Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Engerer, V."
  1. Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014) 0.02 
    0.021956014 = product of:
  0.109780066 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3644,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.077962935 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077962935 = score(doc=3644,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.0051268064 = product of:
      0.010253613 = sum of:
        0.010253613 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010253613 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Engerer, V.: Informationswissenschaft und Linguistik. : kurze Geschichte eines fruchtbaren interdisziplinäaren Verhäaltnisses in drei Akten (2012) 0.01 
    0.012294643 = product of:
  0.092209816 = sum of:
    0.027240701 = weight(_text_:und in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027240701 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.064969115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064969115 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Source
    SDV - Sprache und Datenverarbeitung. International journal for language data processing. 36(2012) H.2, S.71-91 [= E-Books - Fakten, Perspektiven und Szenarien] 36/2 (2012), S. 71-91
  3. Engerer, V.: Metapher und Wissenstransfers im informationsbezogenen Diskurs (2013) 0.01 
    0.006446613 = product of:
  0.048349597 = sum of:
    0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018872911 = score(doc=659,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
    0.029476684 = sum of:
      0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005919926 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023556758 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag1 ist ein Versuch, Eigenschaften von Schöns generativer Metapher auf das "statische" Resultat als Fachterminologie, entstanden durch Übertragung eines wissenschaftlichen Bereiches in einen anderen, anzuwenden. Metapher gilt in diesem Bereich als wissenstransferierendes Verfahren der Übertragung von Konzepten einer Disziplin auf eine andere. Weiterhin wird Metapher als Teil des sprachlichen Jargons in der informationswissenschaftlichen und bibliothekarischen Praxis thematisiert. Ein kurzer Durchgang des dänischen bibliotheksmetaphorischen Wortschatzes zeigt u. a., dass in dieser Domäne ein "ontologisches Erfahrungsgefälle" von abstrakt-konkret wirksam ist, da viele bibliothekstechnische, computer-interaktionsbezogene und informationswissenschaftliche Begriffe mit Hilfe konkreterer Konzepte aus besser verstandenen Domänen, z. B. dem Bereich der Nahrungsaufnahme, erklärt werden. Allerdings scheint auch hier der Anteil "entmetaphorisierter", ehemals metaphorischer Ausdrücke hoch zu sein, wie es bei "abgeschliffenen" Ausdrücken auch in der Gemeinsprache der Fall ist. Die Analyse wird abgerundet mit einem Ausblick auf ein Forschungsgebiet, das in dezidierter Weise von der konzeptuellen Ergiebigkeit des Metaphernbegriffs in der Untersuchung der terminologischen Wissenschaftsbeziehungen Gebrauch macht
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:06:49
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.23-33
  4. Engerer, V.: Control and syntagmatization : vocabulary requirements in information retrieval thesauri and natural language lexicons (2017) 0.00 
    0.0020475176 = product of:
  0.015356381 = sum of:
    0.009436456 = weight(_text_:und in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009436456 = score(doc=3678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
    0.005919926 = product of:
      0.011839852 = sum of:
        0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011839852 = score(doc=3678,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    This paper explores the relationships between natural language lexicons in lexical semantics and thesauri in information retrieval research. These different areas of knowledge have different restrictions on use of vocabulary; thesauri are used only in information search and retrieval contexts, whereas lexicons are mental systems and generally applicable in all domains of life. A set of vocabulary requirements that defines the more concrete characteristics of vocabulary items in the 2 contexts can be derived from this framework: lexicon items have to be learnable, complex, transparent, etc., whereas thesaurus terms must be effective, current and relevant, searchable, etc. The differences in vocabulary properties correlate with 2 other factors, the well-known dimension of Control (deliberate, social activities of building and maintaining vocabularies), and Syntagmatization, which is less known and describes vocabulary items' varying formal preparedness to exit the thesaurus/lexicon, enter into linear syntactic constructions, and, finally, acquire communicative functionality. It is proposed that there is an inverse relationship between Control and Syntagmatization.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.6, S.1480-1490
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Engerer, V.: Indexierungstheorie für Linguisten : zu einigen natürlichsprachlichen Zügen in künstlichen Indexsprachen (2014) 0.00 
    0.0012581941 = product of:
  0.018872911 = sum of:
    0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018872911 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Dialekte, Konzepte, Kontakte. Ergebnisse des Arbeitstreffens der Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen, GeSuS e.V., 31. Mai - 1. Juni 2013 in Freiburg/Breisgau. Hrsg.: V. Schönenberger et al
  6. Engerer, V.: Exploring interdisciplinary relationships between linguistics and information retrieval from the 1960s to today (2017) 0.00 
    6.2401505E-4 = product of:
  0.009360225 = sum of:
    0.009360225 = product of:
      0.01872045 = sum of:
        0.01872045 = weight(_text_:information in 3434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01872045 = score(doc=3434,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 3434, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    This article explores how linguistics has influenced information retrieval (IR) and attempts to explain the impact of linguistics through an analysis of internal developments in information science generally, and IR in particular. It notes that information science/IR has been evolving from a case science into a fully fledged, "disciplined"/disciplinary science. The article establishes correspondences between linguistics and information science/IR using the three established IR paradigms-physical, cognitive, and computational-as a frame of reference. The current relationship between information science/IR and linguistics is elucidated through discussion of some recent information science publications dealing with linguistic topics and a novel technique, "keyword collocation analysis," is introduced. Insights from interdisciplinarity research and case theory are also discussed. It is demonstrated that the three stages of interdisciplinarity, namely multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity (in the narrow sense), and transdisciplinarity, can be linked to different phases of the information science/IR-linguistics relationship and connected to different ways of using linguistic theory in information science and IR.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.660-680

Languages

Themes