-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009)
0.02
0.018051434 = sum of:
0.014371684 = product of:
0.100601785 = sum of:
0.100601785 = weight(_text_:z in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100601785 = score(doc=2954,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19699143 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.51069117 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In a recently published PNAS paper, Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano (2008) propose the relative indicator cf as an unbiased indicator for citation performance across disciplines (fields, subject areas). To calculate cf, the citation rate for a single paper is divided by the average number of citations for all papers in the discipline in which the single paper has been categorized. cf values are said to lead to a universality of discipline-specific citation distributions. Using a comprehensive dataset of an evaluation study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC-IE), we tested the advantage of using this indicator in practical application at the micro level, as compared with (1) simple citation rates, and (2) z-scores, which have been used in psychological testing for many years for normalization of test scores. To calculate z-scores, the mean number of citations of the papers within a discipline is subtracted from the citation rate of a single paper, and the difference is then divided by the citations' standard deviation for a discipline. Our results indicate that z-scores are better suited than cf values to produce universality of discipline-specific citation distributions.
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.00
0.002575825 = product of:
0.00515165 = sum of:
0.00515165 = product of:
0.0103033 = sum of:
0.0103033 = weight(_text_:d in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0103033 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.00
0.001839875 = product of:
0.00367975 = sum of:
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? : a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)
0.00
0.001839875 = product of:
0.00367975 = sum of:
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.00
0.001839875 = product of:
0.00367975 = sum of:
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings : the Leiden ranking 2011/2012 (2013)
0.00
0.001839875 = product of:
0.00367975 = sum of:
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mutz, R.; Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions : a multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund (2015)
0.00
0.001839875 = product of:
0.00367975 = sum of:
0.00367975 = product of:
0.0073595 = sum of:
0.0073595 = weight(_text_:d in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073595 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
0.00
0.0014719 = product of:
0.0029438 = sum of:
0.0029438 = product of:
0.0058876 = sum of:
0.0058876 = weight(_text_:d in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058876 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07012114 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03690835 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
