Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ingenerf, J."
  1. Ingenerf, J.: Benutzeranpaßbare semantische Sprachanalyse und Begriffsrepräsentation für die medizinische Dokumentation (1993) 0.03 
    0.02810499 = product of:
  0.05620998 = sum of:
    0.05620998 = sum of:
      0.012529651 = weight(_text_:a in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012529651 = score(doc=1903,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
      0.043680333 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043680333 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This dissertation aims at representing concepts of medical subjects as well as statements on medical subjects independent of medical terminology, in order to overcome the problems of interpretation and further elaboration of entries in an ordering system such as SNOMED, MeSH-Thesaurus or ICD Classification. The approach of a compositional, semantic language analysis developed here implies specific demands from a conceptual modelling and utilizes the following methods: (1) a characteristics-based grammar formalism for represenatation of terminological structures, to be analyzed, (2) a terminological representation formalism for a conceptual-intensionally-oriented representation of a concept system, and (3) a modified chart-parser for grammatical derivation
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.2, S.102-103 (P. Hucklenbroich)
  2. Ingenerf, J.: Disambiguating lexical meaning : conceptual meta-modelling as a means of controlling semantic language analysis (1994) 0.00 
    0.0030444188 = product of:
  0.0060888375 = sum of:
    0.0060888375 = product of:
      0.012177675 = sum of:
        0.012177675 = weight(_text_:a in 2572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177675 = score(doc=2572,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2572, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A formal terminology consists of a set of conceptual definitions for the semantical reconstruction of a vocabulary on an intensional level of description. The marking of comparatively abstract concepts as semantic categories and their relational positioning on a meta-level is shown to be instrumental in adapting the conceptual design to domain-specific characteristics. Such a meta-model implies that concepts subsumed by categories may share their compositional possibilities as regards the construction of complex structures. Our approach to language processing leads to an automatic derivation of contextual semantic information about the linguistic expressions under review. This information is encoded by means of values of certain attributes defined in a feature-based grammatical framework. A standard process controlling grammatical analysis, the unification of feature structures, is used for its evaluation. One important example for the usefulness of this approach is the disamgiguation of lexical meaning
    Type
    a
  3. Ingenerf, J.: ¬Die Notwendigkeit und das Dilemma monohierarchischer, nichtkombinatorischer Klassifikationen (1993) 0.00 
    0.0023678814 = product of:
  0.0047357627 = sum of:
    0.0047357627 = product of:
      0.009471525 = sum of:
        0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 7752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009471525 = score(doc=7752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  4. Ingenerf, J.: Intensional orientierte Begriffsordnungssysteme und die Dichotomie analytisch-synthetischer Urteile (1995) 0.00 
    0.0020296127 = product of:
  0.0040592253 = sum of:
    0.0040592253 = product of:
      0.008118451 = sum of:
        0.008118451 = weight(_text_:a in 1137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008118451 = score(doc=1137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1137)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a

Languages

Types