Literatur zur Informationserschließung

Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.

© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 28. April 2022)

Suchergebnisse

• 1
  Menkov, V. ; Ginsparg, P. ; Kantor, P.B.: Recommendations and privacy in the arXiv system : a simulation experiment using historical data.
  In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.3, S.300-313.
  
  Abstract: Recommender systems may accelerate knowledge discovery in many fields. However, their users may be competitors guarding their ideas before publication or for other reasons. We describe a simulation experiment to assess user privacy against targeted attacks, modeling recommendations based on co-access data. The analysis uses an unusually long (14?years) set of anonymized historical data on user-item accesses. We introduce the notions of "visibility" and "discoverability." We find, based on historical data, that the majority of the actions of arXiv users would be potentially "visible" under targeted attack. However, "discoverability," which incorporates the difficulty of actually seeing a "visible" effect, is very much lower for nearly all users. We consider the effect of changes to the settings of the recommender algorithm on the visibility and discoverability of user actions and propose mitigation strategies that reduce both measures of risk.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24236.
  
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 2
  Kim, L. ; Portenoy, J.H. ; West, J.D. ; Stovel, K.W.: Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives.
  In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.10, S.1218-1226.
  
  Abstract: Journals play a critical role in the scientific process because they evaluate the quality of incoming papers and offer an organizing filter for search. However, the role of journals has been called into question because new preprint archives and academic search engines make it easier to find articles independent of the journals that publish them. Research on this issue is complicated by the deeply confounded relationship between article quality and journal reputation. We present an innovative proxy for individual article quality that is divorced from the journal's reputation or impact factor: the number of citations to preprints posted on arXiv.org. Using this measure to study three subfields of physics that were early adopters of arXiv, we show that prior estimates of the effect of journal reputation on an individual article's impact (measured by citations) are likely inflated. While we find that higher-quality preprints in these subfields are now less likely to be published in journals compared to prior years, we find little systematic evidence that the role of journal reputation on article performance has declined.
  
  Inhalt: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24326.
  
  Themenfeld: Elektronisches Publizieren
  Wissenschaftsfach: Kommunikationswissenschaften ; Physik
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 3
  Collins, H.M. ; Reyes-Galindo, L. ; Ginsparg, P.: ¬A note concerning primary source knowledge.
  In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1105-1110.
  
  Abstract: We present the results of running 4 different papers through the automated filtering system used by the open access preprint server "arXiv" to classify papers and implement quality control barriers. The exercise was carried out in order to assess whether these highly sophisticated, state-of-the-art filters can distinguish between papers that are controversial or have gone past their "sell-by date," and otherwise normal papers. We conclude that not even the arXiv filters, which are otherwise successful in filtering fringe-topic papers, can fully acquire "Domain-Specific Discrimination" and thus distinguish technical papers that are taken seriously by an expert community from those that are not. Finally, we discuss the implications this has for citizen and policy-maker engagement with the Primary Source Knowledge of a technical domain.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23753/full.
  
  Themenfeld: Elektronisches Publizieren
  Objekt: ArXiv
  
  
• 4
  Li, X. ; Thelwall, M. ; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication.
  In: Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635.
  
  Abstract: Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
  
  Inhalt: Vgl.: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/AJIM-03-2015-0049.
  
  Themenfeld: Elektronisches Publizieren
  Objekt: arXiv ; Research Papers in Economics ; Social Science Research Network ; PubMed Central
  
  
• 5
  Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt.
  In: Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2015, H.1, S.10-11.
  
  Abstract: Bericht zum millionsten Mathematik-Artikel im Preprint-Archiv arXiv.
  
  Themenfeld: Elektronisches Publizieren
  Wissenschaftsfach: Mathematik
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 6
  Larivière, V. ; Sugimoto, C.R. ; Macaluso, B. ; Milojevi´c, S. ; Cronin, B. ; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships.
  In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1157-1169.
  
  Abstract: Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
  
  Themenfeld: Informetrie ; Bibliographie
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 7
  Haque, A.-ul ; Ginsparg, P.: Last but not least : additional positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv.
  In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2381-2388.
  
  Abstract: We continue investigation of the effect of position in announcements of newly received articles, a single day artifact, with citations received over the course of ensuing years. Earlier work focused on the "visibility" effect for positions near the beginnings of announcements, and on the "self-promotion" effect associated with authors intentionally aiming for these positions, with both found correlated to a later enhanced citation rate. Here we consider a "reverse-visibility" effect for positions near the ends of announcements, and on a "procrastination" effect associated with submissions made within the 20 minute period just before the daily deadline. For two large subcommunities of theoretical high-energy physics, we find a clear "reverse-visibility" effect, in which articles near the ends of the lists receive a boost in both short-term readership and long-term citations, almost comparable in size to the "visibility" effect documented earlier. For one of those subcommunities, we find an additional "procrastination" effect, in which last position articles submitted shortly before the deadline have an even higher citation rate than those that land more accidentally in that position. We consider and eliminate geographic effects as responsible for the above, and speculate on other possible causes, including "oblivious" and "nightowl" effects.
  
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 8
  Haque, A.-u. ; Ginsparg, P.: Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv.
  In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2203-2218.
  
  Abstract: arXiv.org mediates contact with the literature for entire scholarly communities, providing both archival access and daily email and web announcements of new materials. We confirm and extend a surprising correlation between article position in these initial announcements and later citation impact, due primarily to intentional self-promotion by authors. There is, however, also a pure visibility effect: the subset of articles accidentally in early positions fared measurably better in the long-term citation record. Articles in astrophysics (astro-ph) and two large subcommunities of theoretical high energy physics (hep-th and hep-ph) announced in position 1, for example, respectively received median numbers of citations 83%, 50%, and 100% higher than those lower down, while the subsets there accidentally had 44%, 38%, and 71% visibility boosts. We also consider the positional effects on early readership. The median numbers of early full text downloads for astro-ph, hep-th, and hep-ph articles announced in position 1 were 82%, 61%, and 58% higher than for lower positions, respectively, and those there accidentally had medians visibility-boosted by 53%, 44%, and 46%. Finally, we correlate a variety of readership features with long-term citations, using machine learning methods, and conclude with some observations on impact metrics and the dangers of recommender mechanisms.
  
  Themenfeld: Informetrie
  Objekt: arXiv
  
  
• 9
  Moed, H.F.: ¬The effect of "open access" on citation impact : an analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section.
  In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2047-2054.
  
  Abstract: This article statistically analyzes how the citation impact of articles deposited in the Condensed Matter section of the preprint server ArXiv (hosted by Cornell University), and subsequently published in a scientific journal, compares to that of articles in the same journal that were not deposited in the archive. Its principal aim is to further illustrate and roughly estimate the effect of two factors, early view and quality bias, on differences in citation impact between these two sets of papers, using citation data from Thomson Scientific's Web of Science. It presents estimates for a number of journals in the field of condensed matter physics. To discriminate between an open access effect and an early view effect, longitudinal citation data were analyzed covering a time period as long as 7 years. Quality bias was measured by calculating ArXiv citation impact differentials at the level of individual authors publishing in a journal, taking into account coauthorship. The analysis provided evidence of a strong quality bias and early view effect. Correcting for these effects, there is in a sample of six condensed matter physics journals studied in detail no sign of a general open access advantage of papers deposited in ArXiv. The study does provide evidence that ArXiv accelerates citation due to the fact that ArXiv makes papers available earlier rather than makes them freely available.
  
  Themenfeld: Elektronisches Publizieren ; Informetrie
  Wissenschaftsfach: Physik
  Objekt: ArXiv