowledgement and the neutral framework of the schema have undoubtedly played a role of driving factors at the first stage of the selection process. However, the implementation of the classification scheme had to consider critical issues like the shortage of the library area, the selection criteria of the appropriate bibliographic material, as well as the effort to settle and tailor the original schema to the specific needs of the library collections and its end-users. The purpose of this paper is twofold: from one hand, we aim to examine in detail each stage of the implementation project in order to provide a preliminary impact evaluation of the classification schema both on the collections management and development and on the research practices of the local users community; from the other, we intend to highlight the principal factors that have implied a sort of declassification process of the system itself. In conclusion, we argue that the declassification of library collections can be read, from a bottom-up perspective, as index of vitality of the collections themselves, as well as a valuable basis for planning the next steps of the Library project.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl. unter: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko36200923h.pdf.
  
  Anmerkung: Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
  
  Themenfeld: Bestandsaufstellung
  Wissenschaftsfach: Philosophie
  Objekt: LCC
  Land/Ort: I ; Padua
  
  
• 15
  Paolillo, J.C.: Linguistics and the information sciences.
  In: Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates. London : Taylor & Francis, 2009. S.3468-3478.
  
  Abstract: Linguistics is the scientific study of language which emphasizes language spoken in everyday settings by human beings. It has a long history of interdisciplinarity, both internally and in contribution to other fields, including information science. A linguistic perspective is beneficial in many ways in information science, since it examines the relationship between the forms of meaningful expressions and their social, cognitive, institutional, and communicative context, these being two perspectives on information that are actively studied, to different degrees, in information science. Examples of issues relevant to information science are presented for which the approach taken under a linguistic perspective is illustrated.
  
  Inhalt: Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044491. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  
  Themenfeld: Computerlinguistik
  Wissenschaftsfach: Sprachwissenschaft
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 16
  Chan, L.M. ; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC).
  In: Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates. London : Taylor & Francis, 2009. S.xx-xx.
  
  Abstract: The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
  
  Anmerkung: Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  
  Themenfeld: International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 17
  Smiraglia, R.P.: Shelflisting music : guidelines for use with the Library of Congress Classification: M.2nd ed.
  Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press /Music Library Association, 2008. x, 37 S.
  ISBN 978-0-8108-5418-5
  (MLA Technical Report; 30)
  
  Themenfeld: Bestandsaufstellung
  Wissenschaftsfach: Musik
  Objekt: LCC
  
  
• 18
  Christensen, B.: Minoritization vs. universalization : lesbianism and male homosexuality in LCSH and LCC.
  In: Knowledge organization. 35(2008) no.4, S.229-238.
  
  Abstract: In 1990 Ellen Greenblatt published a study of gay- and lesbian-related terms in the Library of Congress Subject Headings. No such study has been published since, nor has such a study been conducted on the Library of Congress Classification system. This article returns to Greenblatt's LCSH study to see what progress has been made in the last two decades, then uses her study as a template to examine gay- and lesbian-related terminology in LCC. Greenblatt's objections to then-current headings are examples of a tension defined in the research of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and later Grant Campbell: between a "universalizing view," which values unmarked representation of all parts of the population as a whole, and a "minoritizing view" like Greenblatt's, which values visibility for the minority "at any cost." Catalogers and classificationists should be aware of this tension and respectful of current preferred usage of the minority group being represented.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl. unter: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko3520084e.pdf.
  
  Objekt: LCSH ; LCC
  
  
• 19
  Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools.
  In: Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.2, S.29-43.
  
  Abstract: Canada has a long history of adapting United States subject access tools, including the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Sears List of Subject Headings, to meet the specific needs of Canadians. This paper addresses the extensions to these American tools for English-speaking Canadians. While the United States and Canada have many similarities, differences exist that require changing terminology and providing greater depth and precision in subject headings and classification for specifically Canadian topics. The major effort has been for Library and Archives Canada (LAC) systematically to provide extensions for LCC and LCSH for use within its cataloging records. This paper examines the history and philosophy of these Canadian efforts to provide enhanced subject access. Paradoxically, French-speaking Canadians may have found it easier to start from scratch with the Repertoire de vedettes-matiere because of the difficult decisions for English-language tools on how much change to implement in an environment where most Canadian libraries use the American subject access tools. Canadian studies scholars around the world can use Canadian records, especially those maintained by LAC, to obtain superior subject access for Canadian topics even if they obtain the documents from other sources.
  
  Objekt: LCC ; LCSH
  Land/Ort: CAN
  
  
• 20
  Jiang, S.Y.: Lost in translation : the treatment of Chinese classics in the Library of Congress Classification.
  In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 45(2007) no.1, S.3-14.
  
  Abstract: This paper describes the nature of the Chinese Classics and the inappropriateness of classifying the collection as literature within the Library of Congress Classification scheme. The practical and philosophical reasons for the inadequacy of Library of Congress Classification in comprehending and classifying the Chinese Classics are examined. A call is made to change the current treatment that classifies the Chinese Classics in "Class PL" (Literature) to "Class B" (Philosophy) along with modifications to relevant schedules and the addition of more sophisticated hierarchies and cross references for accuracy and consistency.
  
  Objekt: LCC