Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bodoff, D."
  1. Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020) 0.04 
    0.040423978 = sum of:
  0.038413037 = product of:
    0.15365215 = sum of:
      0.15365215 = weight(_text_:author's in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15365215 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3449079 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05132441 = queryNorm
          0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.00201094 = product of:
    0.00402188 = sum of:
      0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00402188 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05132441 = queryNorm
          0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.450-461
  2. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.02 
    0.019060155 = product of:
  0.03812031 = sum of:
    0.03812031 = sum of:
      0.003351567 = weight(_text_:s in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003351567 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05132441 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.034768745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034768745 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17972933 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05132441 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.289-304
  3. Bodoff, D.; Robertson, S.: ¬A new unified probabilistic model (2004) 0.00 
    0.0017415255 = product of:
  0.003483051 = sum of:
    0.003483051 = product of:
      0.006966102 = sum of:
        0.006966102 = weight(_text_:s in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006966102 = score(doc=2129,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.124836445 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a new unified probabilistic model. Two previous models, Robertson et al.'s "Model 0" and "Model 3," each have strengths and weaknesses. The strength of Model 0 not found in Model 3, is that it does not require relevance data about the particular document or query, and, related to that, its probability estimates are straightforward. The strength of Model 3 not found in Model 0 is that it can utilize feedback information about the particular document and query in question. In this paper we introduce a new unified probabilistic model that combines these strengths: the expression of its probabilities is straightforward, it does not require that data must be available for the particular document or query in question, but it can utilize such specific data if it is available. The model is one way to resolve the difficulty of combining two marginal views in probabilistic retrieval.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.471-487
  4. Bodoff, D.; Wong, S.P.-S.: Documents and queries as random variables : history and implications (2006) 0.00 
    0.0014219495 = product of:
  0.002843899 = sum of:
    0.002843899 = product of:
      0.005687798 = sum of:
        0.005687798 = weight(_text_:s in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005687798 = score(doc=193,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1138-1154
  5. Bodoff, D.: ¬A re-unification of two competing models for document retrieval (1999) 0.00 
    0.0011730484 = product of:
  0.0023460968 = sum of:
    0.0023460968 = product of:
      0.0046921936 = sum of:
        0.0046921936 = weight(_text_:s in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046921936 = score(doc=2951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.1, S.49-64
  6. Bodoff, D.; Wu, B.; Wong, K.Y.M.: Relevance data for language models using maximum likelihood (2003) 0.00 
    0.0011730484 = product of:
  0.0023460968 = sum of:
    0.0023460968 = product of:
      0.0046921936 = sum of:
        0.0046921936 = weight(_text_:s in 1822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046921936 = score(doc=1822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.11, S.1050-1061
  7. Bodoff, D.: Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching (2006) 0.00 
    0.0011730484 = product of:
  0.0023460968 = sum of:
    0.0023460968 = product of:
      0.0046921936 = sum of:
        0.0046921936 = weight(_text_:s in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046921936 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.1, S.69-86
  8. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00 
    0.00100547 = product of:
  0.00201094 = sum of:
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00402188 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1254-1269
  9. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998) 0.00 
    0.00100547 = product of:
  0.00201094 = sum of:
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00402188 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1270-1282
  10. Bodoff, D.; Enache, D.; Kambil, A.; Simon, G.; Yukhimets, A.: ¬A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    0.00100547 = product of:
  0.00201094 = sum of:
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00402188 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.10, S.785-796
  11. Bodoff, D.: Emergence of terminological conventions as a searcher-indexer coordination game (2009) 0.00 
    0.00100547 = product of:
  0.00201094 = sum of:
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00402188 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2509-2529
  12. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: User models as revealed in web-based research services (2012) 0.00 
    0.00100547 = product of:
  0.00201094 = sum of:
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = weight(_text_:s in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00402188 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.584-599
  13. Bodoff, D.: Test theory for evaluating reliability of IR test collections (2008) 0.00 
    8.3789177E-4 = product of:
  0.0016757835 = sum of:
    0.0016757835 = product of:
      0.003351567 = sum of:
        0.003351567 = weight(_text_:s in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003351567 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05132441 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1117-1145

Authors

Years

Themes