Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  1. Santis, R. de; Gnoli, C.: Expressing dependence relationships in the Integrative Levels Classification using OWL (2016) 0.01
    0.012673602 = product of:
      0.025347205 = sum of:
        0.025347205 = product of:
          0.05069441 = sum of:
            0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05069441 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.: Classifying by phenomena, theories and methods : examples with focused social science theories (2008) 0.01
    0.011089402 = product of:
      0.022178805 = sum of:
        0.022178805 = product of:
          0.04435761 = sum of:
            0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 2250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04435761 = score(doc=2250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Gnoli, C.: Boundaries and overlaps of disciplines in Bloch's methodology of historical knowledge (2014) 0.01
    0.010637206 = product of:
      0.021274412 = sum of:
        0.021274412 = product of:
          0.042548824 = sum of:
            0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042548824 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.01
    0.010637206 = product of:
      0.021274412 = sum of:
        0.021274412 = product of:
          0.042548824 = sum of:
            0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042548824 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  5. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010637206 = product of:
      0.021274412 = sum of:
        0.021274412 = product of:
          0.042548824 = sum of:
            0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042548824 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  6. Gnoli, C.; Poli, R.: Levels of reality and levels of representation (2004) 0.01
    0.009505202 = product of:
      0.019010404 = sum of:
        0.019010404 = product of:
          0.03802081 = sum of:
            0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03802081 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Simoes, G.; Machado, L.; Gnoli, C.; Souza, R.: Can an ontologically-oriented KO do without concepts? (2020) 0.01
    0.009505202 = product of:
      0.019010404 = sum of:
        0.019010404 = product of:
          0.03802081 = sum of:
            0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 4964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03802081 = score(doc=4964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
  9. Gnoli, C.: Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization (2008) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research can benefit by periodical consideration of its status in a long-term perspective. In knowledge organization (KO), a number of basic questions remain to be addressed in the 21st century. Ten of them are identified and synthetically discussed: (1) Can KO principles be extended to a broader scope, including hypertexts, multimedia, museum objects, and monuments? (2) Can the two basic approaches, ontological and epistemological, be reconciled? (3) Can any ontological foundation of KO be identified? (4) Should disciplines continue to be the structural base of KO? (5) How can viewpoint warrant be respected? (6) How can KO be adapted to local collection needs? (7) How can KO deal with changes in knowledge? (8) How can KO systems represent all the dimensions listed above? (9) How can software and formats be improved to better serve these needs? (10) Who should do KO: information professionals, authors or readers?
  10. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 2: Types and levels (2017) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After making the case that phenomena can be the primary unit of classification (Part 1), some basic principles to group and sort phenomena are considered. Entities can be grouped together on the basis of both their similarity (morphology) and their common origin (phylogeny). The resulting groups will form the classical hierarchical chains of types and subtypes. At every hierarchical degree, phenomena can form ordered sets (arrays), where their sorting can reflect levels of increasing organization, corresponding to an evolutionary order of appearance (emergence). The theory of levels of reality has been investigated by many philosophers and applied to knowledge organization systems by various authors, which are briefly reviewed. At the broadest degree, it allows to identify some major strata of phenomena (forms, matter, life, minds, societies and culture) in turn divided into layers. A list of twenty-six layers is proposed to form the main classes of the Integrative Levels Classification system. A combination of morphology and phylogeny can determine whether a given phenomenon should be a type of an existing level, or a level on its own.
  11. Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.0088643385 = product of:
      0.017728677 = sum of:
        0.017728677 = product of:
          0.035457354 = sum of:
            0.035457354 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035457354 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:08
  12. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.01
    0.0088643385 = product of:
      0.017728677 = sum of:
        0.017728677 = product of:
          0.035457354 = sum of:
            0.035457354 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035457354 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  13. Gnoli, C.; Szostak, R.: ¬The Leon Manifesto (2007) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.; López-Huertas, M.: Interdisciplinary knowledge organization 0.01
    0.006336801 = product of:
      0.012673602 = sum of:
        0.012673602 = product of:
          0.025347205 = sum of:
            0.025347205 = weight(_text_:r in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025347205 = score(doc=3804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Gnoli, C.: Mentefacts as a missing level in theory of information science (2018) 0.01
    0.006336801 = product of:
      0.012673602 = sum of:
        0.012673602 = product of:
          0.025347205 = sum of:
            0.025347205 = weight(_text_:r in 4624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025347205 = score(doc=4624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 4624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The current debate between two theoretical approaches in library and information science and knowledge organization (KO), the cognitive one and the sociological one, is addressed in view of their possible integration in a more general model. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Personal knowledge of individual users, as focused in the cognitive approach, and social production and use of knowledge, as focused in the sociological approach, are reconnected to the theory of levels of reality, particularly in the versions of Nicolai Hartmann and Karl R. Popper (three worlds). The notions of artefact and mentefact, as proposed in anthropological literature and applied in some KO systems, are also examined as further contributions to the generalized framework. Some criticisms to these models are reviewed and discussed. Findings Both the cognitive approach and the sociological approach, if taken in isolation, prove to be cases of philosophical monism as they emphasize a single level over the others. On the other hand, each of them can be considered as a component of a pluralist ontology and epistemology, where individual minds and social communities are but two successive levels in knowledge production and use, and are followed by a further level of "objectivated spirit"; this can in turn be analyzed into artefacts and mentefacts. While all these levels are relevant to information science, mentefacts and their properties are its most peculiar objects of study, which make it distinct from such other disciplines as psychology and sociology. Originality/value This analysis shows how existing approaches can benefit from additional notions contributed by levels theory, to develop more complete and accurate models of information and knowledge phenomena.