Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fang, Z."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024) 0.08 
    0.07764676 = sum of:
  0.020753428 = product of:
    0.08301371 = sum of:
      0.08301371 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08301371 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.056893338 = product of:
    0.113786675 = sum of:
      0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113786675 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051127672 = queryNorm
          0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.
  2. Zhang, L.; Gou, Z.; Fang, Z.; Sivertsen, G.; Huang, Y.: Who tweets scientific publications? : a large-scale study of tweeting audiences in all areas of research (2023) 0.03 
    0.028446669 = product of:
  0.056893338 = sum of:
    0.056893338 = product of:
      0.113786675 = sum of:
        0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113786675 = score(doc=1189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Fang, Z.; Dudek, J.; Costas, R.: Facing the volatility of tweets in altmetric research (2022) 0.02 
    0.0241378 = product of:
  0.0482756 = sum of:
    0.0482756 = product of:
      0.0965512 = sum of:
        0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0965512 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Fang, Z.; Costas, R.; Tian, W.; Wang, X.; Wouters, P.: How is science clicked on Twitter? : click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications (2021) 0.02 
    0.020114832 = product of:
  0.040229663 = sum of:
    0.040229663 = product of:
      0.08045933 = sum of:
        0.08045933 = weight(_text_:z in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08045933 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051127672 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors