Literatur zur Informationserschließung

Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.

© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 28. April 2022)

Suchergebnisse

• 1
  Rentschler, C.: Indexing electronic journals.
  In: Serials librarian. 33(1998) nos.3/4, S.319-324.
  
  Abstract: The staff of 'Library Literature' has been indexing 3 electronic journals since 1995. Provides an overview of the process, including selection of titles, subscriptions, procedures and problems
  
  Anmerkung: Contribution to an issue devoted to e-serials: publishers, libraries, users, and standards, part 2
  
  Behandelte Form: Elektronische Dokumente
  Objekt: LiLi
  
  
• 2
  Hill, J.R.: Library Literature on CD-ROM.
  In: Managing information. 2(1995) no.9, S.55-56.
  
  Abstract: Reviews LiLi on CD-ROM focusing on software, hardware and content
  
  Themenfeld: Informationsmittel
  Objekt: LiLi
  
  
• 3
  Martin, L.M. ; Via, B.J.: Looking at the mirror : reflections on researching the recruitment of minority librarians to the profession in LISA and Library Literature on CD-ROM.
  In: Racial and ethnic diversity in academic libraries: multicultural issues: Ed.: D.A. Curry et al. New York : Haworth, 1994. S.253-278.
  (Reference librarian; nos.45/46)
  
  Objekt: LISA ; LiLi
  
  
• 4
  Reid, B.J.: Information and library literature on CD-ROM : a review article.
  In: Refer. 9(1993) no.3, S.7-8,10-13.
  
  Abstract: Compares the 3 mainstream CD-ROM bibliographic databases covering the literature of library and information science: LISA PLUS (the CD-ROM version of LISA); Library Literature (WilsonDisc) and Information Science Abstracts Plus (published by SilverPlatter and incorporating a subset of ERIC). Assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the 3 databases in terms of: scope and coverage, Currency; user interface and search facilities; and the individual features of each database. Concludes the LISA PLUS is the most useful in a UK context, because of its excellent, balanced, international coverage. However, some aspects of its subject indexing gave cause for concern (LiLi gave similar cause for concern) and its user interface was judged not to be very user friedly. Nevertheless, where topics move from the periphery of the centre of the LIS field, LISA accurately reflects this. LISA's coverage of the literature of CD-ROM applications in the LIS environment is unmatched. ISA Plus has a very friedly user interface, but virtually uncontrolled terms and can only be regarded as a complementary source because of its US emphasis, though it is an important back up source for any topic in the information technology and computing areas. Lack of currency was a concern for users of all 3 services
  
  Objekt: LISA ; LiLi ; ISA
  
  
• 5
  Chu, C.M. ; Ajiferuke, I.: Quality of indexing in library and information science databases.
  In: Online review. 13(1989), S.11-35.
  
  Abstract: This study compares the quality of indexing in library and information science databases (Library Literature (LL), Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA), and Information Science Abstracts (ISA)). An alternative method to traditional retrieval effectiveness tests, suggested by White and Griffith in their paper 'Quality of indexing in online databases' is adopted to measure the quality of the controlled vocabulary of each database ... Our analysis shows that LISA has the best quality of indexing out of the three databases
  
  Objekt: LISA ; LiLi ; ISA
  
  
• 6
  Ernest, D.J. ; Lange, H.R. ; Herring, D.: ¬An online comparison of three library science databases.
  In: RQ. 28(1988) no.2, S.185-194.
  
  Themenfeld: Bibliographie
  Objekt: LISA ; ERIC ; LiLi