Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.06
    0.058525518 = sum of:
      0.037927795 = product of:
        0.15171118 = sum of:
          0.15171118 = weight(_text_:author's in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15171118 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.340551 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050676074 = queryNorm
              0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020597724 = product of:
        0.04119545 = sum of:
          0.04119545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04119545 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050676074 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent study in information science (IS), raises important issues concerning the value of human indexing and basic theories of indexing and information retrieval, as well as the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches in IS and the underlying theories of knowledge informing the field. The present article uses L&E as the point of departure for demonstrating in what way more social and interpretative understandings may provide fruitful improvements for research in indexing, knowledge organization, and information retrieval. The artcle is motivated by the observation that philosophical contributions tend to be ignored in IS if they are not directly formed as criticisms or invitations to dialogs. It is part of the author's ongoing publication of articles about philosophical issues in IS and it is intended to be followed by analyzes of other examples of contributions to core issues in IS. Although it is formulated as a criticism of a specific paper, it should be seen as part of a general discussion of the philosophical foundation of IS and as a support to the emerging social paradigm in this field.
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  2. Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Understandings of language and cognition : implications for classification research (1994) 0.02
    0.02147335 = product of:
      0.0429467 = sum of:
        0.0429467 = product of:
          0.0858934 = sum of:
            0.0858934 = weight(_text_:r in 8884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0858934 = score(doc=8884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.02
    0.015803248 = product of:
      0.031606495 = sum of:
        0.031606495 = product of:
          0.12642598 = sum of:
            0.12642598 = weight(_text_:author's in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12642598 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.340551 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowl­edge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowl­edge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowl­edge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowl­edge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowl­edge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010) 0.01
    0.012270486 = product of:
      0.024540972 = sum of:
        0.024540972 = product of:
          0.049081944 = sum of:
            0.049081944 = weight(_text_:r in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049081944 = score(doc=3323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung zu: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1076-1077.
  5. Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01
    0.012015339 = product of:
      0.024030678 = sum of:
        0.024030678 = product of:
          0.048061356 = sum of:
            0.048061356 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048061356 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:11:22
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.012015339 = product of:
      0.024030678 = sum of:
        0.024030678 = product of:
          0.048061356 = sum of:
            0.048061356 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048061356 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  7. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The phrase "information storage and retrieval" (IS&R) : an historical note (2015) 0.01
    0.010736675 = product of:
      0.02147335 = sum of:
        0.02147335 = product of:
          0.0429467 = sum of:
            0.0429467 = weight(_text_:r in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0429467 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01
    0.008582385 = product of:
      0.01716477 = sum of:
        0.01716477 = product of:
          0.03432954 = sum of:
            0.03432954 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03432954 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01
    0.008582385 = product of:
      0.01716477 = sum of:
        0.01716477 = product of:
          0.03432954 = sum of:
            0.03432954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03432954 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01
    0.008582385 = product of:
      0.01716477 = sum of:
        0.01716477 = product of:
          0.03432954 = sum of:
            0.03432954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03432954 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  11. Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.01
    0.0076690535 = product of:
      0.015338107 = sum of:
        0.015338107 = product of:
          0.030676214 = sum of:
            0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030676214 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To suggest that a theory of classification for information retrieval (IR), asked for by Spärck Jones in a 1970 paper, presupposes a full implementation of a pragmatic understanding. Part of the Journal of Documentation celebration, "60 years of the best in information research". Design/methodology/approach - Literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Sparck Jones as its starting-point. Analysis involves distinctions between "positivism" and "pragmatism" and "classical" versus Kuhnian understandings of concepts. Findings - Classification, both manual and automatic, for retrieval benefits from drawing upon a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, a consideration of theories of meaning, and the adding of top-down approaches to IR in which divisions of labour, domains, traditions, genres, document architectures etc. are included as analytical elements and in which specific IR algorithms are based on the examination of specific literatures. Introduces an example illustrating the consequences of a full implementation of a pragmatist understanding when handling homonyms. Practical implications - Outlines how to classify from a pragmatic-philosophical point of view. Originality/value - Provides, emphasizing a pragmatic understanding, insights of importance to classification for retrieval, both manual and automatic. - Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.319-332.
  12. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.01
    0.0076690535 = product of:
      0.015338107 = sum of:
        0.015338107 = product of:
          0.030676214 = sum of:
            0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030676214 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.01
    0.0076690535 = product of:
      0.015338107 = sum of:
        0.015338107 = product of:
          0.030676214 = sum of:
            0.030676214 = weight(_text_:r in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030676214 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.
  14. Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002) 0.00
    0.0046014325 = product of:
      0.009202865 = sum of:
        0.009202865 = product of:
          0.01840573 = sum of:
            0.01840573 = weight(_text_:r in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01840573 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1677509 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    0.0042911926 = product of:
      0.008582385 = sum of:
        0.008582385 = product of:
          0.01716477 = sum of:
            0.01716477 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01716477 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17745897 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050676074 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27