Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fox, M.J."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Fox, M.J.: Medical discourse's epistemic influence on gender classification in three editions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.08 
    0.08112043 = product of:
  0.12168065 = sum of:
    0.10195644 = product of:
      0.3058693 = sum of:
        0.3058693 = weight(_text_:ddc's in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3058693 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47318554 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048526984 = queryNorm
            0.6464046 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.019724209 = product of:
      0.039448418 = sum of:
        0.039448418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039448418 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16993323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048526984 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The first (1876), second (1885), and seventeenth (1965) editions of the Dewey Decimal Classification each represent a major change in the way sex and gender are classified. The intention in this paper is to determine how closely the changes in the DDC correspond to shifts in medical thought regarding sex and gender classification. The metanarrative underpinning gender classification in American intersexuality medical discourse is illuminated using Foucault's genealogical discourse analysis to determine a selection of epistemic considerations including teleology, authority/subjectivity, rhetorical space, necessary and sufficient conditions. The same criteria are used to examine the DDC's internal discourse to detect if similar epistemic shifts are at play or not and if a detectable influence can be identified.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: Which ethics? Whose morality? : an analysis of ethical standards for information organization (2012) 0.03 
    0.03398548 = product of:
  0.10195644 = sum of:
    0.10195644 = product of:
      0.3058693 = sum of:
        0.3058693 = weight(_text_:ddc's in 424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3058693 = score(doc=424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47318554 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048526984 = queryNorm
            0.6464046 = fieldWeight in 424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=424)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Ethical standards are required at both the individual and system levels of the information organization enterprise, but are those standards the same? For example, are the ethical responsibilities of DDC's editorial board fundamentally the same as for an individual cataloger? And, what are the consequences of decisions made using different ethical frameworks to the users of knowledge organization systems? A selection of ethical theories suitable for evaluating moral dilemmas at all levels in information organization is presented, including utilitarianism, deontology, and pragmatism, as well as the more contemporary approaches of justice, feminist, and Derridean ethics. Finally, a selection of criteria is outlined, taken from the existing ethical frameworks, to use as a starting point for development of an ethical framework specifically for information organization.
  3. Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Pinho, F.A.; Fox, M.J.: ¬The representation of ethics and knowledge organization in the WoS and LISTA databases (2015) 0.01 
    0.0065747364 = product of:
  0.019724209 = sum of:
    0.019724209 = product of:
      0.039448418 = sum of:
        0.039448418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039448418 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16993323 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048526984 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 2.2018 16:50:22

Authors

Themes