-
Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024)
0.02
0.024533473 = sum of:
0.021509495 = product of:
0.08603798 = sum of:
0.08603798 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08603798 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0030239774 = product of:
0.006047955 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.
- Language
- e
-
Fang, Z.; Dudek, J.; Costas, R.: Facing the volatility of tweets in altmetric research (2022)
0.00
0.0018143863 = product of:
0.0036287727 = sum of:
0.0036287727 = product of:
0.0072575454 = sum of:
0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072575454 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Fang, Z.; Costas, R.; Tian, W.; Wang, X.; Wouters, P.: How is science clicked on Twitter? : click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications (2021)
0.00
0.0015119887 = product of:
0.0030239774 = sum of:
0.0030239774 = product of:
0.006047955 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Zhang, L.; Gou, Z.; Fang, Z.; Sivertsen, G.; Huang, Y.: Who tweets scientific publications? : a large-scale study of tweeting audiences in all areas of research (2023)
0.00
0.0015119887 = product of:
0.0030239774 = sum of:
0.0030239774 = product of:
0.006047955 = sum of:
0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006047955 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.052990302 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e