Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Grötschel, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Grötschel, M.: Best current practices : Recommendations on electronic information communication (2002). Endorsed by the IMU Executive Committee on April 13, 2002 in its 69th session in Paris, France (2002) 0.01
    0.007583938 = product of:
      0.030335752 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 1413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=1413,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1413, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1413)
        0.012484977 = product of:
          0.024969954 = sum of:
            0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 1413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024969954 = score(doc=1413,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 1413, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Communication of mathematical research and scholarship is undergoing profound change as new technology creates new ways to disseminate and access the literature. More than technology is changing, however; the culture and practices of those who create, disseminate, and archive the mathematical literature are changing as well. For the sake of present and future mathematicians, we should shape those changes to make them suit the needs of the discipline.
  2. Grötschel, M.: Copyright und elektronisches Publizieren : Auf dem Weg zu vernüftigen Regelungen? (2001) 0.00
    0.0011035264 = product of:
      0.008828212 = sum of:
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 16) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=16,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 16, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=16)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das Committee on Electronic Information and Communication (CEIC) der International Mathematical Union (IMU) hat die Aufgabe, sich über die langfristige Informationsversorgung in der Mathematik Gedanken zu machen und Lösungsvorschläge hierfür zu erarbeiten. Das Kernthema ist natürlich "Elektronisches Publizieren". Dazu gehören auch Copyright-Regelungen. Mit diesem Artikel beginnt eine kleine Serie von Aufsätzen, in denen ich (in meiner Funktion als eines von elf CEIC-Mitgliedern) die Empfehlungen des CEIC erläutern werde