Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Johnson, F.C."
  1. Johnson, F.C.: ¬A natural language understanding system for reference resolution in information dialogues (1996) 0.02
    0.023691658 = product of:
      0.047383316 = sum of:
        0.047383316 = sum of:
          0.00994303 = weight(_text_:a in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00994303 = score(doc=6968,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
          0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 6968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037440285 = score(doc=6968,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6968, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Demonstrates how a natural language understanding (NLU) system can be developed to utilize low level pragmatic information, primarily the linguistic context, to deal effectively with the linguistic devices of anaphors and ellipsis and allow users to query databases for reference information without the need for menus or fixed phrases and query structures. Describes the components which comprise a NLU system to deal with continuous dialogue. Given that the syntactic and semantic information can produce a suitable information of each utterance, pragmatic information may be used to determine how this contectual information determines the interpretation of subsequent utterances. Suggests that the approach taken allows the system to provide a cooperative response to assist the user in attaining the information seeking goal
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Type
    a
  2. Johnson, F.C.: ¬A classification of ellipsis based on a corpus of information seeking dialogues (1994) 0.00
    0.0030255679 = product of:
      0.0060511357 = sum of:
        0.0060511357 = product of:
          0.012102271 = sum of:
            0.012102271 = weight(_text_:a in 7803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012102271 = score(doc=7803,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 7803, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Elliptical utterances are an integral part of information seeking dialogues and information searchers appear to persist in using ellipsis even when requested not to. However, an analysis of ellipsis usage can reveal much of value to researchers of information seeking behaviour and strategies in the use of databases. Attempts to classify different types of ellipsis so as to develop a theory of ellipsis as a pragmatic phenomenon
    Type
    a
  3. Johnson, F.C.: ¬A critical view of system-centered to user-centered evaluation of automatic abstracting research (1999) 0.00
    0.0028703054 = product of:
      0.005740611 = sum of:
        0.005740611 = product of:
          0.011481222 = sum of:
            0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011481222 = score(doc=2994,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993) 0.00
    0.0016913437 = product of:
      0.0033826875 = sum of:
        0.0033826875 = product of:
          0.006765375 = sum of:
            0.006765375 = weight(_text_:a in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006765375 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a