Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2200 75400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f sacherschlie%c3%9fung in bibliotheken %2f schlagwortregeln%2c schlagwortverzeichnis%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 75000 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f sacherschlie%c3%9fung in bibliotheken %2f schlagwortregeln%2c schlagwortverzeichnis%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 75400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f sacherschlie%c3%9fung in bibliotheken %2f schlagwortregeln%2c schlagwortverzeichnis%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 75400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f sacherschlie%c3%9fung in bibliotheken %2f schlagwortregeln%2c sschlagwortverzeichnis%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2223 75400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f sacherschlie%c3%9fung in bibliotheken %2f schlagwortregeln%2c schlagwortverzeichnis%22 2

Ducheyne, S.: Paul Otlet's theory of knowledge and linguistic objectivism : embodied and dimensional classification (2005) 0.00
```
4.803786E-4 = product of:
  0.008166436 = sum of:
    0.008166436 = weight(_text_:in in 6083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008166436 = score(doc=6083,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6083, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6083)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
```
Abstract

In this paper, I point to the importance of an often neglected objectivist strand in Paul Otlet's (18681944) thinking: his linguistic objectivism. Linguistic objectivism consists in the view that linguistic atoms uniquely correspond to certain discrete and well-defined elements in the world and further combinations of these linguistic atoms can objectively capture "the order of the world". This analysis tempers some of the past claims on the influence of positivism on Otlet.
Ducheyne, S.: "To treat of the world" : Paul Otlet's ontology and epistemology and the circle of knowledge (2009) 0.00
```
3.6028394E-4 = product of:
  0.006124827 = sum of:
    0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006124827 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024967048 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to document how Paul Otlet, founding-father of what is termed at present as "information science", attempted to provide a complete "image of the world" (and reality in general) by establishing the scientific discipline he dubbed "documentation". The paper also aims to focus on how Otlet represented human knowledge and reality in a systematic and unified way. Design/methodology/approach - A close reading of Otlet's primary works and some of his personal archives was undertaken. Findings - Most importantly, it is shown that Otlet's views on documentation were immersed in a cosmological, objectivist, humanitarian and ontological framework that is alien to contemporary information science. Correspondingly, his alleged affinity with positivism is reassessed. Originality/value - The philosophical foundations of the origins of information science are highlighted. Indirectly, this paper is relevant to the ongoing debate on realism and anti-realism in information science.