Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains (2003) 0.04
```
0.03785965 = product of:
  0.0757193 = sum of:
    0.0757193 = product of:
      0.22715788 = sum of:
        0.22715788 = weight(_text_:objects in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22715788 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.7119882 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Domains are basically constituted of three kinds of theories and concepts: (1) ontological theories and concepts about the objects of human activity; (2) epistemological theories and concepts about knowledge and the ways to obtain knowledge, implying methodological principles about the ways objects are investigated; and (3) sociological concepts about the groups of people concerned with the objects. There are complicated relations between these elements. Basic theories about those relationships are, for example, forms of philosophical realism and social constructivism. In this paper these concepts and theories are introduced, and their implications for knowledge organization outlined, with illustrations drawn from this special issue of Knowledge Organization.

Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.02

0.023479467 = product of:
  0.046958935 = sum of:
    0.046958935 = product of:
      0.09391787 = sum of:
        0.09391787 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09391787 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.29399413 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, ed. by B. Hjoerland. [http://www.isko.org/cyclo/logical_division]

Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.02
```
0.023479467 = product of:
  0.046958935 = sum of:
    0.046958935 = product of:
      0.09391787 = sum of:
        0.09391787 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09391787 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3194549 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.29399413 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowledge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowledge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowledge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowledge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2013) 0.02
```
0.015613055 = product of:
  0.03122611 = sum of:
    0.03122611 = product of:
      0.093678325 = sum of:
        0.093678325 = weight(_text_:objects in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093678325 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Any ontological theory commits us to accept and classify a number of phenomena in a more or less specific way-and vice versa: a classification tends to reveal the theoretical outlook of its creator. Objects and their descriptions and relations are not just "given," but determined by theories. Knowledge is fallible, and consensus is rare. By implication, knowledge organization has to consider different theories/views and their foundations. Bibliographical classifications depend on subject knowledge and on the same theories as corresponding scientific and scholarly classifications. Some classifications are based on logical distinctions, others on empirical examinations, and some on mappings of common ancestors or on establishing functional criteria. To evaluate a classification is to involve oneself in the research which has produced the given classification. Because research is always based more or less on specific epistemological ideals (e.g., empiricism, rationalism, historicism, or pragmatism), the evaluation of classification includes the evaluation of the epistemological foundations of the research on which given classifications have been based. The field of knowledge organization itself is based on different approaches and traditions such as user-based and cognitive views, facet-analytical views, numeric taxonomic approaches, bibliometrics, and domain-analytic approaches. These approaches and traditions are again connected to epistemological views, which have to be considered. Only the domain-analytic view is fully committed to exploring knowledge organization in the light of subject knowledge and substantial scholarly theories.

Hjoerland, B.; Christensen, F.S.: Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance : a specific example (2002) 0.01

0.01423243 = product of:
  0.02846486 = sum of:
    0.02846486 = product of:
      0.05692972 = sum of:
        0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 5237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05692972 = score(doc=5237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5237)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 21. 7.2006 14:11:22

Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01

0.01423243 = product of:
  0.02846486 = sum of:
    0.02846486 = product of:
      0.05692972 = sum of:
        0.05692972 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05692972 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: S.22-36

Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : indexing and information retrieval as an example (2011) 0.01

0.012199225 = product of:
  0.02439845 = sum of:
    0.02439845 = product of:
      0.0487969 = sum of:
        0.0487969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0487969 = score(doc=4359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 17. 3.2011 19:22:55

Hjoerland, B.: User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization : a theoretical analysis of the research literature (2013) 0.01

0.010166021 = product of:
  0.020332042 = sum of:
    0.020332042 = product of:
      0.040664084 = sum of:
        0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040664084 = score(doc=629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 2.2013 11:49:13

Hjoerland, B.: Classical databases and knowledge organisation : a case for Boolean retrieval and human decision-making during search (2014) 0.01

0.010166021 = product of:
  0.020332042 = sum of:
    0.020332042 = product of:
      0.040664084 = sum of:
        0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040664084 = score(doc=1398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1398)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01

0.010166021 = product of:
  0.020332042 = sum of:
    0.020332042 = product of:
      0.040664084 = sum of:
        0.040664084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040664084 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 18.11.2023 13:47:22

Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.01

0.0050830105 = product of:
  0.010166021 = sum of:
    0.010166021 = product of:
      0.020332042 = sum of:
        0.020332042 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020332042 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.060026903 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 18:13:27

Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes