Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Bornmann, L."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.03
    0.027266314 = product of:
      0.05453263 = sum of:
        0.05453263 = product of:
          0.08179894 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
            0.07460712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07460712 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.03
    0.025939818 = product of:
      0.051879637 = sum of:
        0.051879637 = sum of:
          0.010980166 = weight(_text_:d in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010980166 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0035959128 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03730356 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045888513 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.2, S.198-201
  3. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.02
    0.018177543 = product of:
      0.036355086 = sum of:
        0.036355086 = product of:
          0.05453263 = sum of:
            0.0047945506 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047945506 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
            0.04973808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04973808 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
  4. Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013) 0.01
    0.013633157 = product of:
      0.027266314 = sum of:
        0.027266314 = product of:
          0.04089947 = sum of:
            0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035959128 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
            0.03730356 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03730356 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:44:17
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.587-595
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01
    0.011360965 = product of:
      0.02272193 = sum of:
        0.02272193 = product of:
          0.034082893 = sum of:
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
            0.0310863 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0310863 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16069375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.217-229
  6. Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013) 0.01
    0.006374738 = product of:
      0.012749476 = sum of:
        0.012749476 = product of:
          0.019124214 = sum of:
            0.015528301 = weight(_text_:d in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015528301 = score(doc=928,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
            0.0035959128 = weight(_text_:s in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0035959128 = score(doc=928,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
    Language
    d
    Pages
    S.350-356
  7. Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011) 0.00
    0.004048911 = product of:
      0.008097822 = sum of:
        0.008097822 = product of:
          0.012146732 = sum of:
            0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009150138 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.61-71
  8. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings : the Leiden ranking 2011/2012 (2013) 0.00
    0.004048911 = product of:
      0.008097822 = sum of:
        0.008097822 = product of:
          0.012146732 = sum of:
            0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009150138 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1649-1658
  9. Mutz, R.; Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions : a multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund (2015) 0.00
    0.004048911 = product of:
      0.008097822 = sum of:
        0.008097822 = product of:
          0.012146732 = sum of:
            0.009150138 = weight(_text_:d in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009150138 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0871823 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
            0.0029965942 = weight(_text_:s in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029965942 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2321-2339
  10. Bornmann, L.: Nature's top 100 revisited (2015) 0.00
    0.0014126081 = product of:
      0.0028252162 = sum of:
        0.0028252162 = product of:
          0.008475648 = sum of:
            0.008475648 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008475648 = score(doc=2351,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bezug: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2714. Vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23554/abstract.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.2166
  11. Collins, H.; Bornmann, L.: On scientific misconduct (2014) 0.00
    0.0013984106 = product of:
      0.0027968213 = sum of:
        0.0027968213 = product of:
          0.008390464 = sum of:
            0.008390464 = weight(_text_:s in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008390464 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.1089-1090
  12. Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011) 0.00
    0.0013984106 = product of:
      0.0027968213 = sum of:
        0.0027968213 = product of:
          0.008390464 = sum of:
            0.008390464 = weight(_text_:s in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008390464 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.197-245
  13. Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Statistical tests and research assessments : a comment on Schneider (2012) (2013) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1306-1308
  14. Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.428-429
  15. Bornmann, L.: Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2014) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.647-648
  16. Bornmann, L.: ¬The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science (2014) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 1509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=1509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1509)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2160-2161
  17. Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.; Haunschild, R.: Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 2349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=2349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2349)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2715-2716
  18. Bornmann, L.: What do altmetrics counts mean? : a plea for content analyses (2016) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.1016-1017
  19. Besselaar, P. van den; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Correct assumptions? (2016) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1779
  20. Leydesdorff, L.; Wagner, C,; Bornmann, L.: Replicability and the public/private divide (2016) 0.00
    0.0011986376 = product of:
      0.0023972753 = sum of:
        0.0023972753 = product of:
          0.0071918257 = sum of:
            0.0071918257 = weight(_text_:s in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071918257 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049891718 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045888513 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.7, S.1777-1778