Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Borgman, C.L."
  1. Borgman, C.L.: Individual differences in the use of technology : work in progress (1985) 0.04
    0.03673477 = product of:
      0.07346954 = sum of:
        0.07346954 = product of:
          0.14693908 = sum of:
            0.14693908 = weight(_text_:work in 6894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14693908 = score(doc=6894,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.6488395 = fieldWeight in 6894, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6894)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Pepe, A.; Mayernik, M.; Borgman, C.L.; Van de Sompel, H.: From artifacts to aggregations : modeling scientific life cycles on the semantic Web (2010) 0.02
    0.022695763 = product of:
      0.045391526 = sum of:
        0.045391526 = product of:
          0.13617457 = sum of:
            0.13617457 = weight(_text_:objects in 3425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13617457 = score(doc=3425,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3279419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 3425, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3425)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the process of scientific research, many information objects are generated, all of which may remain valuable indefinitely. However, artifacts such as instrument data and associated calibration information may have little value in isolation; their meaning is derived from their relationships to each other. Individual artifacts are best represented as components of a life cycle that is specific to a scientific research domain or project. Current cataloging practices do not describe objects at a sufficient level of granularity nor do they offer the globally persistent identifiers necessary to discover and manage scholarly products with World Wide Web standards. The Open Archives Initiative's Object Reuse and Exchange data model (OAI-ORE) meets these requirements. We demonstrate a conceptual implementation of OAI-ORE to represent the scientific life cycles of embedded networked sensor applications in seismology and environmental sciences. By establishing relationships between publications, data, and contextual research information, we illustrate how to obtain a richer and more realistic view of scientific practices. That view can facilitate new forms of scientific research and learning. Our analysis is framed by studies of scientific practices in a large, multidisciplinary, multi-university science and engineering research center, the Center for Embedded Networked Sensing.
  3. Borgman, C.L.; Chignell, M.H.; Valdez, F.: Designing an information retrieval interface based on children's categorization of knowledge : a pilot study (1989) 0.02
    0.016071463 = product of:
      0.032142926 = sum of:
        0.032142926 = product of:
          0.06428585 = sum of:
            0.06428585 = weight(_text_:work in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06428585 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.28386727 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study assessed the ability of children to categorise concepts that will be used to organise an information retrieval interface. The work was done of Project SEED (Science for Early Educational Development), a project to develop hands-on science programmes for elementary schools. Aims to tailor an interface to the particular skills of children in organising science knowledge. The results are promising for the design of IR interfaces based on children's abilities to manipulate information.
  4. Meadow, C.T.; Cerny, B.A.; Borgman, C.L.; Case, D.O.: Online access to knowledge : system design (1989) 0.01
    0.01377554 = product of:
      0.02755108 = sum of:
        0.02755108 = product of:
          0.05510216 = sum of:
            0.05510216 = weight(_text_:work in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05510216 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22646447 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The project online access to knowledge (OAK) has developed a computer intermediary for delected users of the Department of Energy's DOE/RECON and BASIS online information retrieval systems. Its purpose is to enable people who have little or no training or experience in bibliographic searching to conduct their own searches, without the assistance of a trained librarian. hence permitting the user to work in both a place and time of his or her choosing. The purpose of this article is to report on the design and the rationale for the design. OAK software consists of both a tutorial and an assistance program. The latter does not employ a command language, hence obviates the need for a searcher to learn the formal language usually associated with an online database search service. It is central to our approach that this system does not supplant the user's ultimate primacy in knowing what he or she is looking for, nor in judging the results
  5. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.01
    0.012838662 = product of:
      0.025677323 = sum of:
        0.025677323 = product of:
          0.07703197 = sum of:
            0.07703197 = weight(_text_:objects in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07703197 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3279419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
  6. Borgman, C.L.: Will the global information infrastructure be the library of the future? : Central and Eastern Europe as a case example (1996) 0.01
    0.012539324 = product of:
      0.025078649 = sum of:
        0.025078649 = product of:
          0.050157297 = sum of:
            0.050157297 = weight(_text_:22 in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050157297 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.2, S.121-127
  7. Borgman, C.L.: ¬The conundrum of sharing research data (2012) 0.01
    0.010449437 = product of:
      0.020898875 = sum of:
        0.020898875 = product of:
          0.04179775 = sum of:
            0.04179775 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04179775 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 6.2012 15:22:29
  8. Borgman, C.L.; Scharnhorst, A.; Golshan, M.S.: Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures : mediating data sharing and reuse (2019) 0.01
    0.010449437 = product of:
      0.020898875 = sum of:
        0.020898875 = product of:
          0.04179775 = sum of:
            0.04179775 = weight(_text_:22 in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04179775 = score(doc=5325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 7.2019 11:58:22
  9. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.01
    0.00835955 = product of:
      0.0167191 = sum of:
        0.0167191 = product of:
          0.0334382 = sum of:
            0.0334382 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0334382 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21606421 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.061700378 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22