Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  1. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.03
    0.03155854 = product of:
      0.06311708 = sum of:
        0.06311708 = sum of:
          0.0055493023 = weight(_text_:s in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0055493023 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.05756778 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05756778 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15030256 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1033-1045
  2. Bates, M.J.: Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students (1996) 0.03
    0.02550315 = product of:
      0.0510063 = sum of:
        0.0510063 = sum of:
          0.004484513 = weight(_text_:s in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004484513 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
          0.046521787 = weight(_text_:22 in 7181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046521787 = score(doc=7181,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15030256 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7181, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 4.1997 20:22:55
    Source
    Library trends. 45(1996) no.2, S.155-164
  3. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.02
    0.019127363 = product of:
      0.038254727 = sum of:
        0.038254727 = sum of:
          0.0033633846 = weight(_text_:s in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0033633846 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.03489134 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03489134 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15030256 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Pages
    S.137-150
  4. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.02
    0.015939469 = product of:
      0.031878937 = sum of:
        0.031878937 = sum of:
          0.0028028206 = weight(_text_:s in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0028028206 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.029076118 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029076118 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15030256 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1590-1607
  5. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.01
    0.013460097 = sum of:
      0.0114981225 = product of:
        0.06898873 = sum of:
          0.06898873 = weight(_text_:authors in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06898873 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19566955 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.0019619744 = product of:
        0.003923949 = sum of:
          0.003923949 = weight(_text_:s in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003923949 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
    Content
    Bezug (Letter to the editor) zu: McKay, D., Chang, S.,, Smith, W., Buchanan, G.: The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2019).
  6. Bates, M.J.: Information (2009) 0.01
    0.011537226 = sum of:
      0.009855534 = product of:
        0.0591332 = sum of:
          0.0591332 = weight(_text_:authors in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0591332 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19566955 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.0016816923 = product of:
        0.0033633846 = sum of:
          0.0033633846 = weight(_text_:s in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0033633846 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042921152 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A selection of representative definitions of information is drawn from information science and related disciplines, and discussed and compared. Defining information remains such a contested project that any claim to present a unified, singular vision of the topic would be disingenuous. Seven categories of definitions are described: Communicatory or semiotic; activity-based (i.e., information as event); propositional; structural; social; multitype; and deconstructionist. The impact of Norbert Wiener and Claude Shannon is discussed, as well as the widespread influence of Karl Popper's ideas. The data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) continuum is also addressed. Work of these authors is reviewed: Marcia J. Bates, Gregory Bateson, B.C. Brookes, Michael Buckland, Ian Cornelius, Ronald Day, Richard Derr, Brenda Dervin, Fred Dretske, Jason Farradane, Christopher Fox, Bernd Frohmann, Jonathan Furner, J.A. Goguen, Robert Losee, A.D. Madden, D.M. McKay, Doede Nauta, A.D. Pratt, Frederick Thompson.
    Pages
    S.2347-2360
  7. White, H.D.; Bates, M.J.; Wilson, P.: For information specialists : interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (1992) 0.00
    0.002912777 = product of:
      0.005825554 = sum of:
        0.005825554 = product of:
          0.011651108 = sum of:
            0.011651108 = weight(_text_:s in 7742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011651108 = score(doc=7742,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.24967289 = fieldWeight in 7742, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.1, S.58-59. (G. Matthews); Journal of academic librarianship 20(1994) no.1, S.34 (G.D. Barber)
    Pages
    V,310 S
  8. Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 33(1989), S.400-412
  9. Bates, M.J.: Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? (1990) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=155)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.575-591
  10. Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.367-375
  11. Bates, M.J.: Factors affecting subject catalog search success (1977) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.161-169
  12. Bates, M.J.: How to use information search tactics online (1987) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 11(1987), S.47-54
  13. Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981) 0.00
    0.0022422564 = product of:
      0.004484513 = sum of:
        0.004484513 = product of:
          0.008969026 = sum of:
            0.008969026 = weight(_text_:s in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008969026 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.139-170
  14. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.00
    0.0019619744 = product of:
      0.003923949 = sum of:
        0.003923949 = product of:
          0.007847898 = sum of:
            0.007847898 = weight(_text_:s in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007847898 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367
  15. Bates, M.J.: ¬The design of browsing and berrypicking : techniques for the online search interface (1989) 0.00
    0.0019619744 = product of:
      0.003923949 = sum of:
        0.003923949 = product of:
          0.007847898 = sum of:
            0.007847898 = weight(_text_:s in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007847898 = score(doc=2228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online review. 13(1989) no.5, S.407-424
  16. Bates, M.J.: ¬An explanatory paradigm for online information retrieval (1986) 0.00
    0.0016816923 = product of:
      0.0033633846 = sum of:
        0.0033633846 = product of:
          0.0067267693 = sum of:
            0.0067267693 = weight(_text_:s in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067267693 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.91-99
  17. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2020) 0.00
    0.0016816923 = product of:
      0.0033633846 = sum of:
        0.0033633846 = product of:
          0.0067267693 = sum of:
            0.0067267693 = weight(_text_:s in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067267693 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.616
  18. Bates, M.J.: ¬A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS (1999) 0.00
    0.0014014103 = product of:
      0.0028028206 = sum of:
        0.0028028206 = product of:
          0.0056056413 = sum of:
            0.0056056413 = weight(_text_:s in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0056056413 = score(doc=4316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.11, S.975-993
  19. Bates, M.J.: ¬The invisible substrate of information science (1999) 0.00
    0.0014014103 = product of:
      0.0028028206 = sum of:
        0.0028028206 = product of:
          0.0056056413 = sum of:
            0.0056056413 = weight(_text_:s in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0056056413 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1043-1050
  20. Bates, M.J.: Hjoerland's critique of Bates' work on defining information (2008) 0.00
    0.0014014103 = product of:
      0.0028028206 = sum of:
        0.0028028206 = product of:
          0.0056056413 = sum of:
            0.0056056413 = weight(_text_:s in 4773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0056056413 = score(doc=4773,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.04666549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042921152 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4773, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B.: Information: Objective or subjective/situational? In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2007) no.10, S.1448-1456. - Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643. Vgl. auch: Bates, M.J.: Birger Hjørland's Manichean misconstruction of Marcia Bates' work. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.2038-2044.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.5, S.842-844