Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bar-Ilan, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Bar-Ilan, J.: On the overlap, the precision and estimated recall of search engines : a case study of the query 'Erdös' (1998) 0.02
    0.018277941 = product of:
      0.06397279 = sum of:
        0.038226083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038226083 = score(doc=3753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
        0.025746709 = weight(_text_:internet in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025746709 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the retrieval capabilities of 6 Internet search engines on a simple query. Existing work on search engine evaluation considers only the first 10 or 20 results returned by the search engine. In this work, all documents that the search engine pointed at were retrieved and thoroughly examined. Thus the precision of the whole retrieval process could be calculated, the overlap between the results of the engines studied, and an estimate on the recall of the searches given. The precision of the engines is high, recall is very low and the overlap is minimal
  2. Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007) 0.00
    0.003900621 = product of:
      0.027304346 = sum of:
        0.027304346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027304346 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03819578 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Children are increasingly using the Web. Cognitive theory tells us that directory structures are especially suited for information retrieval by children; however, empirical results show that they prefer keyword searching. One of the reasons for these findings could be that the directory structures and terminology are created by grown-ups. Using a card-sorting method and an enveloping system, we simulated the structure of a directory. Our goal was to try to understand what browsable, hierarchical subject categories children create when suggested terms are supplied and they are free to add or delete terms. Twelve groups of four children each (fourth and fifth graders) participated in our exploratory study. The initial terminology presented to the children was based on names of categories used in popular directories, in the sections on Arts, Television, Music, Cinema, and Celebrities. The children were allowed to introduce additional cards and change the terms appearing on the 61 cards. Findings show that the different groups reached reasonable consensus; the majority of the category names used by existing directories were acceptable by them and only a small minority of the terms caused confusion. Our recommendation is to include children in the design process of directories, not only in designing the interface but also in designing the content structure as well.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Bar-Ilan, J.: Methods for measuring search engine performance over time (2002) 0.00
    0.0019893246 = product of:
      0.013925271 = sum of:
        0.013925271 = product of:
          0.04177581 = sum of:
            0.04177581 = weight(_text_:29 in 305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04177581 = score(doc=305,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03819578 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 305, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=305)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2002 9:50:29
  4. Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The use of Web search engines in information science research (2003) 0.00
    0.0014919934 = product of:
      0.010443954 = sum of:
        0.010443954 = product of:
          0.03133186 = sum of:
            0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03133186 = score(doc=4271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03819578 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:16
  5. Bar-Ilan, J.: Comparing rankings of search results on the Web (2005) 0.00
    0.0012433277 = product of:
      0.008703294 = sum of:
        0.008703294 = product of:
          0.026109882 = sum of:
            0.026109882 = weight(_text_:29 in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026109882 = score(doc=1068,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03819578 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:29:21
  6. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Analysis of change in users' assessment of search results over time (2017) 0.00
    0.0012433277 = product of:
      0.008703294 = sum of:
        0.008703294 = product of:
          0.026109882 = sum of:
            0.026109882 = weight(_text_:29 in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026109882 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03819578 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:33:29