Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, K."
  1. Liu, M.; Kwok, L.; Chan, K.: Why change to the Chinese Classification Scheme? : a case study in an academic library (2012) 0.06
    0.055401616 = sum of:
      0.029671771 = product of:
        0.118687086 = sum of:
          0.118687086 = weight(_text_:authors in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.118687086 = score(doc=1933,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025729846 = product of:
        0.051459692 = sum of:
          0.051459692 = weight(_text_:k in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051459692 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides a background for the change of the classification system for Chinese language materials at an academic library. It describes how the decision was made; how choices on partial reclassification or total reclassification were made; and how matters such as project planning, implementation, and vision for the future are being handled. It is hoped that the authors' experience can offer tips for other libraries contemplating reclassification projects. By making use of the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) numbers from various sources in Mainland China, the authors envisage increased cataloging efficiency and cost saving in the long run.
  2. Chan, K.; Hirons, J.: From AACR revisions to CONSER'S SCCTP : an interview with Jean Hirons (2001) 0.01
    0.014702768 = product of:
      0.029405536 = sum of:
        0.029405536 = product of:
          0.058811072 = sum of:
            0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058811072 = score(doc=1094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Lam, W.; Chan, K.; Radev, D.; Saggion, H.; Teufel, S.: Context-based generic cross-lingual retrieval of documents and automated summaries (2005) 0.01
    0.011027076 = product of:
      0.022054153 = sum of:
        0.022054153 = product of:
          0.044108305 = sum of:
            0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044108305 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)