Literatur zur Informationserschließung

Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.

© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 04. Juni 2021)

Suchergebnisse

• 1
  Gingras, Y.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses.
  Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2016. xii, 119 S.
  ISBN 978-0-262-03512-5
  (History and foundations of information science)
  
  Abstract: The research evaluation market is booming. "Ranking," "metrics," "h-index," and "impact factors" are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything -- teachers, professors, training programs, universities -- using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure "research excellence," bibliometrics -- aggregate data on publications and citations -- has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an "objective" measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than "subjective" and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to. Although the study of publication and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their research strategy.
  
  Inhalt: The origins of bibliometrics -- What bibliometrics teach us about the dynamics of scienceThe proliferation of research evaluation -- The evaluation of research evaluation -- Conclusion: the universities' new clothes?
  
  Anmerkung: Rez. in: JASIST 68(2017) no.9, S.2290-2292 (Judit Bar-Ilan). Originaltitel: Dérives de l'évaluation de la recherche.
  
  Themenfeld: Informetrie
  
  LCSH: Bibliometrics ; Research / Evaluation ; Education, Higher / Research / Evaluation ; Universities and colleges / Research / Evaluation
  RSWK: Bibliometrie / Missbrauch / Forschung / Erfolgskontrolle
  BK: 02.13 (Wissenschaftspraxis) Subject | Subject | ; 81.80 (Hochschulen / Fachhochschulen) ; 83.31 (Wirtschaftswachstum)
  DDC: 020.727 / dc23
  LCC: Q180.55.E9
  RVK: AK 28100 ; AN 96300 ; AN 96800 ; QB 100
  
• 2
  Daniel, H.-D.: Guardians of science : fairness and reliabiblity of peer review.Translated by William E. Russey.
  Weinheim : VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993. xiv, 118 S.
  ISBN 3-527-29041-9
  
  Abstract: The book evaluates the peer reviews presented to the Editorial Office of the journal Angewandte Chemie for all contributions submitted for publication in 1984. The peer review system, since its inception in the 17th century, helps to improve the quality of published papers. The book has 10 chapters, dealing with the peer review as an instrument for the self-regulation of science, as a target for criticism, it deals with the journal Angewandte Chemie, the communications received in 1984, the internal and external evaluations and editorial decisions, the reviewers and the reviews, the reliability of manuscript refereeing, the fairness in manuscript evaluation, the validity of manuscript review and makes suggestions for a reform of the peer-review process
  
  Anmerkung: Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.2, S.108 (H. Borko)
  
  Wissenschaftsfach: Chemie
  
  LCSH: Research / Evaluation / Analysis ; Peer review / Analysis ; Technical writing / Evaluation / Analysis
  RSWK: Angewandte Chemie / Zeitschriftenaufsatz / Qualität / Gutachten ; Wissenschaftliches Manuskript / Bewertung (BVB) ; Chemie / Zeitschriftenaufsatz / Bewertung (BVB)
  BK: 81.20 / Bildungssoziologie: Allgemeines ; 02.20 / Wissenschaftsinformation ; 30.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen ; 30.03 / Methoden und Techniken in den Naturwissenschaften
  DDC: 507/.2 / dc20 ; 502.3
  GHBS: ANC (GE)
  LCC: Q180.55.E9D36 1993
  RVK: VB 4400 Chemie und Pharmazie / Bibliographien und Nachschlagewerke, Geschichte und Didaktik der Chemie und Pharmazie, Betriebssicherheit / Richtlinien für die Abfassung und Drucklegung chemischer Literatur Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten; Kongreßplanung Englisch für Chemiker u.ä. / Allgemeines ; CM 2200 Psychologie / Allgemeines. Geschichte und Methodik / Methodik und Wissenschaftstheorie der Psychologie