Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.02
```
0.01565061 = product of:
  0.03130122 = sum of:
    0.03130122 = product of:
      0.12520488 = sum of:
        0.12520488 = weight(_text_:author's in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12520488 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowledge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowledge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowledge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowledge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.
Lardera, M.; Hjoerland, B.: Keyword (2021) 0.02
```
0.01546224 = product of:
  0.03092448 = sum of:
    0.03092448 = product of:
      0.06184896 = sum of:
        0.06184896 = weight(_text_:n in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06184896 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.28582513 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This article discusses the different meanings of 'keyword' and related terms such as 'keyphrase', 'descriptor', 'index term', 'subject heading', 'tag' and 'n-gram' and suggests definitions of each of these terms. It further illustrates a classification of keywords, based on how they are produced or who is the actor generating them and present comparison between author-assigned keywords, indexer-assigned keywords and reader-assigned keywords as well as the automatic generation of keywords. The article also considers the functions of keywords including the use of keywords for generating bibliographic indexes. The theoretical view informing the article is that the assignment of a keyword to a text, picture or other document involves an interpretation of the document and an evaluation of the document's potentials for users. This perspective is important for both manually assigned keywords and for automated generation and is opposed to a strong tendency to consider a set of keywords as ideally presenting one best representation of a document for all requests.

Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01

0.008499491 = product of:
  0.016998982 = sum of:
    0.016998982 = product of:
      0.033997964 = sum of:
        0.033997964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033997964 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 18.11.2023 13:47:22