Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Albrechtsen, H.: ¬An analysis of some trends in classification research (1999) 0.02
    0.024751049 = product of:
      0.049502097 = sum of:
        0.049502097 = product of:
          0.14850628 = sum of:
            0.14850628 = weight(_text_:bliss in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14850628 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37579033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper takes a second look at three prevailing main themes in knowledge organization: i) the academic disciplines as the main structural principle; ii) the fiction/non-fiction distinction; and iii) the appropriate unit of analysis in online retrieval systems. The history and origin of bibliographic classification [Dewey, Bliss, Mills, Beghtol] are discussed from the perspective of pragmatist philosophy and social studies of science [Kuhn, Merton, Reich]. Choices of structural principles in different schemes are found to rely on more or less implicit philosophical foundations, ranging from rationalism to pragmatism. It is further shown how the increasing application of faceted structures as basic structural principles in universal classification schemes [DDC, UDC] impose rationalistic principles and structures for knowledge organization which are not in alignment with the development of knowledge in the covered disciplines. Further evidence of rationalism in knowledge organization is the fiction/non-fiction distinction, excluding the important role of artistic resources for, in particular, humanistic research. Finally, for the analysis of appropriate bibliographic unit, it is argued that there is a need to shift towards a semiotic approach, founded on an understanding of intertextuality, rather than applying standard principles of hierarchical decomposition of documents. It is concluded that a change in classification research is needed, founded on a more historical and social understanding of knowledge
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Facet analysis : the logical approach to knowledge organization (2013) 0.02
    0.024751049 = product of:
      0.049502097 = sum of:
        0.049502097 = product of:
          0.14850628 = sum of:
            0.14850628 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14850628 = score(doc=2720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37579033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.3951839 = fieldWeight in 2720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2720)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The facet-analytic paradigm is probably the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within Library and Information Science, and in many ways it has dominated what has be termed "modern classification theory". It was mainly developed by S.R. Ranganathan and the British Classification Research Group, but it is mostly based on principles of logical division developed more than two millennia ago. Colon Classification (CC) and Bliss 2 (BC2) are among the most important systems developed on this theoretical basis, but it has also influenced the development of other systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and is also applied in many websites. It still has a strong position in the field and it is the most explicit and "pure" theoretical approach to knowledge organization (KO) (but it is not by implication necessarily also the most important one). The strength of this approach is its logical principles and the way it provides structures in knowledge organization systems (KOS). The main weaknesses are (1) its lack of empirical basis and (2) its speculative ordering of knowledge without basis in the development or influence of theories and socio-historical studies. It seems to be based on the problematic assumption that relations between concepts are a priori and not established by the development of models, theories and laws.
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01
    0.012455309 = product of:
      0.024910618 = sum of:
        0.024910618 = product of:
          0.049821235 = sum of:
            0.049821235 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049821235 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:11:22
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.012455309 = product of:
      0.024910618 = sum of:
        0.024910618 = product of:
          0.049821235 = sum of:
            0.049821235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049821235 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  5. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01
    0.010675979 = product of:
      0.021351958 = sum of:
        0.021351958 = product of:
          0.042703915 = sum of:
            0.042703915 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042703915 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:22:55
  6. Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01
    0.008896649 = product of:
      0.017793298 = sum of:
        0.017793298 = product of:
          0.035586596 = sum of:
            0.035586596 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035586596 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:49:13
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01
    0.008896649 = product of:
      0.017793298 = sum of:
        0.017793298 = product of:
          0.035586596 = sum of:
            0.035586596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035586596 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01
    0.008896649 = product of:
      0.017793298 = sum of:
        0.017793298 = product of:
          0.035586596 = sum of:
            0.035586596 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035586596 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  9. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00
    0.0044483244 = product of:
      0.008896649 = sum of:
        0.008896649 = product of:
          0.017793298 = sum of:
            0.017793298 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017793298 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18395704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052531693 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27