Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bodoff, D."
  1. Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020) 0.02
    0.018887673 = product of:
      0.037775345 = sum of:
        0.037775345 = product of:
          0.15110138 = sum of:
            0.15110138 = weight(_text_:author's in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15110138 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33918214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05047238 = queryNorm
                0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
  2. Bodoff, D.; Enache, D.; Kambil, A.; Simon, G.; Yukhimets, A.: ¬A unified maximum likelihood approach to document retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.011800191 = product of:
      0.023600383 = sum of:
        0.023600383 = product of:
          0.047200765 = sum of:
            0.047200765 = weight(_text_:g in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047200765 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1895716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05047238 = queryNorm
                0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.01
    0.008547888 = product of:
      0.017095776 = sum of:
        0.017095776 = product of:
          0.034191553 = sum of:
            0.034191553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034191553 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17674567 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05047238 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25