-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationspathologien - Desinformation (2023)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.829-841
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsaufbereitung III : Referieren (Abstracts - Abstracting - Grundlagen) (2004)
0.00
8.508044E-4 = product of:
0.0017016088 = sum of:
0.0017016088 = product of:
0.0034032175 = sum of:
0.0034032175 = weight(_text_:s in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034032175 = score(doc=2917,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Was ein Abstract (im Folgenden synonym mit Referat oder Kurzreferat gebraucht) ist, legt das American National Standards Institute in einer Weise fest, die sicherlich von den meisten Fachleuten akzeptiert werden kann: "An abstract is defined as an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document"; fast genauso die deutsche Norm DIN 1426: "Das Kurzreferat gibt kurz und klar den Inhalt des Dokuments wieder." Abstracts gehören zum wissenschaftlichen Alltag. Weitgehend allen Publikationen, zumindest in den naturwissenschaftlichen, technischen, informationsbezogenen oder medizinischen Bereichen, gehen Abstracts voran, "prefe-rably prepared by its author(s) for publication with it". Es gibt wohl keinen Wissenschaftler, der nicht irgendwann einmal ein Abstract geschrieben hätte. Gehört das Erstellen von Abstracts dann überhaupt zur dokumentarischen bzw informationswissenschaftlichen Methodenlehre, wenn es jeder kann? Was macht den informationellen Mehrwert aus, der durch Expertenreferate gegenüber Laienreferaten erzeugt wird? Dies ist nicht so leicht zu beantworten, zumal geeignete Bewertungsverfahren fehlen, die Qualität von Abstracts vergleichend "objektiv" zu messen. Abstracts werden in erheblichem Umfang von Informationsspezialisten erstellt, oft unter der Annahme, dass Autoren selber dafür weniger geeignet sind. Vergegenwärtigen wir uns, was wir über Abstracts und Abstracting wissen. Ein besonders gelungenes Abstract ist zuweilen klarer als der Ursprungstext selber, darf aber nicht mehr Information als dieser enthalten: "Good abstracts are highly structured, concise, and coherent, and are the result of a thorough analysis of the content of the abstracted materials. Abstracts may be more readable than the basis documents, but because of size constraints they rarely equal and never surpass the information content of the basic document". Dies ist verständlich, denn ein "Abstract" ist zunächst nichts anderes als ein Ergebnis des Vorgangs einer Abstraktion. Ohne uns zu sehr in die philosophischen Hintergründe der Abstraktion zu verlieren, besteht diese doch "in der Vernachlässigung von bestimmten Vorstellungsbzw. Begriffsinhalten, von welchen zugunsten anderer Teilinhalte abgesehen, abstrahiert' wird. Sie ist stets verbunden mit einer Fixierung von (interessierenden) Merkmalen durch die aktive Aufmerksamkeit, die unter einem bestimmten pragmatischen Gesichtspunkt als wesentlich' für einen vorgestellten bzw für einen unter einen Begriff fallenden Gegenstand (oder eine Mehrheit von Gegenständen) betrachtet werden". Abstracts reduzieren weniger Begriffsinhalte, sondern Texte bezüglich ihres proportionalen Gehaltes. Borko/ Bernier haben dies sogar quantifiziert; sie schätzen den Reduktionsfaktor auf 1:10 bis 1:12
- Pages
- S.189-206
-
Kuhlen, R.: Interessenverflechtungen - auf dem Weg zum UN-Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft (2003)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.3, S.137-148
-
Kuhlen, R.: Universal Access : Wem gehört Wissen? (2002)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.164-197
-
Kuhlen, R.: Kommunikationsrechte - "impart" oder "r2c"? (2003)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=1964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1964)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.7, S.389-400
-
Kuhlen, R.: Optionen und Obligationen nationaler und globaler Informationspolitik nach und vor dem Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft (WSIS) (2004)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 55(2004) H.4, S.199-209
-
Kuhlen, R.: Information (2004)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.3-20
-
Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1989)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Informatik: Forschung und Entwicklung. 4(1989), S.89-107
-
Kuhlen, R.: Creative Commons : Im Interesse der Kreativen und der Innovation (2005)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.157-162
-
Kuhlen, R.: Macht Google autonom? : Zur Ambivalenz informationeller Autonomie (2005)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.379-382
-
Kuhlen, R.: Wissensökologie (2004)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.105-113
-
Kuhlen, R.: Wissensökologie : Wissen und Information als Commons (Gemeingüter) (2013)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.68-85
-
Kuhlen, R.: Ins Steinzeitalter der Informationsversorgung : Scharfe Kritik an der gemeinsamen Stellungnahme von DBV und Börsenverein in Sachen Urheberrecht (2007)
0.00
5.317527E-4 = product of:
0.0010635054 = sum of:
0.0010635054 = product of:
0.0021270108 = sum of:
0.0021270108 = weight(_text_:s in 202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021270108 = score(doc=202,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.042470217 = fieldWeight in 202, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Deutscher Bibliotheksverband, Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels: Gemeinsame Stellungnahme zu den §§52b und 53a UrhG-RegE. In: Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.3, S.257-261.
- Source
- BuB. 59(2007) H.3, S.155-156
-
Kuhlen, R.: Wie viel Virtualität soll es denn sein? : Zu einigen Konsequenzen der fortschreitenden Telemediatisierung und Kommodifizierung der Wissensmärkte für die Bereitstellung von Wissen und Information durch Bibliotheken (2002)
0.00
5.264083E-4 = product of:
0.0010528166 = sum of:
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = weight(_text_:s in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021056333 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- BuB. 54(2002) H.10/11, S.621-632
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik (2004)
0.00
5.264083E-4 = product of:
0.0010528166 = sum of:
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = weight(_text_:s in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021056333 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.61-71
